flocker spotter

The issue was never ID cards per se, although it did come across this way, the issue was being mandated to carry them. Gordon Jackson and Richard Attenborough got away with home made papers in the great escape however. Ish. Good luck.

utterly nuts. is it a full moon ? Why the urge to assign blame for every single incident. Get a grip.

This thread is nuts.

Sally Eva Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Have you tried Charlton Lido? 50m. Heated and lots > of space even on sunny days. Walk straight in. Sssshhh! Sally Eva - this was S London's best kept secret.

as an aside, i have just come back from LL. lots of A boards outside the shops section of their pavement (assuming they have one ). Most of these business are long established and have been here for sometimes decades. They are also, strangely enough, the first to attempt to marshall support when an issue that may impact their profitability arises.

I Attacked ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion

uncleglen Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/948785/Windrush- > scandal-Theresa-May-Jeremy-Corbyn-news-Andrew-Neil > -BBC-This-Week > > according to this Gordon Brown ordered the > destruction of the Landing Passes in 2009, which > for some people was the only proof they had as > they had never acquired a passport or > citizenship. > Of course- NO-ONE is going to believe it-are they? > especially on the libtardfest that is the EDF "Libtard" c. Liberal retard How apt that in a thread about effective discrimintion, this nugget of workdplay pops up. a touch of class

I can only relay what I have heard. I cannot engage in a discussion of cartesian dualism on a local forum powered mostly by the raw energy of seething passive aggressive barely hidden fury

their mini fleet of R5's seems to have gone also.

simples end of period

there is a ghost in heber apparently - not seen I myself but it was discussed a few years back and the tale seems to have spanned a few generations of students from what people were saying. Maybe not good to mention this to the current cohort as it seems to have dropped of the rumour radar. eta an onsite caretaker who dies in mysterious circumstances years ago was mentioned as being the ghost

Surely Goose Green is the bottom of Lordship Lane?

I am merely added a Rousseau/Proudhon slant to an errant wayward beef. I Shall take my leave from the ring and watch from the cheap seats now. Good luck

Mick Mac Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > heartblock Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Amber Rudd?s assertion that records were > destroyed > > as ?data protection? isn?t actually true. > Windrush > > manifests with the same sort of personal data > are > > legally viewable, through searches on line as > > proven by a very well respected art historian. > The > > data was destroyed on Theresa May?s watch I > > believe, probably to save money rather than > > anything else - but does show how much they > don?t > > care about certain sectors of our community. I > > can?t believe people support and vote for these > > awful people. > > TM says today that the decision to destroy records > was a Labour decision. > > Are you tempted to retract how it reflects on TM, > or say that its Labour that care less about > sectors of community? This isn't a binary issue. Neither side are able to bask in the glow of glory here. To reduce it to finger pointing is imbecilic and childish, leading to the inevitable death spiral of deceit and evasive fictions. We are now seeing the gerrymandering of the discussion into a polarisation between subjective good and bad migrants. Its still finger pointing and it still purposefully fails to attack the root of the problem. Windrush have been grudgingly approved, now we can move onto the next tranche for demonisation with added legitimised gusto It all gets so confusing, maybe there should be able to easily identify those who walk amongst as being different ? any historical precedent we could adopt for this task ?

I am not wrong here nor is my comment in any way misplaced.

of course shops can do what they want on their own land within reason, this does not however absolve them of responsibility should the public access that land as a matter of course.If the shop puts an A board on their property, then they also have to assume the liability for issues that may occur wrt that A board and a member of the public who rightfully have reason to be on that land. The shopkeepers cannot have their cake and eat it. So many lawyers in ED, yet so much guff remains uncorrected

mikeb Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > hope no-one is hurt. Looks like it might be > 60-62, some of which dates from the 17th century > > http://peckhamheritage.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2 > 017/03/Peckham_THI_Repair_and_Restoration_Proposal > s_Feb2014.pdf is it listed etc ? ] Wonder how the fire started - lets hope it wasn't one of those rather too frequent disused piers going on fire incidents

Won't anything think of the retailers?

Try Airbnb or booking.com. Both provide the opportunity to search by number of beds as well as bedrooms, so you are more likely to find something suitable. I know it isn't a package, but it is easy to sort flights and carhire or taxi transfers.

It isn't illegal; salons are just advised against it because the products have not been tested on people under 16 and there is a possibility (as with anyone) of a dermatological reaction. It is a precaution only.

Just post it up publicly in the whats one section and it will then be visible for all to see.

eastDAG Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > flocker spotter Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Who are you and how do you have permission for > > this artwork? > > > > you failed to answer any questions last time, > now > > is an ideal opportunity to make good that > mistake > > Thank you for your interest in our group. As > already mentioned the group consists of local > residents, businesses and market traders and are > supported by Southwark Council. The call for > people to get involved is ongoing and has been in > local magazines and on this forum. We really hope > you can come along to meetings and bring your > passion to the project. Please do drop us an > email and get involved. when is the next meeting & will it be advertised for public access?

nxjen Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > From the article that post is linked to: > > "The mural will be part of a wider project which > includes community lead enhancements to North > Cross Road Market and installations of lamp post > banners." > > So despite your coyness on the previous thread, > you are the organisation behind the ghastly banner > project. Mural good - banners rubbish. > > http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5 > ,1899568,1899568#msg-1899568 Evasive shadowy organisations. We had a call out thread for the Neo nazi posters recently on here- There is less information out these for eastdag than there is for the NN. Why would anyone want to have anything to do with your group eastDAG ?

Who are you and how do you have permission for this artwork? you failed to answer any questions last time, now is an ideal opportunity to make good that mistake

JohnL Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Trumps fervent followers swear there will be no > war and Trump will bring Assad to the negotiating > table after a load of threats (to be fair it > seemed to work on Kim - was it luck? ). > > KJU has outplayed trump at every juncture - KJU is playing chess to Trumps snakes and ladders here- The DPRK wants, indeed requires, constant brinkmanship to ensure its survival. The current situation could last for years, every day lessens the likelyhood of the already unlikely prospect of a US attack or forced regime change. Trump has been done like a kipper and the Kims power is further consolidated.