Jump to content

Recommended Posts

You are welcome Katie1997. I've been cycling for a LONG time. However, when I first started I was in my late 30s (I had never been taught as a child). I taught myself but could only cycle with confidence with the saddle positioned so that my feet were flat on the ground when stationary. This is far too low - I didn't realise this till many years later (when excruciating pain in my knees forced me to the physios). I raised the seat - and within a few weeks the pain was completely gone. No pain now.

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Just found this.

>

> Katie1997, when you are stationary, how much of

> your foot touches the ground?


Ooer ... I am not getting any of the numbness thankfully ;)


I cannot remember how much of my foot touches the ground - I spend my time at the traffic lights trying to sort my hair out (joking). Will test it out tomorrow!

Just posting something on legality of riding on pavements (to stop another thread being bogged down). Ignore it if you are not interested.


Riding on pavements


The pertinent bit, re children, reads:


"The DfT view, from discussions with Home Office, is that the law applies to all but the police can show discretion to younger children cycling on the pavement for whom cycling on the road would not be a safe option."


The age of criminal responsibility is 10 so, technically, only children below this age can cycle on pavements without fear of redress.


While adults are not allowed to cycle on 'footways' (see definition above), children up to the age of 16 cannot be prosecuted for doing so, see text above for clarification.

bbug Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Just posting something on legality of riding on

> pavements (to stop another thread being bogged

> down). Ignore it if you are not interested.


bbug,


When I started this thread, it was precisely for this kind of thing as opposed to another "cyclists v drivers" exchange of insults thread (though the latter, in moderation, can result in some good entertainment:))).


What you have posted is useful and informative and I'm sure there are many who will be interested (not to mention appreciative).


Last time I heard, the fine for riding on the pavement was ?30.

I have a question - does anyone know of a cycle maintenance course locally? Or anyone who is good at cycle maintenance who could share a few tips in exchange for a drink or two? I'm conscious that if I'm commuting, I should be more aware of what might go wrong and what's easily fixable.

Applespider Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I have a question - does anyone know of a cycle

> maintenance course locally? Or anyone who is good

> at cycle maintenance who could share a few tips in

> exchange for a drink or two? I'm conscious that

> if I'm commuting, I should be more aware of what

> might go wrong and what's easily fixable.


Cycling Training do maintenance courses. They can come to your house. Alternatively you could PM mlteenie...he charges very reasonable rates for bike maintenance/repairs/instruction. When he did my bike MOT, he was keen to show me some basic maintenance stuff. He is very professional and reliable as well as good value and very pleasant. He gets very good feedback on this forum - indeed this is how I found him. Failing that, you could ring the London Cycling Campaign and ask them. They are very helpful. Better still, become a member (you get free third party insurance in the event of an accident).

Actually, this one is just for you Hatchet Boy:


A tandem rider is stopped by a police car.


"What've I done, officer?" asks the rider.


"Perhaps you didn't notice sir, but your wife fell off your bike half a mile back..."


"Oh, thank God for that," says the rider - "I thought I'd gone deaf!"

A pedestrian stepped off the curb and into the road without looking one day and promptly gets knocked flat by a passing cyclist.


"You were really lucky there," said the cyclist.


"What on earth are you talking about! That really hurt!" said the pedestrian, still on the pavement, rubbing his head.


"Well, usually I drive a bus!" the cyclist replied.

Long shot here but is anyone on this thread riding in this year's Etape du Tour?


My other half is doing the public tour de france stage this Sunday so would be interesting to know if anyone local is doing likewise


Also, without trawling back through the previous pages (although I'm sure they're very interesting :-) ) are there any serious cyclists who'd be willing to take my nutty cyclist b/f under their wing and out on weekend rides? He did the etape last year but pretty much gave up cycling for 6 months following and lost a lot of fitness, so is keen to avoid the same thing happening again!


Thanks


Tara

'bout now Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The truth

>

> http://www.newsbiscuit.com/2010/07/11/police-to-ta

> ckle-bike-crime-with-new-indifferent-squad-320/


Nice story 'bout now, though I wasn't quite sure whether it was a joke - it sounded as though it could be. Interesting because further research brings up this from the Guardian's own Bike Blog. Don't think they are the same schemes. Strange...but good.

  • 2 weeks later...

citizenED Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The London Hire Cycle scheme got up and running

> today. I was in town and there seemed to be a lot

> of interest.



Great. More people wobblng randomly through the traffic. Just what we need.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, AFAICS, the "civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300" were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...