Jump to content

Recommended Posts

has anybody else noticed that there are squatters in one of the large houses on east dulwich road.


they dont seem too bad, i spoke to a polite young man yesterday night whilst walking the dog, he said they intend to live

there not to cause any disruption or have any partys.


lets see what becomes of this. hopefully they are peacefull and stick to their word

Agreed Milo!


I don't agree with taking over a family home, preventing people living in their own homes, but leaving properties unoccupied whilst there're so many homeless and greedy landlords offering hovels at almost extortionate rents, then fair play to the squatters.

so fair play to those knowledgable and fit enough to squat in an unoccupied house?...forget those in need who don't have those organisational skills. The last squatters i knew lived in a house owned by a housing association who rehoused those with mental health difficulties ..the squatter I spoke to smiled politely when i pointed out the paradox of the situation.

alice Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> > The last squatters i knew lived in a house owned

> by a housing association who rehoused those with

> mental health difficulties ..the squatter I spoke

> to smiled politely when i pointed out the paradox

> of the situation.


xxxxxxxxx


So how were they able to squat the house, unless the housing association weren't making full use of it?


Is there some length of time a house has to remain empty before it can be legally squatted? My house has sometimes been empty for a few months in the past, and the prospect of squatters never occurred to me :-$


Maybe they would reject it as far too small :))

Has there been any damage caused to the house by the squatters? And who does the property actually belong to?


I think it's murky water to tar all squatters with the same brush, in either case. It is unfair to base opinions on the actions of others you may have come into contact with in the past. Yet, it can also be dangerous (in a non dramatic sense!) to not be wary of a group of people taking over an owned property.


However. In a post such as this, and as residents of the area, then maybe we should steer away from the rights and wrongs and apparent lifestyles of sqatters and focus on what we all have an interest in. Our community.


Preach over! Do excuse me for this! I have worked with a number of squatters on projects in the past and have been amazed to discover how varied their stories and situations are. Class has little to do with it very often! The vast majority of people I worked with had easily enough money to rent a stable home (probably more than me, since I work in a museum!) with heating and water, but often squatting was seen as a statement and a chosen lifestyle. Even a political reaction!


So....back to the point. Is the house being damasged that they are occupying?!!


Abi

My understanding of the situation (which I do not pretend is authorative or current) is that squatters are not allowed to break into a property to occupy it. Equally, they are not allowed to occupy the propertry if that prevents the owner from using it for its proper purpose. e.g. someone cant squat in your house if it prevents you living in it.


Am I near the mark anyone?

Milo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> TheAllSeeingEye Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Is it their house ?? No. I sense someone above

> is

> > almost approving of the squatting process.

>

>

> I approve of it, houses left unlived in for a long

> period should definitely be squatted.



Isnt it trespass and therefore illegal ?? yes, it is.

If you own/rent a home, and it is your actual home, and you come back from holiday to find it squatted, you can call the police and ask them to remove the people who are occupying it. Squatters know this and don't bother with people's homes.

If squatters occupy a council/housing association property, which is not currently someone's home, then the owner has to ask them to leave, serve a notice on them warning them that the owner will be asking a court to grant them possession of the property, then go to court. The court is very likely to agree with the landlord, except in very very unusual cases such as when the squatters have been there for years. Then the court and landlord arrange for bailiffs to go round and remove the squatters - they may call the police if they think there will be trouble, but bailiffs I have seen in action usually get people out with a loud voice and physical presence. A number of years ago, the law was changed to allow social landlords to "pre-allocate" a flat/ house to a new tenant before it was actually ready for occuoation. This means that if the place is squatted while repairs are going on, the squatters can be removed very quickly as it counts as someone's home. Most squatters know this so don't bother to occupy places that look like they will soon have a tenant/owner. I don't know what the situation is with places left empty by private landlords.

I have no problem with squatting, on two basic conditions - that squatters cause no trouble to the property or neighbours, and that they aren't keeping out someone who wishes to live in the house legally. I don't believe that the number of people squatting is making a vast and negative difference to the list of people awaiting housing, nor do I think, if left unoccupied, these squatted houses would find their way to people in genuine need. They would simply exist in a state of increasing decrepitude until it was financially expedient for the landlord to either sell or fill it - if the landlord isn't interested enough in their property even to occupy it in one or another way, why shouldn't someone else make use of it in the meantime?


