Jump to content

Recommended Posts

So I asked John last night and had a note through the door this morning:


In Mary Boast's booklet "St John's, East Dulwich, Church & Parish" it says that an eminent lawyer, Charles Jasper Selwyn, agreed to give a site for the new church on his land, "the South East corner of the Great Field". This was how St John's came to be built on Goose Green. In 1863 upwards of 1,000 loads of earth from Denmark Hill were taken to fill in the pond on the site. Drain pipes were also laid down but problems with damp occurred at various later dates.


David: That's the best I can do from what I've got. I've left a message for Mary Boast to ring me.


Will keep you up-to-date.

Many thanks for the information about the St John's pond, David Mc.


I thought that St John's wasn't on Goose Green but adjacent.


There had to be a reason for building the church on an unsuitable site. Could it be the land was unsuitable for housing development? I wonder if Mr Selwyn also owned what is now Marsden Road!


Did Mr Beasley have anything to say about the alleged Goose Green ponds?

  • 2 weeks later...

He doesn't have a computer at home.


Anyway today he told me Mary didn't know all that much more than I've already told you. Just that the church was built in the most prominent space in the area at the time which happened to be either a pond or waterlogged so they brought "stuff" from Denmark Hill to fill it in.


Apparently there's a map ("Dewhirst's 1842 Map) showing the ponds which you can go and see in the Southwark Local History Library. Wherever that is!

What a fascinating map!


Interestingly, the whole oglander environs - obviously not yet biult on - shows no/little sign of use - pasture / meadow maybe ?


Not does it showe any watercourses - then agaion, the map doesnt seem to show many anyway


I think the fact that theres nothing on the land to the Souteast of DKH and North of GG itself may suggest something


or does it ?

It is a fantastic map. I noticed that ruskin park had what appeared to be a bunch of smallholdings on it along side Denmark hill. All gone now. And I loved the little traffic island atop dog kennel hill, so much nicer than the traffic lights.

More roundabouts, less traffic lights I say!!

I see Crystal Palace Road seems to have been called Harris's Road. A bit of early "carpet" bagging from the local peer?


And is the modern day The Gardens a throwback to the Market Gardens as marked on the same site? Surely it is.


Lovely map, and I'm sure you've all done this already but if you cut off the after the slash stuff and put www.mappalondon.com in yer browsers you can see a lot more of London.

Peckham and Dulwich and the area which is now ED were all famed for there market gardens and which supplied London with it's various English fruits. I would pay a fortune to go back and see it as it was, I imagine it to be beautiful. I notice the old Kings Arms on the corner of EDR and Peckham Rye junction. That is one local landmark that has been sorely missed every since it was flattened during the Blitz. The rebuild pub was never upto the stanard of the old Inn, and is now a block of private flats I believe? Great map!
  • 1 month later...

I've exhausted the carto-bibliogrphic references I have at home and those I can find on the internet.


The "Diwhurst" maps (and their pre-copyright "analogues") certainly have a very interesting and complicated history.


However none of those catalogued are at a large enough scale to have a resolution down to a pond on or near Goose Green.


All the carto-bibliographies have caveats about incomplete coverage.


If there is a large scale "Diwhurst" map at the Local Studies Library it needs to be inspected with Mark I eye-ball.


Does anyone work in The Borough who could pop in one lunch-time?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thank you, I will be vigilant
    • @Sue said: nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? This is the point. Adults are meant to teach their children by example. It sounds as though the adult guardian/ father in this case did not react appropriately. Had a truly sincere apology been given,  I suspect the OP would not have posted on here. It is possible the OP snapped in the heat of the moment, but they were possibly startled because they were hit from behind? If we are startled it can be instinctive to initially react with anger. I also agree that it would be highly irresponsible to let any very young child ride or walk or do anything on a busy public street without supervision- most of all to protect the child. If in this case the child was out of the adult's line of sight that is perhaps another indication that the father needs a refresh in appropriate behaviour around a child, as well as his manners.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...