Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I like that rope walk.


1. It will teach kids a bit of risk assessment, school of hard knocks, value of a good thrashing etc etc


2. It might engage the "sit on the bench with a coffee and let other carers/parents rescue my kids" to get off their arse and play with their kids/clients.


This post was brought to you by "is this your child with the bleeding nose?" holier-than-thou Ted Max poster.

  • 6 months later...
They are putting down the new soft matting stuff underneath I think. Spoke the one of the builders, but he was only there to flatten and level the area. Another company are coming in after to lay the matting......hope they hurry up, we go most days and my little lass is missing the swings!

The tunnels are a very dangerous installation indeed... anyone who's seen them will know that literally* dozens of slavering paedophiles, hairy-fisted bullies and indeed good old-fashioned monsters taking a holiday from under kids' beds could be lurking there.


*OK, not literally.


Also, have I spelt slavering correctly?

Personally I don't think drug takers will be (a) able (b) arsed to find the tunnels, crawl inside them, then shoot up. But then neither do I think there are 'dubious people' lying in wait for my children in the tunnels .....


Playgrounds in East Dulwich tend to be full of kids. And parents. And quite nice ones at that. Or am I being terribly blind / naive?

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I can think of no better place to shoot up with my

> mates than 3 ft long 3 ft high red tunnel in Goose

> Green park....

............................................................


Well someone coid have mentioned they were miniture.L.O.L.

But have they got a toilet, some miserable old bint was moaning about a tot piddling on the grass last year.

Thats a good point L.D.

I assumed it was in the planning stage,and no one mentioned it was three foot tot tunnel.already built.

I was remembering a young girl that got dragged into a tunnel in a playground up north and murdred.

I presumed to much. just pass me the Carpol, and I,ll go away.::o

  • 3 weeks later...

Peckhamgatecrasher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm slightly concerned that any self-respecting

> child will try and shimmy up the tall wooden

> structure to get into the tree. Is that just me?



Ah, don't worry, no doubt Southwark Council will be sending someone in to massacre that poor tree soon too..... :'(

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...