Angelina

she's relying on that. pity - should be relying on robust content not to worry - it's only everything at stake.

I think the shambles that is happening is enough to make anyone crazy. Apparently TM didn't even vote for her own Agreement. Ludicrous.

Farage will not be walking the full 270 miles, no. He did say he'd walk 100 of them, which is commendable. It would take around 10 full days non stop to walk the full distance. Eddie Izzard is our famous long distance person of note :-)

Brilliant. They all marched past my office today. Awesome.

I completely agree. What people determine to be essential and what is really essential are very different. There are hoards of children outside Parliament begging for climate change - and here we are complaining about how inconvenient it is that we have to take longer in the car to get to where we want to go. This is a clear demonstration of why we are where we are - we EXPECT to be able to drive everywhere - at our convenience. We should be looking at only making ESSENTIAL journeys - and not what is convenient (although we do like to say it's essential). When there are no trains, no buses as we have seen - London still moves.

good choice of words! one of mine is there... good for them. I completely and totally disagree with the comment above that it's too little too late for people to make any dent in the issue themselves. Change your behaviour and you can - literally - change the world. Don't leave it to our children to do. sort yourselves out - cut out plastic bottles, baby wipes, recycle - or re-use......

You have to ask why they would not be picking up on that. It's hidden in the legalities and should be made absolutely clear that the implications are restrictive. It may be that the public are not expected to understand that (or if you are capable, you will do your own research). The TM agreement is dangerous for the UK and would leave us far worse off than we are now. I don't see how anyone would endorse it (unless you're in the EU.....) And if it's a choice between no deal and TM deal then the risks need to be very very clear. Something which is lacking in the mainstream media.

ok, so a 2nd Referendum would not include options for No Deal and would not include options for TM Deal.. So - only would be vote to stay in EU. A one-box vote? That would mean it's based purely on HOW MANY PEOPLE turn out to vote - if it's more than do not. That is absurd.

So if we're allowed a second referendum, but TM's deal is off the table, what will the votes be for? Leave the EU without a Deal Stay in the EU How can it be for anything else? they can't have an option for a new WA, as how would that be achieved? They may as well not bother and just say we're staying, but of course - they can't as it was a democratic vote to Leave...

Even IF TM had collaborated at the onset, there is a chance but no promise that this would have progressed more smoothly - and agreement in our own Parliament achieved. It's debatable. The second challenge would be to get this agreement signed off with the EU - and the scale of our shoddiness in terms of negotiation skills would not have met this challenge (unless it was on the EU terms, whcih is where we are now). There is no point is looking at who is to blame and what could have been done. TM will leave the stage once this is finished - she will wash her hands of it - there will be continuity and no responsibility for it (whatever it is) going forward.

TM has taken it down to the wire and left the ultimate choice to be her deal as it stands (with the legal risks of tying UK into subservience to the will of the EU) or No Deal. An extension does not offer any further choices. So - as it is when we vote - the choice will be Which Do You Want Least? rather than which do you actually WANT

No one is winning

Gardeman, I get it. But....You need to start with something simpler and work up....

the audacity. I had a person in my front garden trying to take my garden table. Even when I went out and asked what they were doing in my garden there was no indication that they were doing anything wrong. in fact they just continued and seemed annoyed I was asking questions. Always shred documents and keep an eye on your credit files - this is where you will first find fraudulent loans etc in your name.

So people don't like the traffic on their roads now it's diverted. CH may be a wider road but it is also a residential area but had turned into a main road I fully welcome the view of stopping traffic through more roads, as Peter atated.

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=report+non+emergency+crime+to+police sorry to hear about your car.

You contact the school and ask them

There is a fantastic move to encourage cyclists in London - see all the cycle routes. This is to the detriment of cars (taking up their precious lanes) - of which there are far too many anyway, so this is a good thing. More bikes = less cars. I think there should be a system for rewarding car drivers who change to cycling commute instead. So, no - no tax on bikes.

You can't discount the ones who didn't vote and use them in your stats against those who did. Those who didn't vote also didn't vote to remain, so like for like, you could say even less people voted Remain than the actual results. Gets a bit cloudy, doesn't it.

Any vote on the details of a leave agreement are still open to negotiation with EU, unless EU is involved at the outset and there is pre-agreement that one of the vote-able options would be enforced. It's therefore in no way a solution - it's just adding options. If it was a majority Remain, well that in itself is a problem, as there are then two contradictory democratic votes - which is farcical.

try this link https://www.google.com/search?q=house+clearance+company+in+SE+London

what exactly does this mean? "offering a solution to a crisis" If there was another vote... Is there a concrete and explicit outcome they want? If there is a vote, what are the options? Remain/ Leave? Well that's not a solution If Remain won, how would that work given we have already held a democratic vote and this would be against the spirit of democracy (best of three, perhaps?) If Leave won, what would happen then that is different form what is happening now? It's all quite a big "IF"

there's a fab place near Herne Hill on Dulwich Road, which might be interested? although they may only pick selected items they could sell on. British Heart Foundation - or Oxfam will collect furniture but you wouldn't get anything for it as they would take it as a donation.

and soon we'll have the expanded Ultra Low Emission Zone, which aims to further reduce pollution. seriously, there are so many cars... do you really believe every journey is critical?

I actually mentioned two - it's not balanced to only pick one to criticise. The SA actually do a lot of good work - they're well known for feeding the homeless and they don't discriminate in doing so. They also employ people from other faiths, so where exactly are you going with running them down?