Jump to content

The Uplands to become....(Lounged)


Steph

Recommended Posts

scott Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Undecided, except for the fact it won't remain as

> The Uplands..



Can I ask why? Just interested if it's some legal rebranding reason, or just because you don't like it.


Personally, I think if you name it something cool, then great. If however, it was a choice of Uplands, or Villager, I'd go with Uplands every single time!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Moving with the times and all that....why not The Forum (are English pubs named after popular local things that reflect the history/community?) :)-D


Or ...as others said, name it after the fabulous Wodehouse?


Or ...the Blyton (as long as its child-friendly and serves lashings of ginger ale)...


Very best of luck, whatever it turns out to be. Its nearby so I am sure I will pop along to try it out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The current license of The Uplands does NOT allow it to open to midnight Sun-Thurs and 1am Fri & Sat; permitted hours are until 11.30 pm Sun- Thurs and to 12pm Fri and Sat. Bit surprising you don't know that. As for complaints, who is going to complain on Lordship Lane, which is busy with traffic, people and bars/restaurants? CP Road, however, is a residential street, so noise stands out more and carries much further.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

espresso Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The current license of The Uplands does NOT allow

> it to open to midnight Sun-Thurs and 1am Fri &

> Sat; permitted hours are until 11.30 pm


I thought the license meant they can serve until 11:30pm? Add the 20 minutes drinking up time and 10 minutes to get out that makes midnight. Or am I wrong?


What about "Louisa's" or "The Snorky"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Moes.



That's what this pretentious area needs,


a swill hole where you can fall asleep on the upholstered pew and no one moves you on.


Squares of newspaper hanging on a loop of hairy string in the loo....er apologies, bog.


A big smelly old dog curled up dozing under the seat.


A hooped barrell with a wooden tap, perched behind the bar full of Marstons pedigree,


and when it's poured into the pint glass resembling the colour of healthy looking urine.


They don't make 'em like that anymore, the pub culture is a receding industry,


yet it is what many euro-visitors dropped in for as they have nothing like it and sooner or later nor will we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

scott Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So, somebody else suggested it, on this very

> forum. How about The Uplands becomes The Actress ?

> For those who missed the earlier posts, there

> would then be The Bishop & The Actress....


I'm not at all keen on 'The Actress'.


It sounds quite pretentious and a bit, well, crap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The most recent one did, despite the council making it very difficult for anyone to object (which interestingly they were forced to change for the CPZ consultation and look how that went for them). I will dig out the responses for you when I have more time so you can enlighten yourself.   Ha ha...the language used by councils when they see the results of a consultation and need an out to ignore the views of locals...;-) Did you not notice how this only became a thing once the consultation had been run....one wonders why!? Earl you can bluster all you like but you cannot ignore the fact the council closed the junction to emergency services and put lives at risk and resisted all calls (from the emergency services) to open it for them. Surely you can't defend that  or are you willingly turning a blind eye to that too? Ha ha, which kind of begs the question then why so many of you get so vexed by One Dulwich? Surely you could compartmentalise their work if the above was true? I suspect it has a lot to do with the accountability that they are forcing and the fact some don't like it.
    • I believe around 57% of the 5,538 people who were part of the self selecting sample making up the original consultation, opposed the LTN. So just over 3,000 people. This was around 3 years ago now. I think there’s something like 40,000+ living across se22 and SE21 🤷‍♂️  The LTN is a minority interest at best. Whilst it’s an obsession for a small number on the transport thread who strongly oppose it, I suspect most locals quietly approve of the improvements made to that junction. …and we still haven’t heard who has supposedly been pressurising the emergency services and how (are we seriously going with the far left / the commies)? Is anyone willing to stand up and support the 'One' claim that people are partially covering their plates and driving through the filters due to inadequate signage? Again, it all sounds a little ridiculous / desperate. Feels like it may be time for them to start coming to terms with the changes.
    • Okay Earl, of those 'consulted' how many voices were in favour of the junction and how many against? Were there more responses in favour or more against? This local junction change is being driven by Southwark Labour Councillors- not as you assert by Central Govt. Also, if consultations are so irrelevant as indicators of meaningful local support in the way you seem to imply, why do organisations like Southwark Cyclists constantly ask their members to respond to all and any consultation on LTN's and CPZ's?  
    • You could apply the same argument to any kind of penalty as an effective deterrent.  Better than doing nothing. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...