Jah Lush

Q: What got four legs and more money than Glasgow Rangers? A: Harry Redknapp's dog.

There is no way you could fit a Waitrose in the Old Bank restaurant and for a Sainos in Honor Oak Park forget about it. I think the original post is another wind-up.

What Glasgow Rangers fans are going through at the moment pales in comparison to what the Portsmouth fans have been through over the past few years. Still, I must say it is a very sad day for Scottish football. Where once it was a two horse race there is now only one team in it. Celtic may as well be handed the SPL on a plate now and for the next couple of seasons.

What's six inches long and won't be getting sucked on Valentines Day? . . . . . . . . Whitney Houston's crack pipe.

computedshorty Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > It is a shame you did not decide to move to > Overhill Road years ago. > There used to be a railway station in Wood Vale > called Honor Oak facing the Cemetery. Went the same way a Lordship Lane station didn't it? Closed around 1955.

They're parakeets not parrots.

rahrahrah Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > It's all an inevitable part of the gentrification > of ED. Give it ten years and we'll have pheasants > and peacocks mincing about. The pigeons are simply > being priced out of the area. And sparrows have practically disappeared completely. Which is very sad. I see all kinds of birds in my back garden but have to say that these days a sparrow is a very rare sight indeed. Oooh look there goes a blue tit.

Yay! If you hate it that much get out and do what you want. Life's too short to be stuck in a boring job.

Yeah. I wish you hadn't bothered.

Why bother.

I believe they'll be doing a tapas style menu along with the usual roasts on a Sunday. I've asked them to do fish pie and got a thumbs up for that.

I was going to mention Magpies but you've beaten me to it.

I always though the name change was silly and pointless. The history of that house is wrapped up in its original name. I've not been back there for about five years. The two dining experiences I had there were pretty awful and I've not heard any good things about it since. Did you dine there over the weekend Stevo? Would you care to tell us about it if you did?

Any advance on a hundred?

You're not wrong there.

Undisputedtruth Wrote: Evra's behaviour > is dragging the club down. Alex said clearly > Evra's behaviour could have caused a riot. Gotta pull you up on this especially when you have claimed to have listened to it 20 times and you've still got it wrong. Ferguson was talking about Suarez not Evra. He was talking about Suarez' refusal to shake Evra's hand not Evra's stupid "understandable under the circumstances" celebration afterwards.

They are regulars in my back garden too and have been a regular sight in Dulwich and Peckham for quite a few years now.

If he does. I'm hoping he can do both jobs in tandem.

Suarez is dragging Liverpool's good name down to the level of the gutter. Dalglish isn't helping things either. The chairman and owner of the club should sort this out sharpish. I was at White Hart Lane yesterday. Fantastic performance from Spurs. We destroyed Newcastle and we did it with great aplomb and style. The vocal backing Harry has got from the crowd in the last couple of home games has been absolutely phenomenal. We'd be gutted if he goes.

Catatonia - Lost Cat.

REM - Orange Crushed And Devalued.

Well I go to the occasional England game at Wembley and of course I'd love it if we actually won something. Fat chance of that happening though. I always find watching England frustrating compared to watching Tottenham Hotspur, though that to at times can be frustrating as well. I agree with everything that Quids said earlier. We've been crap since '98. (cue Atila saying Spurs have been crap since '61 blah blah blah). I'm old enough to remember watching the World Cup final in '66 but even the joy of winning was offset by my boyhood idol Jimmy Greaves not playing. I was gutted he wasn't in the side that day though probably not as much as he was.

Agreed. High profile equals high maintenance. Not sure if we could afford him anyway.

red devil Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Jah, I don't it's fair you painting him as being > disloyal if he does accept the job, he's done > wonders at Spurs...who know's, it might be the > perfect job for someone like Mourinho to come in > and take you to the next level. Hmmm.... You're right. I didn't mean to infer he would be disloyal if he left Spurs but that's what I wrote. So guilty as charged. I don't think many Spurs fans would begrudge him the England job if he took it. He's worked wonders at Tottenham since he took over from Ramos and we'd all be very upset at him leaving. Mourinho's style of football (one-nils and close the shop) wouldn't suit the Spurs brand of football. It might win titles though but I'd be unhappy if our style of play changed and was boring to watch.

We'll have to wait and see how loyal Harry is. Does he need the aggro? He's got a good thing going at Spurs. I'm hoping he stays though the timing seems perfect to me for him to take it. Less work for more money. What or who is the alternative if he says no? I'd give it to Stuart Pearce. He's been groomed with the Under 21's (no smutty jokes please), has experience of international competition as a player and a manager. And of course is a lion hearted Englishman through and through. If the cap fits let him wear it.