Milo Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Narnia Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > reggie Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- > > > Milo > > > You are right, I am not sure. > > > I seem to have my own hole. > > > Reggie > > > Milo Wrote: > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > ----- > > > > Reggie, > > > > > > > > Regarding your 'hole' number one, how do > you > > > know > > > > work is immenent on the house? I live next > to > > a > > > > flat conversion development, permission for > > > which > > > > was granted in 1999, work didn't start > until > > > two > > > > years ago. > > > > > > My understanding is that planning permission is > > only valid for a certain period of time and > > nothing like 9/10 years.I presume once it > lapses > > you have to reapply. Thus I'm pretty sure Milo > is > > incorrect on this point. > \ > > Incorrect on what point?! I don't want to get into > a debate about Metaphysics, but the point I made > did actually happen. Planning permission for the > development near my house was put in for during > 1999, building work didn't start until late 2007, > these things actually occurred, no grey areas, no > opinion. > > You're not "pretty sure" Narnia, and similarly > Reggie it's not that you are "not sure", you're > both just making things up, like many of the > posters on this forum. That's what people do when > they're hiding their real motivations. Well f*ck you too. Making it up my arse. What are my motivations then Milo? Talk about 'tales from the lazy acre'!