mockney piers Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Hmm, I think concrete foundations go into pretty > much every building bigger than a shed, and even > then.... > > Turbines don't have nearly the impact on bird > populations that just about any other human > activity has, if you're that concerned about our > feathered friends ban cats as pets. > In fact the RSPB are pro wind farms and you'll > notice the only examples of negative impact on > bird populations they give aren't in the UK > http://www.rspb.org.uk/ourwork/policy/windfarms/in > dex.asp > > Indeed small turbines attached to your house are > little more than gestures, have you noticed how > big they need to be? > Turbines are very efficient, and yes they may be > intermittent, but what isn't, even coal powered > stations need down time. But get this, it's > totally clean and ... ooh renewable. > > So they're pretty ugly (I actually think they're > rather majestic but hey); world is dying and > bigger sacrifices will have to be made, and made > soon, than having the horizon a bit cluttered. > > "I'm all for renewable energy but sometimes the > options smack of jobs for the boys and lining > pockets." poppy cock, @#$%& sight cheaper than > ploughing it all into a new generation of nuclear > power stations that will not only cost untold > billions but will lump future generations with > enormous clean up bills just as we're having to > pay astronomical costs now for the first > generation of stations. > > Wind farms are no magic solution but they're a > bloody start. They should be off-shore.