Brendan

I went to Bromley once.

I watched an episode of Frasier once.

Bit like the subtle charater development in this You can laugh now Bob.

I vote Yes to Pot.

Enough with the bullshit propaganda please. It is a tried and tested system, the question of the BNP was a red herring raise as part of the lie based No campaign. H was merely putting it to bed. Now would you please bugger off and do whatever the cp pays you to do somewhere else.

For gods? sake man get a job, or a drug habit or something but lay off this Ice Station Seinfeld business it?s not good for you.

But what if your first choice is Mars Bar but if Mars Bar is out of stock you would much rather have Wagon Wheels (or indeed be skinned alive and dragged by a team of horses across a salt pan) than be forced to eat green and blacks?

Dunno. If liar X leaves Birmingham at 6pm travelling at 56mph and liar Y leaves Leeds at 8pm travelling at 120mph which of them gets a bigger second home?

Ted Max Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > (A cable of criminals? I think it has something to do with online crime.

They told me England was a fairytale country filled with tea and scones. Or was it an impoverished, piss drenched, hell hole populated by knife wielding maniacs run by a cabal of chinless criminals? Depends on which film I was watching I suppose.

I dunno. Why Franco the Spanish Civil War?

Depends, why don?t you rate them in order of preference.

It basically says that even though at least 60% of the country are basically left wing i.e. they think that government policy should be ultimately routed in social justice. This 60% are also too fickle and unfocused to have one practical ideological position and their votes are consequently spilt up amongst different parties. On the other hand you have a right wing who, although in the minority and only managing about 36% of the vote even after the most disastrous Labour administration in living memory, are nevertheless a tribe broadly represented by a single party. (There is about 14% of the vote which gets filed under ?other?. These are the racists the commies and the IRA.) In the current system this means that while the right can under favourable circumstances only muster 36% of the vote they can quite easily end up with almost all the power. This is either the fault of an unfair system or the fault of the left for being too useless to present a unified front. Either way under AV the result will be that the left is better represented and therefore the government will be more representative of the population i.e. fickle and unfocused. This is the problem with democracy. People can?t be trusted to know what is good for them. If people had their way we'd probably have a laser cat economy, monthly oral sex holidays and juggling policemen.

There will be 2 boxes on the form, one marked YES the other NO. Put a 1 in the one you prefer and a 2 in your second choice.

Me, I read it ?cause I'm better than you.

People read the Guardian for a number of reasons. Take Quids and Snorky for example. They represent the portion of its readership who click through the pages as a masochistic exercise which fuels misanthropic rants. They?re an under-recognised yet socially important market

Nah, he?s been a cunt since he started reading the Guardian.

My wife says that she is proud of her working class heritage. I say that the class system is a now defunct way of classifying people in an industrial economy that no longer exists and that its only relevance today is in a historical context. My wife says that?s exactly the sort of middle class shit she?d expect from me.

There are many valid arguments supporting the constitutional function of the monarchy. There are a lot fewer for the continued tolerance of a feudal, land owning aristocracy by British society. It is this issue that is often the cause of misdirected vitriol towards the royal family and their function in the constitution. But that all aside, what I don?t understand is why does everyone celebrate some strangers? wedding? It smells suspiciously of Nationalism to me. It even has the requisite military slant to go with the manic flag waving. Just because the focus of the whole business are a young couple doesn?t make the stench of Nationalism less nauseating.

This one is for Snorky:

Capybaras

mockney piers Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > the Duckworth Lewis > method in full flow. Is that where they put the little widget in the can? If so it?s really not cricket at all. Except perhaps in everyones' favourite Irish stout. But that?s only because the leprechauns still farm proper traditional widgets. Those fake widgets from Burton on Trent can fuck right off though.

Oh is this about soccer. I'll shut up then.

Yes it is truly sad how the populations of quaint Scottish villages have to move down to the big smoke to find work on the offices. Their only solace to gather together around television sets and remember the old country with tearful ballads about past glories. Tugs me strings it does.

Is that a Chinaman that turns the wrong way and doesn?t bounce when delivered by a left arm orthodox?