benmorg Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > It sounds like the same person and his MO seems to be following single vulnerable victims from the > train station late at night. So it should be possible for the police to catch him by installing > some CCTV around the station. Surely the fact that he threatened to kill merits extra attention from > the police and a bit of investment in extra surveillance. This guy deserves to be locked up > for years. Good lord, why do people think CCTV is the answer to these problems? Let's think this through. The police could: 1) Install a CCTV camera. With the pole, the camera, the cabling and the comms, this would take about six months and cost rather a lot of money. They would also have to monitor the camera, which will either be dedicated monitoring station (more money) or part of a wider monitoring system, which means there would be quite a chance that anyone being mugged wouldn't be noticed. Also, since cameras have limited visibility, there would need to be a number of cameras, increasing both the cost and the probability that any mugging would be missed. 2) Go all old fashioned and deploy a couple of plain clothes police. Or even uniformed ones, if you want a deterrent effect. On the other hand, CCTV does allow you to watch a replay of your mugging afterwards, possibly in slow motion, so it's not all money wasted, is it?