Alan Medic

Rockets Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Alan, did you get the ticket for going along > Dulwich Village or Burbage. If it was the latter > you could claim the sign on Burbage is obscured > because of its position so forward on the > junction. Dulwich Village, Rockets.

Thanks alex_b. I think I'll just pay the fine if that's the case.

Perhaps a real indicator as to how long the PM will last is if a poll was done to find out how many people refer to him as Boris or Johnson. I'd say the overwhelming majority refer to him as 'Boris' currently but I'm hopeful that will change. The sooner the better please. I hate people calling him Boris. It isn't even his name ffs. He's not your friend and he really doesn't care about you.

doogsey Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Alan Medic Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Well I appealed. Anyone say how long it takes > to > > get a verdict? > > > I appealed in early May and have just received a > response (appeal rejected sadly), so the backlog > seems to currently be around 6 - 7 weeks. > > They do seem to put a decent effort into the > response though and generally respond to each > point raised, so kudos to the fines team at > Southwark. Nice to see the council working a bit > for their revenue. I had my appeal rejected though I'm thinking of disputing it. The email stating this was actually from a company called Apcoa Parking, though the use a Southward Parking email address. So I think it's fair to assume the Council is not dealing with these but have outsourced it. The Apcoa Group is made up of very wealthy companies (not surprisingly). The Ultimate Holding Company isn't even in the UK. This sign was used in their email stating that it's on College Road, which is the direction we approached Dulwich Village from. Has anyone any idea how long the sign has been there since I've no recollection of seeing it in early June?

Is 'lads' just an Irish thing?

ed26 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > C - Bearing in mind that a mask is designed to > stop us passing our germs onto others (a fact that > STILL seems to be lost on a lot of people they > interview on the TV) I'll wear a mask out of > respect and courtesy to others when I'm in a busy > environment, and I won't if it just seems > pointless. By 'pointless' I take it you mean when you are not around other people? There are masks that also give the wearer a good deal of protection, but like you say, people do seem to think by wearing whatever they are wearing, that they are predominately protecting themselves.

Wonder why that facility to block seeing posts by whoever, was got rid of?

Definitely A

diable rouge Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > 100... Just a hundred Red. Raise you 16,300!

16400

JohnL Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Alan Medic Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > JohnL Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- > > > notimpressed Wrote: > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > ----- > > > > Jog on mate- your probably a rugby fan, > where > > > they > > > > all sit together and discuss each others > > skiing > > > > trips. Please stick to it and do not try > and > > > come > > > > to football matches. > > > > > > Actually one of my favourite English rugby > > > players/political commentators seems to have > > gone > > > missing on twitter - hope he's back soon as I > > like > > > his posts :) > > > > Brian Moore? > > Yes - suspect a short ban on posting for > something he said about a tory activist (I maybe > wrong) :) > > Hope to hear more commentating from him too. Yeah, he doesn't take any sh*t. Though his last post to date was in response to someone saying they were going to report him to the police for threatening said tory activist.

JohnL Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > notimpressed Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Jog on mate- your probably a rugby fan, where > they > > all sit together and discuss each others skiing > > trips. Please stick to it and do not try and > come > > to football matches. > > Actually one of my favourite English rugby > players/political commentators seems to have gone > missing on twitter - hope he's back soon as I like > his posts :) Brian Moore?

Sephiroth Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Now, Aussie Rules crossed with Gaelic football - > THAT was a boisterous sport > > Those must be the 'Fightlights' I presume.

Thanks. I'll go with the short answer.

Thanks for organising RD. I'm surprised I was the only one to go for a drawn Final.

Last question please. Is it possible to print pages from a book on a Kindle?

keano77 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Interesting article from an EU point of view More like a factual point of view. The UK Govt. wants to wriggle out of what it agreed to when they 'got Brexit done'. Possibly their plan all along. It's a shameful place to be in for a once well respected country. Now it's just run by charlatans, the worst of all being the PM.

I predicted Italy to win too, but alas it counts as a draw in our game.

It appears no one got last night's result right. Am I right in thinking Lady G that you forgot to make a number of predictions in Round 1? If so the table might look a lot different if you hadn't...

That's what Mark Lawrenson predicts on the BBC Sport website. 0-0 with England winning the shoot out.

I can't see how Hancock can ever be taken seriously again as the health minister in a pandemic. For that reason alone he really has to go. Giving a substantial PPE contract to the woman's brother is almost what we expect from this shower. If he has broken 'the law' as it was then, shouldn't he face consequences? He was quite keen for Ferguson to do so.

Just checked and saw that the 'result' of matches includes extra time, if there is any. Half expecting it would be the score after 90 minutes.

tiddles Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Thanks Alan medic x Hi tiddles. Hope you read the post following mine. There are exceptions to the 28 day rule apparently, which the Council could fall back on. So say a couple of well informed posters above.

tiddles Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > A small landscaping business has just been hit > with a flurry of fines - but they have taken 2 > months to arrive which means they have been > accruing loads in the interim. Please no one > suggest they use a bicycle to transport heavy > materials?. Looking at appealing as this feels > just wrong for there to he such a delay in sending > out From what's written above in this thread, the council are legally obliged to issue a PCN within 28 days of the supposed offence. Otherwise it's invalid. I haven't researched this myself but I'm sure it could be easily checked.

Well I appealed. Anyone say how long it takes to get a verdict?