Jump to content

Recommended Posts

My jacket was damaged at the gym as I was squeezing past someone not knowing that the wall was freshly painted (there were no signs!) Gym owner insists on a receipt - I bought that jacket approx. 1.5 years ago.


Is it reasonable to expect me to have a receipt after such a long time? She says she is not going to pay unless she has a receipt. I now found the jacket on the internet and I send her the link - original price ?150 / reduced to ?90 / I am asking for ?60. She says I have to proof purchase...


Does anybody have any idea on how to proceed?

I know that I paid - I didn't steal the jacket! (!) Can I seriously be expected to keep receipts that old? it's definitely more than a year ago. The statement doesn't state the item that I bought, only the shop name (if lucky) and the amount.
I think if you have the jacket (pretty conclusive proof of ownership) and an external verification of the price of it, it is not reasonable to insist on a receipt. If you sued her, you would not need a receipt to prove ownership as you have the jacket. Requests for receipts are more usual from insurers when the item has been stolen. But even they these days will not press the point if you have other evidence. Hope this helps.

the gym has been negligent and you have suffered a loss as a result. your loss is calculated as what? the cost of a replacement jacket of equal quality... dont settle for ?60 - go for ?150. If they dispute say that as you cant decide its best that the courts decide - thats if you are prepared to go to court - or at least threaten to, if not you wont get anything.

proof of purchase is irrelevant. you could have been given it as a gift but the loss is still the same - you now need to spend money putting yourself in the position you would have been had your jacket not been damaged - ie., a replacement jacket = ?150.

I think you've been very nice and I think her attitude sucks. Speaking personally, I'm quite litigious and it pays off 100%. I expect people to behave decently and, if they don't, I take no prisoners. Give her one last chance and then take her to the small claims court. This couldn't be more straightforward - you don't even need to leave the comfort of your laptop. You just fill out the form online, pay the fee (which she will need to repay when she looses), and hit send.


Effectively she has already admitted responsibility - she's just being awkward about receipts. You should claim for the full ?150. Also, remind her that when you go to court you will be claiming for your travel expenses and you will require compensating for using a day's holiday (if you are using a day's holiday).


Trust me - this is effective.


Over the last 15 years I have threatened the Small Claims Court 5 times.


3 times the defendant admitted the claim and paid up as soon as they received the SCC papers

2 times the defendant attempted to fight the claim - both lost, it cost them much more ??? than it would have had if they paid up in the first place, and finally, let me tell you - they both rued the day


I would also look to change your gym as quickly as possible and remind her that, not only are you taking her to court, she's losing your business.


People should just behave decently - that's my personal manifesto. If she can't step up then hit her where it hurts.

I would back-up Small Claims although I never use it as a threat I always intend to do it if they don't agree, I just give them the option beforehand.


I have settled with BP, HMRC and Dell Computers Inc. that way.


Add on the cost of the small claims application, the dry cleaning bill and any other costs you feel you actually incur.


The woman sounds unreasonable and may well believe she is correct and 'in the right', however the magistrate (or whatever he's called) will likely agree with you.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well GG - that is impressive - If I ever need a

> legal adviser but can't afford a lawyer I now know

> where to go.


Oh please don't MM. I know nothing about the law - except that it's an ass. The small claims court really is much more about who is right and who is wrong. It's brilliant.

Thank you for your responses. Yes, I think I will charge the full price of the jacket. I said ?60 before I found it on the internet...so that's her punishment (price goes up when you ask too many questions ;-)).


She is not only loosing me as a customer, but also my friend - we have already found a new gym.


Thanks again!

Hi Queen of Dulwich,


Just a precautionary note. Before heading for the small claims court, you should ideally have tried to sort the matter out beforehand. I know you say you have, but I would urge you to put this in writing purely for evidential purposes - just lay out the facts and your claim and give them a time limit in which to act (e.g. 14 days). This alone may well prompt them to settle. However, if they don't, write a second letter heading it "Letter Before Action". Not only should this set out your claim, but it should also state that you have had no response to your previous letter. If you do not do this, before taking the gym to court, the court may find that you have acted unreasonably and may penalise you by reducing (or even disallowing) the amount of your claim.


Good Luck.

I just wanted to reiterate how very very very easy the whole Small Claims Court application thing is. It honestly could not get any easier.


