ianr

I would try asking at the data input end. I guess phoning 0300 303 5667 at https://gov.wales/digital-nhs-covid-pass-available-wales-urgent-travel might be able to help shed some light on the current data propagation processes and how best to deal with the problem.

A reminder that the weekend services are unaffected. Confirmed by the departures boards, at both the station and https://ojp.nationalrail.co.uk/service/ldbboard/dep/EDW, and by https://www.nationalrail.co.uk/service_disruptions/today.asp and https://www.southernrailway.com/coronavirus-information/revised-timetable#timetable.

DVLA do say you can request (and presumably may be given) details of the registered keeper, given "reasonable cause": https://www.gov.uk/request-information-from-dvla.

Here are some more to be getting on with: https://www.google.com/search?q=I+just+signed+the+petition.

> You can read more and sign the petition here: Give me some reasons why you think I should.

> Is there a Dominic Cummings translator > in the house, what's the trolleys for ? "Dominic Cummings has hit out at Boris Johnson?s indecisiveness and described him as ?a shopping trolley smashing from one side of the aisle to the other? as a part of a blistering attack on his apparent inability to lead the country as Prime Minister." https://www.cityam.com/indecisive-boris-johnson-a-shopping-trolley-smashing-between-aisles-says-cummings/ (26 May) Without having found this I'd have surmised DC meant something like "empty vehicle", "available to all", "gets filled up with whatever seems attractive or satisfying". Maybe those are to be found elsewhere in the corpus.

> this is wat we get That's not very surprising. Use a Bookmark, or Favourite, or whatever your system calls them. If your browser's like mine it'll even provide a Bookmark Toolbar to allow single click/touch selection of your choice web pages. (The mouse cursor was hovering over mine in the attached.)

I'm not an admin, but would like to know what's been happening. From whats's been said so far I'm afraid I don't understand. Spider69's post led me to thinking that it was not actually a login anomaly -- a very strange one -- but maybe most likely to be selection of the wrong target offered by Google after entering "East Dulwich forum" in the address bar. That I decided only after doing some tests myself, that at least confirmed that possibility. But the further reports add doubt. So, can someone please describe more specifically what and where were the preceding typing, clicks and presses.

> So if vaccine efficacy is 90% and we had > a death rate of 1700 at the last peak > > If cases go up to the last peak can we > expect about 170 per day at this peak ? Recent figures suggest ~90% effectiveness against hospitalisation for the fully vaccinated. /forum/read.php?32,2215833,2215932#msg-2215932. If you want predicted death rates you should probably take into account a deaths per hospitalisation rate. There are also the chronic effects, that some experience, to take into account. Some of them seem to remit, albeit after months, some may turn out to be permanent damage.

https://www.google.com/search?q=https%3A%2F%2Fhouseholdresponse.com https://householdresponse.com/ ETA And see the "You should confirm or update the details for your household here, ensuring you" at :https://www.southwark.gov.uk/council-and-democracy/voting-and-elections/annual-electoral-canvass-2021 ETA (3/8/20): I entered a unique email address when submitting my household voter confirmation to householdresponse.com last July. Since then it's been used solely by both householdresponse.com and Southwark, for electoral registration business. I've no reason at all to doubt its genuineness.

alex_b Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Take the headlines that 50% of Delta > variant cases in Israel are from > fully vaccinated people. This sounds > bad but is exactly what you?d expect > with 85% of the adult population > vaccinated and a 90% is vaccine > efficiency. I am wondering why no-one has queried this.

Ronnijade wrote: ----------------- > It?s also been scientifically proven > that wearing a mask doesn?t inhibit > your oxygen levels whatsoever, so... > I call BS on a certain post on > this thread. Ahem. What do you make of this paper, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8050876/, which was cited in this thread in the Covid-19 section /forum/read.php?32,2209397?

There are some elements in the OP that are possibly similar to those in the police briefing at /forum/read.php?20,2174488,2216052#msg-2216052, about some incidents in Peckham on Wednesday the 23rd.

Any family resemblance to I'm Backing Britain (commentary https://nostalgiacentral.com/pop-culture/fads/im-backing-britain-1968/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I%27m_Backing_Britain, song (1MB) https://maza999.in/dl.php?source=youtube&dl=MQ==)?

So what is it you want for Jonny's spotty nose? Triage, or allowing his mother to refer him to a consultant dermatologist?

This is from a recent PHE preprint paper "Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against hospital admission with the Delta (B.1.617.2) variant", available at https://khub.net/web/phe-national/public-library/-/document_library/v2WsRK3ZlEig/view_file/479607329 . Effectiveness against hospitalisation Vaccination status Alpha Delta Pfizer Dose 1 83% (62-93) 94% (46-99) Pfizer Dose 2 95% (78-99) 96% (86-99) AstraZeneca Dose 1 76% (61-85) 71% (51-83) AstraZeneca Dose 2 86% (53-96) 92% (75-97)

I take it you're referring to EDRH1114090399's assertion above, at /forum/read.php?5,2180997,2209151#msg-2209151, which s/he posted in several threads. I posted a rejoinder to it, /forum/read.php?5,2180997,2203886#msg-2203886 after its first appearance, as has AylwardS, above.

I've turned the saturation up a bit. Any more attractive?

That sounds like a good reason for getting personally involved if you see any note-leaving; at very least getting the reg. of the other vehicle and leaving your own note too.

> The solution provided by Tevja > at Bromley pest control is humane > and very clever. > He installed a bait hive on > the adjacent pot. The bees > can exit the original pot > but cannot return. How did he manage to make it a one-way mass evacuation??

This post now superfluous. tb23's successfully posted in main section.

Spartacus wrote: > Are you advocating we live in > "the city of domes" till we're 30 > and get to go on "Carrousel" ? > > Oh lordy hope you're not Jessica 6 I don't recognise a single one of those references.

First Mate wrote on May 26, 05:48PM > It seems that unless you opt out > you are giving over rather more > than just anonymised data, your name, > address, DOB. What's your source for your information that name, address and DOB may be passed on? Does your "rather more than" refer to "just anonymised data, your name, address, DOB"? If so, what is the "more"?

Commiserations, ech. If it's the case that your insurer's decision is a generic one it might just be worth checking the Asguard website and online brochure, just to see whether your particular model does have any kind of external accreditation or approval (I guess an LPCB one would be the best) that might serve as useful ammunition. I found it a very vexing website, making it difficult to converge on the limited set of approved models, but it should be easier if you know which type yours is. ETA I also wonder about the "temporary structure" characterisation, given that the Asguards are made to be bolted to the ground. Btw, I see that Asguard do have a page of 'high security' category sheds listed at https://www.asgardsss.co.uk/high-security-sheds; though I'd still want to check the specific page listing of any particular shed, of any or no stated category.

flippit Wrote: -------------- > Note , I also have legal training! Para 6 of the notice: "Further information may be obtained by contacting Network Management at [email protected]".