Ladymuck

calendar

SCSB79 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Ladymuck Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > But you are right...these bankers are not > > deserving of such large sums of extra money. > > > Yes they are. (Altogether now): OH NO THEY'RE NOT! Are you in the banking sector SCSB79? *massive grin*

brum Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > ...blimey, and I thought I had just imagined > it...! ;-) Nope...I was there...it happened...

(Poubelle: just teasing...you're alright) circumference

(Poubelle: ...erm...nothing...no reason at all for my comment...oh no...like bloody heck! hee hee) (KK: welcome back!) width

(Poubelle you have a one-track mind) big

Huguenot Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > It's a wee bit smoke and mirrors isn't it? Yes a "wee bit"...but I am looking forward to the cascade of whinging/objections from the banking sector...it's already started...poor little poppets http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/banksandfinance/7039105/HSBC-boss-Michael-Geoghegan-attacks-bank-bonus-tax.html *falls about laughing*

brum Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Yes but don't you think it legitimises the > practice somewhat. A green light (if ever they > needed one) for the bankers to continue dishing > out massive bonuses to staff who are well-paid > anyway. Yes you are right, but if the banks themselves are going to take the hit and the Treasury ends up with more in its coffers...then that makes it a little better (for me anyway...but then I'm just a simpleton). As per Mr. Tescos: every little helps. But you are right...these bankers are not deserving of such large sums of extra money.

(I just knew you were going to put that!!! ha ha ha) less

Hilarious or what!!!!? *falls about laughing*

front

bare

stick

engine (appreciate the return to topic Poubelle)

karter Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > 901 ha ha - that'll teach ya!!!

700

pressure

Huguenot Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > You can't really have 9.02 pounds. The '9' is in > imperial, the '.02' is decimal. > > You'd have to be pounds, ounces, drachms and then > grains. For those in 1824, anything of a smaller > fraction than a grain didn't exist. *bursts out laughing and thinks "typical Huguenot"*

brum Wrote: > Merde de chien, LadyM - how very dare you! ::o hee hee xx

brum Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > 2.2 x 4.1 = 9.02 lbs. There you are, fellow > dinosaur... Blimey! Thanks Einstein!

Blimey...didn't realise they weighed babies in kilos nowadays...what's that in lbs and ounces? Anyway, congratulations.

brum Wrote: > They didn't notice me standing there for at least > 5 minutes... > > Ok I made up that last bit. Yeah...whatever...

I went out on the piss!

It's fabulous...well worth the inconvenience of being without earlier...thanks.

I take it you don't have children of your own! I'm the same...and have 13 Godchildren...would have a lot more had I not started saying no some years back. It just got ridiculous...not flattering at all to my mind...so I just say NO...and people don't ask anymore.