Sue

tomszekeres Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Another addition to the various refilleries on > Lordship Lane ? and looks like they've got quite > an extensive collection of produce/wine/cleaning > products they're going to be offering (spoke to > the owner and it's going to be ready for business > tomorrow). > > So in total that makes: > > Food > - As Nature Intended > - Organic Village Market > > Cleaning Products: > - Karavan Eco > - As Nature Intended > > Wine: > - Terroirs > - Cave de Bruno > - Organic Village Market > > Any others I've missed off the list? Gather in Bellenden Road does both refillable food and cleaning products. Organic Village has had refillable wine for ages, I think. I haven't actually tried it though. Is it any good?

That's very heartwarming!

christo Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Hi Sue! > I'm wondering which Sue that might be? > Yours has been the only response so far, must say > I'm a bit disappointed, but then it has been a > long time. Sorry but I've only been here nearly twenty years. After your time. I knew the Uplands, though :)

I don't know, but you can phone them to find out on 020 8693 1833 :)

Well I think it must be, because there was a notice up saying that the pool was closed due to the water temperature.

norahhanscom6be Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- If there's > something that defines all men than that's > fighting and betting. It's in our blood. It doesn't define any of the men I've ever known. Thank God.

goldilocks Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > The issues re residents and shops are relevant > considerations - but not necessarily a reason not > to close the road to vehicle traffic between > defined times. For example the road could be > closed between 'Willow' and Lodrship Lane, with > access only for deliveries at certain times. > > I understand that on occasions people living above > the shops on the left or in the very few houses on > the right hand side of the road as you walk > towards Lordship would need deliveries, but > realistically these could be made from parking > next to the closure. > > It would definitely be transformative for the > businesses along that area and make it a more > appealing area to spend time Sorry to be dim, but I can't see how it would make much difference, even in the Summer months. There are relatively few shops, restaurants and cafes there, and surely if you are going there to shop or to eat/drink you are going to spend most of your time inside the shops/restaurants/cafes? Except on market days. Unless you are sitting on the seats outside The Palmerston (which are for customers only, of which I have not been one since it changed hands) or on the seat down by the photos. Which people do anyway, though the road is not closed off. Have I missed something? Quite probably :)

Mahoody Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Sue Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > That's ridiculous. > > > > Surely they need a signature as proof of > delivery. > > Why did you say "That's ridiculous"? > > You obviously have not had a deliver from Amazon > recently. > > I get many deliveries from Amazon and no signature > was required. Yodel however do still take a > signature. Should you want an accurate appraisal > of the various courier companies, then just PM me. I try not to use Amazon, but I have had deliveries from them. I can't remember who was the courier and whether they wanted a signature. I've just had a parcel from Hermes, who did require a signature. The other side of this issue is that some people claim they have not receive items when they have. I understand that this has been a particular problem with eBay. It has put me off selling anything on eBay, as I have read that eBay always sides with the buyer. I don't know if that is true.

Penguin68 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I suspect that as soon as the election is over and > Labour safely reelected in this constituency the > trees will be gone. Helen Hayes is a brilliant MP, and if she is on the case I doubt that will happen without a very good reason. Although, this is basically a council matter, isn't it?

rahrahrah Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > When are the council going to properly > pedestrianise North Cross Road? Would be great > with some street furniture and planting etc. Well, the people who live there may not be too happy about that .... Nor may the shops and restaurants which need deliveries .....

seenbeen Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Sue Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > seenbeen Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- > > > we are now in the season for idling > > > engines...there is a form to fill in > > anonymously > > > on the Southwark website for 'idling > hotspots' > > and > > > smoking chimneys > > > > > > Really? Do you have a link? Thanks! > > https://www.southwark.gov.uk/environment/air-quali > ty/air-quality-queries-and-complaints Thanks for this link. What is an "idling hotspot"? One where various vehicles sit with their engines on at different times? There doesn't seem to be any way to report a single vehicle?

Apparently a boiler is not working. They are hoping to get it fixed by the end of the week but can't be sure. :( :( :(

seenbeen Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > we are now in the season for idling > engines...there is a form to fill in anonymously > on the Southwark website for 'idling hotspots' and > smoking chimneys Really? Do you have a link? Thanks!

