
malumbu
Member-
Posts
7,152 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Forums
Events
Blogs
FAQ
Tradespeople Directory
Jobs Board
Store
Everything posted by malumbu
-
Asked this question a few weeks ago - a couple more suggestions http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?20,1691783,1692319#msg-1692319
-
Why are buses travelling more slowly? Blame Ocado....(and others).
malumbu replied to Nigello's topic in The Lounge
Oh and the lack of enforcement eg parking on double yellows. Just see how much disruption this causes to buses every day on Rye Lane. I think this thread is dead now. -
Greenwich foot tunnel - cycling permitted (sometimes)
malumbu replied to rendelharris's topic in The Lounge
Wow - if only we could have a more sensible and proportionate approach elsewhere eg - there are no pedestrians at the lights, you can cycle throughh. That will get you Daily Mail readers all angry. -
So we voted to leave Europe, on part because the masses rejected our faith in the free market and the inequalities that this led to. Yet pubs, many of which we should value as community assets and should have some sort of protection, are run to maximise profit beit turning into trendy restaurants or selling off/knocking down as they are more valuable for other uses. Scores of successful or what could be successful beautiful pubs have been ruined across London - those on the Dulwich Estate, the Dulwich Woodhouse, many lovely pubs in the Youngs Estate. This is not defending pubs where there simply isn't enough demand. Although it is a shame where you have development of warehouse style or duplex, developments such as the Oval Quatier or more down market lower Sydenham that there will be no demand for treasured pubs yet a Pret, Costa or McDs will be packed. Good to see that Antic are bucking the trend in the Elephant probably recognising that with the large developments coming on line and some good brand awareness it can work. Back to my whinge - the Dog was a popular pub. Why not leave it that way?
-
Why are buses travelling more slowly? Blame Ocado....(and others).
malumbu replied to Nigello's topic in The Lounge
Lots of reasons buses are travelling slower - or journey times longer. Or less faster speeds or less shorter journey times Roadworks and increaased traffic including increased population More workplace deliveries in particular Amazon in central London Roadworks associated with the Cycle Superhighway, Crossrail and the continued resedential and office developments - for example the Shard screwed up the London Bridge area for yonks Reduced bus lanes and vehicle lanes due the CS Smaller vans as there is a shortage of qualified drivers for larger vehicles and the pool of old gits like me that can drive 3.5 - 7.5 tonnes is getting smaller Possibly longer dwell times on lights to give greater priority to pedestrians Black cabs roaming around without customers as a legacy of the highly protected market (try getting a bus on the strand at about 10.30 and just see). This is a mixture of informed and casual views. I'm not aware of the impact of home deliveries vs old school shopping. What I do know is you don't have to lengthen bus journeys by much to reduce demand and people to return to their cars. IF you want to get people out of cars then make it difficult for them and make cycling more attractive. Hopefully that bus driver's son/geezer is onto this. Of course it is all the EU's fault so things will magically improve when we leave. Actually some common standards would not go amiss for example (can't remember why) there was a rejection of longer wheelbase buses in the UK. -
The worst is the one on Cheltenham Road, keep shop customers waiting for 30 mins, whilst they take telephone orders. Shocking.
-
Nothing wrong with this - there was a good campaign to use imgainative ways to pretest against Humvee's. Can't find the link though.
-
When Jimmy Saville and Rolf Harris were still seen as popular children's entertainers.....
-
The dreadful habit that people have slipped into of using an adjective as an adverb. So a bus may be slow. This is a relative term. But the buses don't go more slowly when compared to each other or another form of transport. They go slower. Things don't move more quickly. They move quicker or faster.
-
Why are buses travelling more slowly? Blame Ocado....(and others).
malumbu replied to Nigello's topic in The Lounge
Buses are driving slower not 'more slowly'. Slow is a comparative term. Compared to walking buses are faster. The World is a circle without a beginning and nobody knows where it really ends. Now all join in with the rest of the chorus. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z_gB9beh0bc I'll return with some serious comment. -
Yes in deed.
-
This is a great site but not sure how searchable http://www.classiccafes.co.uk/ I want to try the place on Herne Hill Road near to the taxi garage. Otherwise Forest Hill is pretty good.
-
Nobody interested in this. 12 of you advised on routes to the A1 (including me) but UK energy policy and becoming dependent on some questionable regimes (obviously the French) has no hits.
-
If they are left wing then perhaps they could express a view. First one would have been why stay in Europe (or why not) rather than tread the middle line.