- You fill out an online form. You give details of both parties (you and the gym owner). You explain what has happened in simple language (i.e. you don't need a lawyer).


- You pay a fee (can't remember how much but it is not excessive - ?40 ish)


- The gym owner is sent a copy of the claim. She can then either (a) deny the claim - if she does this she'll need to have a good reason for doing so, and claiming that you don't have a receipt for your jacket will simply not fly or; (b) admit the claim and pay you the money for your jacket plus the court fees.


If she has any sense at all she will not let it get as far as the small claims court. Write her a stifly worded letter claiming the full cost of the coat and your dry cleaning expenses. Tell her that if you don't receive the funds within 7 days then you will proceed to the small claims court immediately. Remind her that if you take the matter further you will also be claiming all court expenses. Also tell her that you are very disappointed in her response to date and that she has lost a customer.

"If she has any sense at all she will not let it get as far as the small claims court. Write her a stifly worded letter claiming the full cost of the coat and your dry cleaning expenses. Tell her that if you don't receive the funds within 7 days then you will proceed to the small claims court immediately. Remind her that if you take the matter further you will also be claiming all court expenses. Also tell her that you are very disappointed in her response to date and that she has lost a customer."


Or, in other words...


 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi, my daughter has a basic electric keyboard she really should clear out of her old room. It's a classic beginners one. Are you interested?  If so, I'll photograph it and find the name.    Lottie 
    • I don’t think Reform will withstand the heat of any election.  Finding enough people to stand will be bad enough. Finding credible ones quite a bid tougher  I think yes this government is lacking in a long term plan and has not had a good first year. Today the least.   but the speed with which this was dealt with is a notable shift compared to last 14 years where months would drag by and we would constantly be told to draw a line under  if Labour called an election tomorrow, there is not a single party that could present a better alternative with any credibility. And that’s a low bar Reform are dangerous lunatics but more worrying is the descent of the Tories into the same swamp i also worry that England voters have contracted some melodrama virus after the Tories where we had 5 PMs in almost as many years  it’s ok for governments to be unpopular without needing to have an election every 1-2 years       Looks like Lucy Connolly will me one of those Reform candidates at next election tells you everything you need to know about that party and where the country would be headed 
    • Well, I made £50 out of it and Alice owes me another bullseye, so I had a good day Clearly the thread has moved on, but just a final few words on Rayner (from me, at least). If she hadn't gone like this (with a chance to revive her career at some point in the future) there's plenty of other stuff loaded up and ready to be fired at her about the motivation, finances and machinations of her move down South. It's not pretty reading. Tawdry doesn't come close. I was born in Ashton Hospital and grew up in Tameside, I've got a lot of friends and family who weren't as lucky as me and didn't make it out, some close to her constituency party, and there's been a lot of bad feeling around 'Our Ange' for a long time. My favourite quote was: 'She should fuck off back to Stockport.' And that was from a party member. The writing was on the wall for her. Moving from Ashton (majority c6.5k, large Pakistani minority, but predominantly white working class and targeted by both the Independent Alliance and Reform) to Hove (majority c20k, neither of these issues with the electorate) was a pretty cynical move, and she's fucked it royally. 'The Honourable Member for Hove and Portslade' will be sleeping a lot easier in their bed tonight. This thread was never supposed to about Labour bashing, and I'm not sure it is. It's definitely descended into 'Whataboutery', and that seems to be the problem, in my mind at least, with British politics. It's playground stuff, he said/she said, blame-game bollocks. Watch PMQs and ask yourself if you'd accept this sort of behaviour amongst toddlers, let alone in an elected parliament. One thing that does stand out is the opposition to Reform across the board, and yet we seem to be sleepwalking towards a likely scenario where Farage could head up a minority Reform government. I've 'followed' politics since the late Seventies - mainly because the BBC News came on right after 'Roobard and Custard' or 'The Magic Roundabout' - and I can't remember an era where both major parties are so bereft of leadership, direction or ideas. There's a certain irony that we'll all be getting a test text on Sunday to warn us of an impending 'National Emergency'. Seems quite prescient.
    • But not old enough to remember the highest unemployment rate, inflation and interest rates in history in the early eighties under the Tories? A rather selective memory you have. There has never been a four-day week: it was a three-day week imposed by the Conservative government under the Blasted Heath.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...