flocker spotter

that is a huge amount for electricity - unless you have some furtive hydroponics going on in the attic. First bills often have adjustments on them for previous estimates etc- best to check whether the previous supplier has credited you back anything as well - ours did some stuff to correct the accounts after handover

using his head to bust of out a burning plane was probably a high point

I read that as nobody has to read Hemmingway which I fully agree with

the lead protagonist on this seems to be Rebecca Lush (coincidence) - lots of previous going back to twyford. Also Tamsin Omond is in the mix somewhere - this niche is brim full of toffs

Please tell me that you are joking - why would anyone send an unsolicited hate PM to someone they have not met ? this surely cannot be commonplace

the impotence of being ernest

JoeLeg Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > flocker spotter Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Lush has a long history of activism.there is > > plenty out there if you could be arsed to > google > > it. > > > I think this was crudely done though, like they > left it to the intern to figure out. The essential > message got lost behind what looks like a blunt > attack on all police officers. > > Activism is good, this was stupid. Possibly badly delivered but the avalanche of negative comments in the crappy press and online does not seem to derive from any reasoned consideration of the (admittedly jumbled) issues presented, just hot steamy knee jerkery action from hot gammon jerks.

Lush has a long history of activism.there is plenty out there if you could be arsed to google it.

how many times have you posted this up?

JohnL Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Of course no government will admit it's policies > kill people - would be political suicide.. of course, but it is all about what is politically tolerable. As much as the headline grabbing incidents are bad news for all involved, it does - rightly or wrongly - lead to the question about how communities( and their members) are ranked and the loading involved in making these economic decisions- if people were being shanked and shot on a daily basis in Chelsea, the situation & outcomes would likely be far different

ALD are well organised and will take pretty anything and select what they need and move the rest on. If you have no leanings either way, it is far better to focus on Human charities rather than animal ones, as domestic pet charities are proportionatly overepresented in the charity sector

hmmmmmm....

violent crime cannot be totally removed but it can be controlled, most often by cash funding. unfortunately , this is an exponetial costing problem - the fat tails are the hardest and most costly to cover, so tolerance risk models are used to determine the best confidence scenario & provide some kind of acceptable balance. These fat tails take the form of dead young men these days. the accceptable output of a risk model that has accepted a certain level of fatality as part of the cost cutting. the UKG has accepted this level of slaughter as part of its never ending austerity programme. these dead young men are the direct result of cold number crunching.

now that the yax -lennon thread shouting has died down abit, maybe it would be possible to move the conversation one step further.Lets assume that Yax isnt the issue here- this has been touched on several times on here, but i feel that he is merely a symptom of some kind of larger societal malaise & by shouting about the yx misses the point somewhat.shouty populists do not grow and flower in places with a sunny outlook. By focusing on the symptoms - brexit/ yaxley/conspiracy loonery/ mistrust of people in positions in authority/ peadophile fear etc - we miss the cause of the problem. what is going on and what does this tell us about the health of UK society at the minute ? Without being patronising - as if - outside London and the odd larger metropolitan area- the majority of the country are not happy with their lot. yes, there are local triggers and local pressures in the background that take the headlines , but what is going on, on a wider level, what is the cause of this perspective?

sillywoman Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > "we are lucky to have these fine establishments so > close to us" > > What utter poppycock. These fine establishments do > nothing to benefit the lives of me or mine, and > only serve to irritate and aggravate with their > loud, arrogant, drug taking students hanging > around our streets and arrogant, monster-truck > driving parents using our near by roads as a free > car park or racetrack on tier way to drop little > Johnny at school - not to mention their teachers > using us a car park since they built over their > quadrangle parking. How on earth do you think they > are of any benefit to people living near them? In > what way do they benefit 'us'. What an ignorant > comment. Tchk! I am taking the piss

words. lots of words.

we are lucky to have these fine establishments so close to us

Peckhamgatecrasher Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > If Hawkwind were playing, I would have been > straight there. word

why does this have harry and Meghan all over it? we never did get any progress on this

you realise that this thread is an easter egg by the OP. designed to provide side splitting mirth for the poster for weeks to come. Rage, rage against the dying of the light.

hmm Can I hear a cuckoo calling?

JoeLeg Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Precisely. > > When moderates and centrists refuse to have > difficult conversation like immigration and > segregation, they automatically cede the debate to > the extreme edges. Reasonable, tolerant people > suddenly find themselves accused of all sorts of > nonsense and have no way back in. > > Is there a problem with immigration? Well, a lot > of people seem to think so, so we should be > talking abut it. But we don?t, so only the idiots > get airtime, and they make tremendous headway > before anyone else has realised the race is on. > > ETA - I was responding to an erudite and > reasonable post from flocker who has now deleted > it, not sure why. sorry, it seemed to be stating the obvious and was dragging in periperahl/ not so perihperal issues like brexit.

oh

your PassAgg default response does you no favours

evasive response