-
How can I cross London to get to the A1 but avoiding congestion charge areas
malumbu replied to Cazz's topic in The Lounge
A13 good choice. At least to sing to. But not sure if you go this route why you don't do the A12 instead. Careful with tunnels as they get bloomin blocked to easy. -
How can I cross London to get to the A1 but avoiding congestion charge areas
malumbu replied to Cazz's topic in The Lounge
Alternative is to take the OK Road, the A road, the A13 It starts down in Wapping There ain't no stopping By-pass Barking and straight through Dagenham Down to Grays Thurrock And rather near Basildon Pitsea, Thundersley, Hadleigh, Leigh-On-Sea, Chalkwell, Prittlewell Southend's the end -
How can I cross London to get to the A1 but avoiding congestion charge areas
malumbu replied to Cazz's topic in The Lounge
Straight through, Vauxhall Bridge, Victoria, Park Lane, A5 and then stick on that (or take another aterial road eg A41 Finchley Road) out to the North Circ. You can go the other way too via Tower Bridge, and then through Angel and Archway. Both will be busy during peak hours. -
I've ranted about the cycle lane before - even if it was bright orange I am sure that it wouldn't make a difference. But to be fair I've walked into other cycle lanes in the past as it doesn't seem to be in our culture, for example like Denmark and the Netherlands. As for the kink at the end, it is a pain and does't flow, but then nor does that daft contraflow/gyratory at the Elephant. My main point is that I've not seen any bother between cyclsts and pedestrians in Peckham beyond the odd middle class do-gooder campaigns about our speeds on the canal path. The only conflict I had was when another cyclist got so close to me I clipped a pedestrian - I was the only one bothered as I wished the other cyclist a nice day. Not. Given up on the damage. Road is too narrow so buses mount the cycle path. Raised it with Southwark but their reply was "am I bothered" I'd defend cyclists to the hilt but then realised that it seemed to be cool to wear black, on a black bike with no lights.
-
I was quite excited to hear that the East Dulwich Forum is going to manage a new nuclear power station in Somerset. I was involved in the previous attempt - a public inquiry granted permission for a British built power station based on an American design, where replication and reliability was going to bring down costs. This was going to be the second of the first series of four, starting at Sizewell under the then PM (RH Margaret Thatcher's) commitment to the nuclear industry and state electricity generation. Economy of scale didn't happen. She subsequently got hijacked by the 'let's burn all of our indigenous gas supply' instead as the easier option for closing down the coal mines. I see that East Dulwich has teamed with the Chinese on this though. It seems to be that you are bending over backwards with our current and recent governments to accommodate the interests of this rogue state. I'd be a little careful if I was you. Would you let your wife or servants do this? [There is a serious thread here by the way - (a) the failure to have an energy policy for the last 30 years (b) the dangers of leaving supply to the market © the loss of a generation of nuclear engineers and the capability to do this stuff ourself (d) impact on carbon emissions and climate change (e) getting into bed with a dangerous partner (f) the irony that the French state is engaged in a privatised sector - as of course they and the Germans do in UK transport too (f) failure of five prime ministers of both persuasions (g) coal and coal mining is pretty horrible stuff but the decline and some sort of future could have been properly managed] Let digression commence..........
-
Can some one explain what this is all about? Some sort of lets have a survey on all important issues. A sort of Mrs Merton (RIP Caroline)when she'd have a debate with her elderly audience. The latest one starts off with 'being proud about how we are handling Brexit' (it's on immmigration). There is nothing to be proud about in respect to Brexit, in fact nothing to be proud about my nation full stop on this. Just unsubscribed but thought that I'd share my rant with EDF. Perhaps I will be enlightened and change my opinion.
-
You still need industrial relations beit 2 people or 20 people and you have a right to organised laboour. There are some issues that need sorting my your own admission - 'stupid mistakes'. Unless it is a workers cooperative or similar it is still out to maximise profits for the benefits of the owners/shareholders. Even John Lewis has to do this. This isn't marxist claptrap but the free market. We are all replacable!
-
We donated the cat to vetenerary science (not spell checking this) and would do the same for my remains (medical science). Aunt died at 92 in the spring and we did a humanist ceremony ourselves. It was the most excellent of send offs.
-
Speak to your trade union. If you are not a member join one. If you don't have one you appear to be motivated enough to bring one in - and better still represent your c0-workers. Best way of resolving grievances. And if for some reason you can't or don't want to have a formal trade union ask HR about a staff/management group (an informal TU). It is not all about conflict brother/sister.
-
Why do you want to go into peoples houses? Surely much better texting, snapchatting, Facebooking or whatever. I am being ironic.
-
Lucky me. Been on holiday for a week so missed being tugged by the OB. They have done this in the past. Yes we are a bit naughty but in the scale of things it is pretty near the bottom. The Council people were out doing it the other day so I told them to be useful and stop the pedestrians aimlessly walking across the cycle lane. But at the end of the day it is not a bad route and I never witness any rancour between pedestrians and cyclists (more likely to get bike on bike). Now, I'd already started thinking about more pressing issues before looking at the post above. But why don't they do more useful things like... catch criminals.... of more relevant do a few fines for cyclists without lights. Ideally a warning first for idiots like me who at this time of year forget that the nights are drawing in. They could also do the buses for mounting the cycle lanes and the numerous double line parkers. And those idiots on quad bikes and motorbikes. And the people who bloke the path by the library selling stuff or doing God bothering. And every other miscreant whilst they are at it. This started as a gentle post and now I've become Angry of Mayfair. And I was so chilled after my hols too...
East Dulwich Forum
Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.