Jump to content

The official 2010 World Cup thread

????

By ????
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

matthew123

matthew123

Posted
Posted
It used to be the case a WC was a maximum of 22 players and I believe it was extended to 23 to ensure teams took 3 goalkeepers as if memory serves me correct there were occasions when only 2 goalkeepers were taken on 22 squad basis. Perhaps as part of the squad increase FIFA made it a rule of at least 3 goalkeepers.
ratty

ratty

Posted
Posted

BA are on strike aren't they?


Pity they could not have tossed Terry, Ferdinand, Gerrard, A Cole, Lampard, and Defoe out over the sea tbh. Odious fooks.


Not sure how I can support England when they have so many players I despise as people. Anyone else having this dilemma?

SeanMacGabhann

SeanMacGabhann

Posted
Posted
Absolutely ratty. I literally cannot look at England's Brave John Terry without wanting to hit something. All of teh Chelsea mob to be fair (apart from Joe Cole maybe) Nothing to do with them being English or Chelsea - just odious people. BUt if I forget about them and focus on the likes of David James I feel all better
Narnia

Narnia

Posted
Posted

ruffers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> All you need to know about the three 'keepers here

> ->

> http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2010/may/26/wor

> ld-cup-2010-three-goalkeepers


I read North Korea have tried to pull a fast one by naming a centre forward as their 3rd goalie. FIFA has responded to this by saying that goalkeepers can only play in goals!

DJKillaQueen

DJKillaQueen

Posted
Posted

I read North Korea have tried to pull a fast one by naming a centre forward as their 3rd goalie. FIFA has responded to this by saying that goalkeepers can only play in goals!


Call the UN - get sanctions against N.Korea.....oh hang on ...wrong thread >:D<

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • beansprout
      Dog Kennel Hill School to change name

      By beansprout · Posted

      Now I have heard everything…..not send your kid to a school because you don’t like the name - so to get my head around this, if school is outstanding, parents won’t send their child there because of name of school? Or have I not understood?
    • alice
      Dog Kennel Hill School to change name

      By alice · Posted

      A quick Google says that it is not undersubscribed unlike many subject schools so those claims mentioned above may not be true. Last Ofsted was good.  You are definitely right about the money. This is what trusts do. Remove word ‘subject’ above Remove word ‘subject’ above I can’t edit my ridiculous errors but would like to apologise  for messy post
    • Vik
      Dog Kennel Hill School to change name

      By Vik · Posted

      I have heard claims that people don't send their children there because of the name of the school..?  I genuinely cannot get my head around this one. The school is named after the road it is on which is named after the history of the area!  'Grove Primary School' is potentially the most boring name they could have come up with, and for a school struggling financially, is rebranding the school really the best use of funds? 
    • Forest Hill Climber
      Dog Kennel Hill School to change name

      By Forest Hill Climber · Posted

      Certainly unique, can't argue with that.

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...