Anyway, sorry to have taken up broadbandwidth on this one... I think it's an interesting topic. No need to close down the debate because there was disagreement on one aspect of it. How writing is valued is interesting. Within our culture, some writing is highly rewarded and some is not. There is already some money flowing from license fee to writers of the finely-crafted 45 minute afternoon play on Radio 4 - but clearly there is little perceived commercial value in that format at all. As a society, if we valued the telling of stories in that format enough to reward the writer more then that's what would happen. As it is, it is subsidised in the name of cultural enrichment, I guess, with writers getting what they can to indulge their need to process their experiences and stories in that format. (same goes for other formats, too). Should the BBC be cutting out the frivolity to encourage a wider range of writers, and better reward the ones it has? You betcha. And I already made that point. it can take a long time to get back to the writer with instructions on cuts and edits and rewrites. During which time you can do other things, surely. If I were taking a job, I'd quote for the whole of it (including rewrites, time on set etc) and not do it if it were not worth my while. Especially if it is for something like Doctors, which is not likely to be a labour of love - but rather something you'd do for the money. I didn't see the biscuit bit. I agree, that would be a deal breaker.