Jump to content

Recommended Posts

You are welcome Katie1997. I've been cycling for a LONG time. However, when I first started I was in my late 30s (I had never been taught as a child). I taught myself but could only cycle with confidence with the saddle positioned so that my feet were flat on the ground when stationary. This is far too low - I didn't realise this till many years later (when excruciating pain in my knees forced me to the physios). I raised the seat - and within a few weeks the pain was completely gone. No pain now.

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Just found this.

>

> Katie1997, when you are stationary, how much of

> your foot touches the ground?


Ooer ... I am not getting any of the numbness thankfully ;)


I cannot remember how much of my foot touches the ground - I spend my time at the traffic lights trying to sort my hair out (joking). Will test it out tomorrow!

Just posting something on legality of riding on pavements (to stop another thread being bogged down). Ignore it if you are not interested.


Riding on pavements


The pertinent bit, re children, reads:


"The DfT view, from discussions with Home Office, is that the law applies to all but the police can show discretion to younger children cycling on the pavement for whom cycling on the road would not be a safe option."


The age of criminal responsibility is 10 so, technically, only children below this age can cycle on pavements without fear of redress.


While adults are not allowed to cycle on 'footways' (see definition above), children up to the age of 16 cannot be prosecuted for doing so, see text above for clarification.

bbug Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Just posting something on legality of riding on

> pavements (to stop another thread being bogged

> down). Ignore it if you are not interested.


bbug,


When I started this thread, it was precisely for this kind of thing as opposed to another "cyclists v drivers" exchange of insults thread (though the latter, in moderation, can result in some good entertainment:))).


What you have posted is useful and informative and I'm sure there are many who will be interested (not to mention appreciative).


Last time I heard, the fine for riding on the pavement was ?30.

I have a question - does anyone know of a cycle maintenance course locally? Or anyone who is good at cycle maintenance who could share a few tips in exchange for a drink or two? I'm conscious that if I'm commuting, I should be more aware of what might go wrong and what's easily fixable.

Applespider Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I have a question - does anyone know of a cycle

> maintenance course locally? Or anyone who is good

> at cycle maintenance who could share a few tips in

> exchange for a drink or two? I'm conscious that

> if I'm commuting, I should be more aware of what

> might go wrong and what's easily fixable.


Cycling Training do maintenance courses. They can come to your house. Alternatively you could PM mlteenie...he charges very reasonable rates for bike maintenance/repairs/instruction. When he did my bike MOT, he was keen to show me some basic maintenance stuff. He is very professional and reliable as well as good value and very pleasant. He gets very good feedback on this forum - indeed this is how I found him. Failing that, you could ring the London Cycling Campaign and ask them. They are very helpful. Better still, become a member (you get free third party insurance in the event of an accident).

Actually, this one is just for you Hatchet Boy:


A tandem rider is stopped by a police car.


"What've I done, officer?" asks the rider.


"Perhaps you didn't notice sir, but your wife fell off your bike half a mile back..."


"Oh, thank God for that," says the rider - "I thought I'd gone deaf!"

A pedestrian stepped off the curb and into the road without looking one day and promptly gets knocked flat by a passing cyclist.


"You were really lucky there," said the cyclist.


"What on earth are you talking about! That really hurt!" said the pedestrian, still on the pavement, rubbing his head.


"Well, usually I drive a bus!" the cyclist replied.

Long shot here but is anyone on this thread riding in this year's Etape du Tour?


My other half is doing the public tour de france stage this Sunday so would be interesting to know if anyone local is doing likewise


Also, without trawling back through the previous pages (although I'm sure they're very interesting :-) ) are there any serious cyclists who'd be willing to take my nutty cyclist b/f under their wing and out on weekend rides? He did the etape last year but pretty much gave up cycling for 6 months following and lost a lot of fitness, so is keen to avoid the same thing happening again!


Thanks


Tara

'bout now Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The truth

>

> http://www.newsbiscuit.com/2010/07/11/police-to-ta

> ckle-bike-crime-with-new-indifferent-squad-320/


Nice story 'bout now, though I wasn't quite sure whether it was a joke - it sounded as though it could be. Interesting because further research brings up this from the Guardian's own Bike Blog. Don't think they are the same schemes. Strange...but good.

  • 2 weeks later...

citizenED Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The London Hire Cycle scheme got up and running

> today. I was in town and there seemed to be a lot

> of interest.



Great. More people wobblng randomly through the traffic. Just what we need.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Would wholeheartedly recommend Aria. Quality work, very responsive, lovely guy as well. 
    • A positive update from Southwark Council - “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.“  
    • A solicitor is acting as the executor for our late Aunt's will.  He only communicates by letter which is greatly lengthening the process.  The vast majority of legal people deal by modern means - the Electronic Communications Act that allows for much, if not all of these means is now 25 years old.   Any views and advice out there? In fuller detail: The value of the estate is not high.  There are a number of beneficiaries including one in the US.  It has taken almost three years and there is no end in sight.  The estate (house) is now damp, mouldy and wall paper falling off the wall. The solicitor is hostile, has threatened beneficiaries the police (which would just waste the police's time), and will not engage constructively. He only communicates by letter.  These are poorly written, curt or even hostile, in a language from the middle of last century, he clearly is typing these himself probably on a type writer.  Of course with every letter he makes more money. We've taken the first steps to complain either through the ombudsman and/or the SRA.  We have taken legal advice a couple of times, which of course isn't cheap, and were told that his behaviour is shocking and we'd be in our right to have him removed through the courts. But.... we just want him to get on with executing the will, primarily selling the house. However he refuses to use any other form of communication but letter.  So writing to the beneficiary in the 'States can take a month to get a reply. And even in this country a week or more. Having worked with lawyers in the past I am aware that email, tele and video conferencing and even text and WhatApp are appropriate means for communication.  There could be an immediate response to his questions.   Help!        
    • Labour should be applauded for bringing in the Renter's Rights Act.  But so many of you are carried away with slagging them off. Married couples with busy lives sometimes forget who did what. On this occasion Mr Rachel Reeves was sorting out the rental agreement.  Ms Reeves was a bit flumoxed with all the grief/demonsing/witch hunts she is getting so forgot to check with her other half.   Not the first or last time this will happen with couples. (That's not having a go at the post above)
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...