If squatters treat the place they occupy with care, then until someone else wants to legally live in that home (at which point, out you go), more power to them.

I think squatters should be made to pay their way, foot the bills for their activities or if they really are broke put them out to work on behalf of the country. Maybe they could even do a full half day of work with members of the Royal family. Free loaders the lot of them - no more excuses.

matthew123 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think squatters should be made to pay their way,

> foot the bills for their activities or if they

> really are broke put them out to work on behalf of

> the country. Maybe they could even do a full half

> day of work with members of the Royal family. Free

> loaders the lot of them - no more excuses.




Goodness me. So black and white.....

Years ago, I squatted a disused railway station, near Stroud, along with several other people. The grounds gave us parking space for our caravans and trucks. Everyone was working away at something, low-paid but enough to live on without having to supplement by claiming benefits.


So while it may seem people are free-loading, it may be the case that they are less of a drain on the system than someone claiming housing benefit, for example. After all, the property is empty, I'm assuming it's been so for some time - long enough for the squatters to have noticed the lack of activity anyway - providing no damage is done and the people involved aren't anti-social, I just can't see it as a terrible thing.


The squatting laws changed back in the late 80's/early 90's, I think, so it is much easier for the owner of the property to serve an eviction notice, after which they've got 4 weeks before they're out. I'm going from memory so happy to be corrected on this.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The SE22 Evri delivery family are lovely, and always say hello wherever we spot them in the area. We gave them a box of chocolates during Covid as they were working their socks off at Christmas
    • What was he doing on the stage at Glastonbury? Or on the stage at the other concert in Finsbury Park? Grinning like a Cheshire cat whilst pissed and stoned 20 somethings on the promise of free internet sung-- Oh Jeremy Corbyn---  What were his policies for Northern mining towns with no jobs or infrastructure? Free Internet and university places for youngsters. What were his other manifesto pledges? Why all the ambiguity over Brexit?  I didn't like Thatcher, Blair or May or Tony but I respected them as politicians because they stood by what they believed in. I respect all politicians across the board that stick to their principles. Corbyn didn't and its why he got  annihilated at the polls. A socialist, anti imperialist and anti capitalist that said he voted for an imperialist and pro capitalist cabal. He refused to say how he'd vote over and over again until the last knockings. He did so to appease the Islington elite and middle class students he was courting. The same people that were screaming that Brexit was racist. At the same time the EU were holding black and Asian immigrants in refugee camps overseas but not a word on that! Corbyn created and courted a student union protest movement that screamed at and shouted down anyone not on the left . They claimed Starmer and the centre right of labour were tories. He didn't get elected  because he, his movement and policies were unelectable, twice. He turned out not to have the convictions of his politics and died on his own sword.    Reform won't win an election. All the idiots that voted for them to keep out Labour actually enabled Labour. They'll be back voting tory next time.    Farage wouldn't be able to make his millions if he was in power. He's a very devious shyster but I very much doubt he'd actually want the responsibility that governance requires.
    • The purge of hard left members that were part of Corbyn's, Mcdonnel's and Lansmans momentum that purged the party of right wing and centrist members. That's politics. It's what Blair did to win, its what Starmer had to do to win. This country doesn't vote in extreme left or right governments. That's partly why Corbyn lost  We're pretty much a centrist bunch.  It doesn't make it false either. It's an opinion based on the voting patterns, demography and statistics. Can you explain then why former mining constituencies that despise the tories voted for them or abstained rather than vote for Corbyns Labour?  What is the truth then? But he never got elected!!! Why? He should have been binned off there and then. Why he was allowed to hang about is an outrage. I hold him party responsible for the shit show that we've had to endure since. 
    • Depends on what the Barista says doesnt it? There was no physical confrontation with the driver, OP thinks she is being targetted when she isnt. These guys work min wage under strict schedules so give them a break unless they damage your stuff
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...