Jump to content

Recommended Posts

As a customer of the Woolwich for the past 20 years, I was sent a letter yesterday explaining that the final phase of the Barclays/Woolwich merger were taking place over the next few months and my local branch would be closing. Does anyone have any ideas what will be replacing the bank on LL? It is quite a big unit and has the potential to be anything from a restaurant to clothing outlet.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1011-the-woolwich-bank-closing/
Share on other sites

Fear 'n boozin Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> a strip joint.



oof


The bellend resedent action group ( BRAG or whatever ) kicked off big time about a lap dancing bar on peckham High st and the application got withdrawn - I cant imagine the reaction if someone has the gall to go for this on LL.

snorky Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "Hopefully a designer baby clothes store"

>

> The chattering classes have embraced Jonny Bodens

> fantastic mail order service - paying out large

> sums of money for Baby clothes is considered a bit

> "chav", a bit bling



Ok, in that case another gastro-pub.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Beckenham is posh, and even they have lidl on the

> high street!


Only small parts of it Louisa, when was the last time you went up the High Street? They still have a few pubs like the old Plough and Forresters yobs getting lairy, fist fights at closing time etc etc.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...