Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Last night's one.. was Oliver the aforementioned grandpa? He seemed like a sweet old gent! I quite liked all of yesterday's diners, except the joyless arty young fella who did that annoying "apologetic" face every time he moaned about what everyone else was doing. Couldn't spot any local landmarks - except maybe St Giles' churchyard in Camberwell?

genwilliams Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> We thought we saw the Picture Gallery!

>

> The place with the display cabinets; I thought

> that was part of a gallery along Camberwell Road

> as I have been somewhere similar. (Another reason

> why it seemed likely they also used St Giles when

> they filmed John.)


Wasn't it the Hornimans?

They all got along rather too well even with the inclusion of so called eccentric bloke. That meant the commentary was dull. Anyway, it was CDWM South East London, not Dulwich. Don't think it was terribly representative of South East London. Could have done a lot better. I think the ones from outside London are much more amusing.
They used to do one meal per day on the show, so we had half hour to focus on the host and it would go more into details such as where they shopped for their food, a tour of their house and so on but now they have compressed them all into a one hour show they have cut so many bits out, I don't like the new format, I prefer it spread over the course of the week.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • So irrespective of the scandal how do you think that Rayner did as Housing Secretary?  
    • The Labour astro-turfers are out in force on this thread aren't they!
    • I don't really care about political sleaze in this  i am more concerned about thjle ability to run.a country without running it into the ground. Currently, labout seem to be heading straight towards the rocks, ignoring the warning blasts from the economic ighthouse. 
    • Which is exactly why Rayner had to go - don't be the sleaze attack dog and then not keep your own house in order - the really shocking fact is she didn't go the moment this came to light because she knew what advice, and the advice to seek proper tax expertise that was given to her in writing by the very people she was trying to throw under the bus - she clearly thought she might be able to spin her way out of it. When you look at the facts, the advice she was given and when and her behaviour in the last few days it has been scandalous and just shows the contempt for the public intelligence some politicians have. Interesting to see a very unscientific vox pop on BBC News last night but a lot of her own constituents seem to want rid of her as well and to be honest if you have to lose your cabinet role for this breach of the rules then you should probably lose your seat too. That is the hypocrisy here and why a lot of people don't like politicians because they're all the same.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...