Maurice Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Marvelous! I'm not sure if the '5' is meant to be > an 'S', which is certainly not true. Well Maurice, as you may know, the second half of the postcode sequence begins with a number, rather than a letter. Therefore I felt a '5' rather than an 'S' would have looked more postcode=like. However, on reflection, I have foolishly omitted a number from the first part of the sequence, hence I shall amend my suggestion to: UR1 5NOB