DulwichFox Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Sue Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > DulwichFox Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- > > > The Money could of been spent on something > more > > > beneficial to the local Community. > > > > > > The Children at Heritage Park Primary School > in > > > Peterborough rasised ?25,000 > > > to pay for Outside Gym Equipment on their > > playing > > > field. > > > > > > > > > https://www.heritageparkschool.co.uk/_includes/ima > > > > > > > > > ges/gallery/95/thumb-IMG_0560.jpghttps://www.herit > > > > > > > > > ageparkschool.co.uk/_includes/images/gallery/95/th > > > > > > > > > umb-IMG_0567.jpghttps://www.heritageparkschool.co. > > > > > > > > > uk/_includes/images/gallery/95/thumb-DAL_4808.JPG > > > > > > If only Southwark Council had more > imagination. > > A > > > similar facility on Goose Green Perhaps. > > > Not just for children. For adults too. > > > > > > > > > https://www.heritageparkschool.co.uk/gallery/?pid= > > > > > > 3&gcatid=2&albumid=95 > > > > > > > > > There is outdoor gym equipment in both Dulwich > > Park and Peckham Rye Park. > > ... and probably in Crystal Palace Park ??? and > Possibly in Burgess Park > > But not Local in East Dulwich where money was made > available Dulwich Park and Peckham Rye Park are both within easy walking distance, though! And those parks are large enough that the outdoor gym equipment doesn't spoil the appearance of the park.

mynamehere Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > If you go on this walk I think all will be > revealed.anyhow you can ask questions and vent > 😉 > > https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/street-art-walk-tic > kets-80892903853?fbclid=IwAR31ctmLOxH7ylNf6YkVyyZD > UZRBLu4TapKl93z6--UcBOlSO-dlJ9wPPfU > > Dulwich Picture Gallery I went on one of these walks some years back, with Ingrid Beazley (R.I.P.) and if memory serves it only covered the street art which was based on pictures at the gallery. It may have changed, of course, but I guess even if it hasn't maybe they will know something about this mural.

herne hilly Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > my guess is a car wash or block of flats ;) I doubt it will be a car wash? There's one just up the road at DHFC.

DulwichBorn&Bred Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > That design was voted > for.....https://www.instagram.com/p/B3hZX7sHPw3/?i > gshid=1utzs35pc5ts8 > Not my kind of thing either but at least it?s > bright. The only positive I can find. Who voted for it? I live nearby, and don't remember being asked to vote.

DulwichFox Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > The Money could of been spent on something more > beneficial to the local Community. > > The Children at Heritage Park Primary School in > Peterborough rasised ?25,000 > to pay for Outside Gym Equipment on their playing > field. > > https://www.heritageparkschool.co.uk/_includes/ima > ges/gallery/95/thumb-IMG_0560.jpghttps://www.herit > ageparkschool.co.uk/_includes/images/gallery/95/th > umb-IMG_0567.jpghttps://www.heritageparkschool.co. > uk/_includes/images/gallery/95/thumb-DAL_4808.JPG > > If only Southwark Council had more imagination. A > similar facility on Goose Green Perhaps. > Not just for children. For adults too. > > https://www.heritageparkschool.co.uk/gallery/?pid= > 3&gcatid=2&albumid=95 > There is outdoor gym equipment in both Dulwich Park and Peckham Rye Park.

I'd be happy to take them off your hands! I can use them on my allotment!

yummumbums Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > We?ve just had 2 reasonably well dressed ladies > knock our door and ask if we know anyone who > speaks Portuguese! When told no they disappeared > pretty quickly. We are on Ulverscroft rd. Anyone > had anything similar today? Seems really odd! Yes I had this yesterday on Ulverscroft Road. Very strange question. It wasn't clear if they were looking for a specific Portuguese person or Portuguese speakers in general. I suggested they post on here rather than go house to house! It didn't really occur to me until now that they might have some ulterior motive. I thought the second person was a child, but I only caught a glimpse of them from the back,so it could have been a quite small adult.

first mate Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > If true that is a pretty poor use of public money. > Is there anyone who can confirm the cost and > whether a council commission? In my view it has no > merit whatsoever. Are we still talking about the one in North Cross Road? I don't think it's finished yet. I sincerely hope not.

That's ridiculous. Surely they need a signature as proof of delivery.

first mate Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > It seems part of the justification for posting > photos is that dog fouling is a criminal offence > and it's nasty...all true. However, other forms of > littering are also a criminal offence. Suppose I > decide to post up pictures of people I see dumping > ciggie butts or empty beer bottles, or chicken > bones? What about footballers who publicly urinate > on Peckham Rye- another criminal offence- These things do not get on your shoes or buggy wheels and then into your house, get on children, or cause blindness in children.

Yep

Are people suggesting that KidKruger has posted a picture of a woman on here who was just a random person passing by? With no good reason for doing it? Come on ....