Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Basically as the story goes, the admin got drunk on power, gathered an inner circle of toadies, they starting pm'ing every mister meaner on site, then the libs got in on the act by demanding a private thread and a ban on all people who make negative comments about ED, then people got bored, moved on, as the spirit of the original forum has long since gone.


I have a kettle for sale though?

You're all chumps.


I was posting on this 'ere forum when admin was posting to himself to make it look popular.... (Click on my name and go to first post, woooo yeah! back THEN!!!! ;-) 2006!)


Within a month of launch some pillocks were complaining that it isn't what it was.


I can tell you, with considerable authority, that it's exactly the same as what is was. A cornucopia of pookies.


I only post on here myself because I like being abused. The cleverer the better. Only the vainglorious attract my down-nose-looking.


Come on now. Brush yourselves down. Raise your chin.... there. That's better. Now, go and poo in his briefcase.... :)

The Golden Huguenot.....


http://accentworldwidemerchandise.com/products/images/categories/RedStoneGoldSitBuddha.jpg



For he has spoken....


( & I agree )



All bow...... and say the EDFing "Prayer"



( repeat after me )


THE PRAYER



"I only post on here myself because I like being abused.


Brush yourselves down.


The cleverer the better.


Brush yourselves down.


Only the vainglorious attract my down-nose-looking.


Brush yourselves down.


Come on now.


Brush yourselves down.


Raise your chin.... there.


Brush yourselves down.


That's better.


Brush yourselves down.


Now, go and poo in his briefcase....


Brush yourselves down.


Brush yourselves down. "




Namste....."OOOommmmmm"



* chimes bell , checks i- phone *






W**F

It's not the television.


If it's boring you, you're at liberty to pull your finger out of your ass and make it more entertaining. Or fuggedabahdit and do something else. Complaining about it being boring is not going to make it more interesting. Complaining about it being boring on another forum which is 'proper boring' is surely a sign of mental imbalance - and possibly a sign of having an underdeveloped penis.

Here is the reply to me on NHF by the new female assistant? admin.


I wonder why I am just one of the EDF who still show interest there.


Looks like she cant take criticisum


Her post.


Only you can tell us why you're attracted to maintaining your membership of the Nunhead Forum, Shorty.

It's a voluntary position though. But I hope you won't be asking for your P45 just yet.


I read it as the reverse, but then would I argue?


Walks off with P45 in bag on Zimmer.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Being an inane solipsistic narcissisticist, I

> blame it IT ON ME.



Haha Quids, reckon we all are. Otherwise why the fuck would we think complete strangers would have any interest in anything we had to say? (you know who you are people - I know what I am, but what are you?)


Still, Vrouw, wasn't there a thread in the What's On section a wee while back about swinging action in ED? This has to be an optimistic thought, no? We like each other enough to want to have pop-socked sex on the synthetic settee while the kids are at mums'.

Actually, I do think one of the reasons is the Drawing Room an opinion I've long held. Dumbed down the Lounge (or certainly 'undiluted' the dumbness) and made it less interesting and I'm guessing fewer visitors and a smaller and smaller pool of posters, which both reinforces the feeling of cliques, doesn't encourage newbies and makes us all bored of each other's work, I know I'm bored of my stuff. If you move away from the really useful bits of the forum, then in 'personality' the Lounge is the lifeblood of a forum and I think it's now the poorest bit on here. The Drawing Room has sort of worked in one way but really spoilt the Lounge IMO.


About this Forum rocks

computedshorty Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> I read it as the reverse, but then would I argue?


So you read it as, "Yet just P45 your for asking be won't you hope I but. Though position voluntary a it's. Shorty, Forum Nunhead the of membership your maintaining to attracted you're why us tell can you only."

According to orioles...(mmm, now who is that?) on NHF Daize this is yer answwer


Answer: Its the bland leading the bland, I'm afraid.


No life, electricity or vitality. Nothing to stimulate just becoming a dull, dismal, (slightly) depressing, dreary Lounge area now

as those who were prepared to take a risk or the feisty element ( bbw/mikecg/tls/afn etc) have all been sent packing.

The truth is that any Forum I've ever seen, inevitably, relies on opinionated Men to raise the temperature and cause a stir ( and Yes! friction sometimes) but Men, invariably, have no hard feelings and often praise their adversaries.


I'm afraid the combination of non-controversial and non-combatitive Females and liberal wishy-washy, uncontroversial Men has reduced EDF to its current boring nothingness.


Think there are some truths in that

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, AFAICS, the "civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300" were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...