flocker spotter

That is a poor and lazy response from Network Rail. A temporary change from one way to two way on Lyndhurst with accompanying traffic lights to reduce likelihood of collision would make much more sense.

granted , the OKR is a wasteland for pubs compared to its heyday decades ago - but you mention the heaton- there are still more places to drink in the rye lane area than ever before. and some of them are still crap if that is your bag

Kings OTR was terrible TBH. when the taxi office next door had a sign up saying *no drug runs* you knew this was a bad place

Louisa Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > flocker spotter Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Louisa Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- > > > What?s so difficult to understand. It?s not > the > > > current building that?s necessarily > important. > > > It?s the site, the name, what stood there > > > previously. All interconnected over numerous > > > centuries. Not many people (as far as I?m > > aware), > > > are arguing for the pub to reopen. But > > something > > > sympathetic to the history of location > wouldn?t > > go > > > amiss. We all just want to see the > > site/building > > > reused again. > > > > > > Louisa. > > > > > > facts not waffle - what is so special about > this > > site. > > When it comes to waffle, you?re the expert. You > seem to spew BS quite regularly on here, most of > which is a poor attempt to troll. Boring. > > Back on topic, the site is important and the facts > speak for themselves. The link provided above > explains the history of this site, and to at least > retain the name, aspects of the building would be > good. Look at lost locations such as The Kings > Arms, where a ugly block of flats now stand. > > Louisa. I am a troll because I ask for some kind of reasoning behind your stance? utterly bizarre

the pub / history issue is a bit moot - there is no harm in wanting the location to be used properly but weak historical justification isn't helpful. Its a terrible, dirty polluted location, potentially dangerous for pedestrians to access with the present layout and subject to the whims of the landowner - what realistically could be built there that would provide benefit?

Louisa Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > What?s so difficult to understand. It?s not the > current building that?s necessarily important. > It?s the site, the name, what stood there > previously. All interconnected over numerous > centuries. Not many people (as far as I?m aware), > are arguing for the pub to reopen. But something > sympathetic to the history of location wouldn?t go > amiss. We all just want to see the site/building > reused again. > > Louisa. facts not waffle - what is so special about this site.

Why is the building important ? half of London is 1920s stock. I fail to see why the site is any more important that any other long established road junction in the manor. There are more bars and cafes serving alcohol on LL than at any time I can remember since the late 80s. Can anyone provide a cognisant argument for its rehabilitation as F&D outlet ?

I think you good folk of ED need a refresher on what is worth of consideration as a place of historical interest. A pub from the 1920s that Thatcher may have driven past really doesn't make the grade, however you spin it. it died out as it is in a terrible location and cannot economically justify being a food and drink outlet - no one with any sense would trek up to this polluted wasteland for a night out.

hardly a place of note is it?

Louisa Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > It?s a shocking mess. A site of significant > cultural and historical importance to Dulwich, > left to rot. > > > Louisa. hyperbole r us

rahrahrah Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > The accusation of homophobia, is ridiculous. > Describing the two men as being a couple is simply > that, a description. also, it seems to massively > miss the point, which is that the OP's wife was > verbally abused in the park, which is a pretty > horrible experience. This forum is getting beyond > parody. > > To also pick on the choice of wording used and > argue over the definition of 'assault' - I mean, > come on people. > > If someone said they were run over by a lorry, > driven by a white man, with red hair, would you > offer support, or argue that a lorry can't run and > that the drivers ethnicity is irrelevant. With what gender did the lorry driver identify with?

not a useful comparison of anything apart from how larger, less densely populated countries likely to have more trees

if - as now generally accepted in the sunny daylight of the post Brexit referendum landscape - the UKG is a delivery method for the will of the people, then surely UKG Home Office actions are a derivate of the peoples will.

Georgia. not the American one obvs

Public transport work is usually for the greater benefit of society. a little disruption may inconvenience the average driver for a short period, but this isn't the end of the world is it ?

its a meeting of minds on here.

to be fair though, the fewer audi drivers on the roads, the better for humanity

I would be surprised if a builder would quote on this unless he has understanding of the structure of the existing dormer construction - have you had an engineers reports done ?

get them waggons into a circle boys.

Sue Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > flocker spotter Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > It is > > also a shame that your post has spun off into a > > petty bicker thread. Again > > > > You think it's "petty bickering" to suggest that > reporting suspicious behaviour to the police is a > good idea? > > You have a strange idea of petty bickering :)) Don't do this. It is tiresome.

its all the fault of the oirish anyway https://www.irishpost.com/news/ireland-undermined-british-government-100-years-itv-presenter-receives-backlash-controversial-comments-154405

No one in the tory party wants May to jump ship unless she can carry the baggage of brexit with her. she is a useful idiot until she is no longer required. The raison d'etre behind brexit is not about change,it never was, it is about the continuity, consolidation and affirmation of what already exist.

It is standard practice to get your locks replaced. We were missing a bundle of keys after a burglary and had a bit of a tussle with the insurers on the day of discovery but finally got them to agree for the entire external locking setup to be replaced with Banhams gear. Always worth pushing to see if they will do this

bread and circuses

thanks for the heads up OP - its a shame these things have to be posted up on a local MB. It is also a shame that your post has spun off into a petty bicker thread. Again