dbboy

Joe, please don't end your participation in this thread, it's valued.

The child is the result of this teenage jihadi getting pregnant by another Dutch jihadi, and where is the father? So why do you want her child in this country brought up by the grand father who radicalised his own daughter. And the father will not ignore his baby, he'll want to come here from Holland to see her and her baby. Why put this country at further risk? Solution, why doesn't the family go and join her in Syria? Result, Today's child is tomorrow?s terrorist

Finally the UK has stood its ground and said it like it is. The reason this has been brought to the fore is because of the jahadi school girl who now wants too come back here. She is an enemy of the state and as such has no place here, she fore fitted the right to return here when she went to join diaesh and in doing so committed treason. What's more she's shown not an once of remorse or denounced diaesh. She even called her baby Jarrah after a 13th century murderous war lord. How about all those who were beheaded in cold blood by diaesh or those that where murdered in the Manchester, London Bridge and Westminster Bridge attacks? Simply put she has no place in this country or right of return, nor anyone who went out to join diaesh and wants to come back to the UK. "traitor (plural traitors) 1. Someone who violates an allegiance and betrays their country; someone guilty of treason; one who, in breach of trust, delivers their country to an enemy, or yields up any fort or place entrusted to his defence, or surrenders an army or body of troops to the enemy, unless when vanquished quotations 2. Someone who takes arms and levies war against their country; or one who aids an enemy in conquering his country. Hence, one who betrays any confidence or trust." https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/231521

I expect as part of the station development to fully open up the square frontage, it is likely to be demolished.

Which bit of democracy don't you seem to get? democracyDictionary result for democracy /dɪˈmɒkrəsi/Submit noun a system of government by the whole population or all the eligible members of a state, typically through elected representatives. "a system of parliamentary democracy" synonyms: representative government, elective government, constitutional government, popular government; More a state governed under a system of democracy. plural noun: democracies "a multiparty democracy" control of an organization or group by the majority of its members. "the intended extension of industrial democracy" In terms of the EU referendum result, you voted, the country reached a majority decision to leave, the Government are trying to (badly) implement the result. A further referendum will only muddy the waters. You may or may not agree with the outcome of referendum, but that is the result be that right or wrong.

Yet again another Practice Manager has left and has been replaced by an interim practice manager. Clearly their recruitment practices leave something to be desired, any chance they can provide consistency in staffing???????

And if people didn't carry weapons and freely use them.

timetable was recently changed and frequency has improved

P13 frequency has increased and at times is every ten mins. Need to check timetable at bus stop depends when you travel.

See attached letter for details of TW replacement works

I do like a bit of bacon around my sausage.

see https://tfl.gov.uk/bus/status/

As did a 185 yesterday going round the back streets on very tight turns.

P13 today was on up LL and left along Whately and Underhill, but don't know where it went from Underhill/Langton rise junction, it carried on towards Melford road.

Count your blessings this afternoon a 185 on it's apparent way to Lewisham decided to go OFF route from Honor Oak Road, left into Tyson rd, left onto Devonshire road, left onto Boveney road, left into Hengrave road, left onto Honor Oak Road, right and back down Forest Hill Road, left onto Woodvale all the way to the end, finally left back onto London Road/ Lordship lane. The back roads of SE23 are not designed for buses as the driver found out to his cost, having to manoeuvre some very, very tight corners to get around. Doubt he'll be repeating it, and what those living on teh back streets thought when the 185 went doen the roads, I have no idea.

