Jah Lush

I meant Springsteen, obviously.

I think you've just answered *Bob's* question about who'd make a good headliner. Not a fan myself though.

Ker-ching!

Hmm... well to be honest I'm not really interested in the headline acts. Not interested in watching a band play in a field either. Too many people. I'd have preferred it if they'd shown more from the smaller stages. They can be found on iPlayer though. I'll stick to watching bands in small clubs.

Is it just me but I found the BBC's coverage of Glastonbury desperately dull this year and all the headline acts totally uninspiring. It really does suck corporate cock these days.

I had Costa Rica to win one-nil so was mightily pissed off when Greece equalised in the 90th minute.

Scores over 90 minutes or extra-time. Going to penalties doesn't count. I sure most of us had the same outcomes too. I know I did.

Testing it out for 2022. They'll need oxygen masks and a cardio vascular unit on standby for that one too.

I think they did on their second half performance and Hunterlaar made all the difference after he came on for Van Persie. Terrific game.

His statement to FIFA "In no way [did] it happen how you have described, as a bite or intent to bite. After the impact ... I lost my balance, making my body unstable and falling on top of my opponent. At that moment I hit my face against the player leaving a small bruise on my cheek and a strong pain in my teeth." He has no shame. Incredibly talented player/complete fucktard.

Pickle Wrote: holding one nostril and emptying the contents of the other onto the footpath is acceptable. All together now - Oh no it isn't.

Oh, you were doing so well until you misspelt "knickers".

Genius. http://i1369.photobucket.com/albums/ag237/jahlushhead/10427347_10152080286831853_1499433124761934994_n_zpscb28708f.jpg

Poor poor deluded man. You've got admire his positivity though. That's a man with his glass half full.

DaveR Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > "We will never know for sure if a legal team with > high connections within a government and the > establishment had any influence in determining a > not guilty verdict - but one would think, given > the nature of the case, it was always going to > lead to questions of corruption using a legal team > like that" > > I don't understand this at all? What are the > connections between the legal team within > government? What questions of corruption? I think the writer was possibly alluding to the fact the Prime Minister's barrister brother headed up the legal chambers that represented Rebecca Brooks.

A bite's a bit though. Maybe Saurez will go for an ear next time.

I see the Cowboy's had a bit of a surge up to the top (again). Is there no stopping him this year?

Yeah, mine too. And you're right about that edcam.

Tune!

Pay day.

Yuk!

I'm not sure. The thing was that I had no room for anything else so had to drastically reduce the amount of songs from the phone.

?50 million for Suarez? Read Madrid will bite Liverpool's hand off for that.

Nevertheless a superb article, very well written and researched.

I've got to say I'm a little surprised at your attitude towards this whole Suarez thing, Otta, even my Liverpool FC obsessed niece agrees with the decision and thinks he's a twat and that's saying something.