CPR Dave

The council are reasonably to quick to deal with stuff reported on here too. I've had a good response to reports of pot holes, fly tipping and abandoned rubbish bins.

Surely the birds in this photo are just seagulls?

If it's this bad it's worth complaining How do I complain? If your provider fails to repair a fault by the date promised, or you are unhappy with how long it is taking, follow their formal complaints procedure. This should be explained on their website or by their customer services team. If your problem is still unresolved after eight weeks, you can complain to an independent Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) scheme. Ask your provider for a ‘deadlock’ letter so that you can refer your dispute to the relevant ADR scheme directly before the eight-week mark. There are two ADR schemes: the Communications and Internet Services Adjudication Scheme (CISAS) and Communications Ombudsman. All providers must belong to one of the schemes. Your provider will tell you which scheme it is a member of, or you can use our ADR checker.

Had similar with a tradesman on here. Lots of good reviews. First job he did was OK and reasonably priced. Next job he sent someone else along who was very mediocre, stole some stuff from me and the job ended up costing nearly twice the original estimate.

Would have been worth 4m if we'd got a Waitrose instead of screw fix. 3000 sq ft of voluminous, lateral living spaces that have been expertly curated is actually quite a lot for round here.

Their menu (on Just Eat, they dint even seem tk have their own website) looks disappointingly similar to every other generic "Chinese" restaurant. Given how long it's taken them to open it seems a shame that the offer looks quite so bland.

That site must be enormous. Not sure student digs and families with 3 year old kids are generally a good mix. I see also that Jewson have moved into the other timber yard next to kwik fit already.

Just put it in the green bin and save £80.

Protected view includes the backdrop too. So if this spoiled the view of St Paul's from a protected view in the North (Primose Hill) etc this would be a problem. This issue came up in the DHFV stadium application which itself has no view of St Paul's but might have impacted other protected views if the the housing tower blocks were too tall.

Hi Rockets, am I reading that right if I conclude that there is now 35% more traffic on East Dulwich Grove E than there was before March 2020? If so that represents a shocking failure on the part of the council. Someone should resign for that. And someone should resign for all the gaslighting telling us that there is less traffic than there was before.

If its the one I've seen (heard!) I think it might be an M4.

Louisa is still here.

I don't think it will make any noticeable difference here at all. 70% of the time they have to take off and land east to west because of the prevailing wind conditions. That means that there would only be 15 Saturdays a year when these extra 7 hours of flights will be anywhere near us.

"Not our responsibility" "we're doing a pretty good job" Shameless

[quote]slithers of green will be built on. Why not celebrate [/quote] From the forum's most ardent climate change proponent.

You can download the unaudited accounts there too. There's about a 2 year delay getting the audits completed.

I'm going to object on the bases that removing street space and streets for living and streets for people is contrary to the councils stated plans to ban cars and enforce active travel. This flies in the face of their green credentials too and it must be stopped. Makes a total mockery of the low traffic neighbourhood schemes nearby.

New bays could add to parking pressure though if they are placed strategically. I suspect many of them will appear in ED in areas where the council want to new CPZs and the residents are resistant.

This CPZ isn't just Dulwich Village though. It comes right into our area. It extends all the way to the east side of Lordship Lane all the way down to Townley Road. It's a huge area and it will impact all of East Dulwich very badly which I have no doubt whatsoever is the main intention. They are going to do whatever it takes to make us beg for a CPZ here and won't stop until we do.

Those c***s that drive their electric bikes on the pavement and through pedestrian crossings / red lights / no entries etc Those are the EV drivers I dislike the most. They are also always the most undeservedly smug. And there should be a special place in hell for the ones who park their electric bikes in the middle of the footpath

So, some apologies are due here to the previous management.

This is another survey that you can't complete at all unless you agree to the council harvesting your data. There is no option to opt of data collection if you want to proceed with the survey. I'm not sure how they square that with GDPR.

It's also pretty disgraceful that you can't complete the survey at all unless you agree to the council harvesting your data. There is no option to opt of data collection if you want to proceed with the survey I'm not sure how they square that with GDPR??

Maybe it's time the council started charging these people rent for each of the carparking spaces taken uo by their dropped curbs at the premium rate their supercars justify. Why should those multimillionaire get to drive over our pavements and park for free while forcing all the peasants to pay for parking on the road?

What an absolute joke this survey is. How can they possibly expect people to swallow the myth that there is parking pressure on roads like Calton Avenue or Gilkes Crescent when literally every single house on those roads has a car park in front of it with space for at least two cars? They must think people are so stupid.