p

?Total gridlock as @thameswater?s tri-annual water feature on London Road rips up the tarmac and forces traffic onto the Horniman Heights." copied from P13, P4 - LORDSHIP LANE, SE22: Routes P4 and P13 are diverted due to emergency waterworks on Lordship Lane. Route P4 is diverted via Lordship Lane, Barry Road, Forest Hill Road and Wood Vale, and is unable to serve the Lordship Lane/Wood Vale stops. Route P13 is diverted via Lordship Lane and Barry Road, and is unable to serve stops between Underhill Road/Melford Road and Friern Road. 363 - LORDSHIP LANE, SE22: Route 363 is diverted due to emergency waterworks on Lordship Lane. Buses are diverted northbound via Honor Oak Road and buses are unable to serve stops between Wood Vale/Forest Hill Road and Lordship Lane/Wood Vale. Buses are diverted southbound via Honor Oak Road, London Road, Dartmouth Road and Kirkdale, and are unable to serve stops between Wood Vale/Forest Hill Road and Horniman Park. 176, 185, 197 - LORDSHIP LANE, SE22: Routes 176 185 and 197 are diverted via Barry Road, Peckham Rye, Forest Hill Road and Honor Oak Road due to emergency waterworks on Lordship Lane, and buses are unable to serve stops between Dulwich Library and Horniman Museum.

From TfL "LORDSHIP LANE, SE22: Buses are diverted in both directions due to emergency waterworks on Lordship Lane. Routes 176 185 and 197 are diverted via Barry Road, Peckham Rye, Forest Hill Road and Honor Oak Road, and buses are unable to serve stops between Dulwich Library and Horniman Museum. Route 363 is diverted via Honor Oak Road and buses are unable to serve stops between Wood Vale/Forest Hill Road and Lordship Lane/Wood Vale. Route P4 is unable to serve the Lordship Lane/Wood Vale stop. Route P13 is unable to serve the Grove Tavern stop."

Edag might have been trying, used in the "loosest" terms for the community, can I suggest you look back to last year and how they he/treated people who dared comment on their inability to meet their own deadlines. He was scathing at the time and now he expects everyone to say what a great job he/they did. Well, others may think so, but personally I think you let a lot of people down. They have now finally announced their chosen winners, and I have to admit it must have been difficult based on the entries they had. Indeed it must have been like shooting fish in a barrel with all that choice. Ron - I am not trying to "tear it down", just exposing the organisers for what they are, getting public funds and not delivering what was supposed to be delivered when it was supposed to be done. Hannah Morris - well done for having taken part and if you haven't felt let down, well that's good Mark - it is not spitefulness by any means. If you are happy with edag and co expecting everyone to go yipee, didn't we do a great job, well that's your choice, I think not. Oh and an exhibition of the works that was supposed to last a week lasted a day, plus edag making it like a fishing trip to find and see all the entries and then saying they were on instagram from the start. Well if you had told people, they could have seen all the entries but he didn't. Try Communication, Communication, Communication or should that be Education, Education, Education!!!!!! Simply put, the results are six months late, no excuse, no apology, no explanation as to why and these are supposed business people running the thing. Gives you little if any faith in their ability, I hope the sponsors look at the lessons learnt if the whole episode is ever repeated.

Well you never made that clear that they were available on Instagram from day 1 did you? More deception and excuses when you get publicly exposed.

Apology, if anyone needs to apologise it's you and your motley bunch who have taken SIX MONTHS PLUS to select YOUR winners. Your sarcasm does you no credit and as for quiet time, that comment was totally unnecessary. You shouldn't have needed to be pushed to have published them all and it shouldn't have taken you so long. Hell will have to freeze over before you get one, you've got a VERY long wait.

yep that's 5, where are the other 406???? You were part funded with public funds, seems like this whole thing is not being run either openly or transparently.

Why have you not framed and numbered each rather than sticking them up with bluetak? Who had enough time didn't you .like six months worth.

Great news, Krystal's is the best pharmacy in SE London, excellently run and stocked. If the pharmacy is anything to go by, then the post office will also be a success. Krystals, keep up the great work you all do.

eastDAG, can't believe you have the gall to post on here after the slatting you got last time, but you have, so here goes......... So it has taken this bunch of self appointed judges made up of a local councillor, a gallery owner, two photographers, a web site editor, an e paper editor, someone from an art club, a VA of an RA and a local retailer six months to select and "judge" 20 winners (5%) from 411 photo's!!! Really what took them so long? (oh,and no excuses, just some honest answers) Don't repeat the fiasco and if you even consider doing it again, I'd suggest a group of professionals who know what they are up to, who can select the best pictures, who most importantly have the time, resources, capability and balls to do the job properly.