Emerson Crane Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Does that mean you've seen people actively engaged > in such acts, as a result of an absence of signs > prohibiting such behaviour? No, not as such. Only that any prohibition, if indeed there is any, is not explicitly communicated so a reasonable person could be forgiven for assuming it is acceptable. I mean the least they could do is hang a sign behind the bar saying ?Buggery is verboten!? or somesuch so that if there is a bit of a kerfuffle and the landlord does have to employ his stout stick and a bucket of water he can point to it and say, ?you were asked nicely.? Bastards!