Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Michael Palaeologus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Can I just say, what a relief it is to have a

> soccer free summer.

>

> Bring on the cricket, more civilised and the

> spectators can be trusted to spend the day getting

> pissed and still be civil.

>

> Marvellous.


----------

Boo!!


Why did you have to come in here and swear? SOCCER?! (6)


I am most disappointed Mr P :(

No you are not!! I have a proud personal tradition of pouring scorn on the so-called beautiful game, even if I am known to sneak down to the Agborough Ground to watch Kiddie Harriers play a game of kick and rush.


Also, being a Wolves fan means that archane discussions on Premier league issues are and always will be irrelevant.

Once again the daily mash draws a line too fine to tell between fact and satire

http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/sport/sport-headlines/capello-picks-gerrard-to-miss-crucial-world-cup-penalty-20080508933/


[Capello] added: "I know these players have the right mixture of high salaries and grinding mediocrity to create a very real sense of false hope."

Hmmm, not sure to be honest Keef. Barry is a great player and it would be great to have another Englishman in the squad. That said, if we want to challenge for the Premiership next season, we'll have to buy big and I'm therefore uncertain if Barry is the man for the job.


Ted Max - re you're comments about Alonso, I'll be quite surprised if he's still at Anfield next season. Mascher was a great buy and allows Stevie to play as a second striker as he holds the midfield. I love watching him play, he's just so committed and plays with his heart on his sleeve.

atila the gooner Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> On the subject of resources, and of course I'm

> very biased, but I think Wenger has done extremely

> well given the limited money he has had at his

> disposal compared to Man Ure, Lokomotiv Fulham and

> Liverpool.


I couldn't let this one pass....I was listening to Radio 5 the other day and a journo who was pretty well connected with Arsenal was talking about this after an interesting discussion at the club AGM. According to him Arsenal have offered Wenger pots of cash to spend on transfers, far more than people would imagine, and it's a continuing and increasing annoyance to the board that he refuses to use the money. Apparently it has become almost a point of principal for Wenger to NOT spend money. So, limited money is a bit of a myth (excuse for poor performance) methinks. :-$

Sandperson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> atila the gooner Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > On the subject of resources, and of course I'm

> > very biased, but I think Wenger has done

> extremely

> > well given the limited money he has had at his

> > disposal compared to Man Ure, Lokomotiv Fulham

> and

> > Liverpool.

>

> I couldn't let this one pass....I was listening to

> Radio 5 the other day and a journo who was pretty

> well connected with Arsenal was talking about this

> after an interesting discussion at the club AGM.

> According to him Arsenal have offered Wenger pots

> of cash to spend on transfers, far more than

> people would imagine, and it's a continuing and

> increasing annoyance to the board that he refuses

> to use the money. Apparently it has become almost

> a point of principal for Wenger to NOT spend

> money. So, limited money is a bit of a myth

> (excuse for poor performance) methinks. :-$ (It is a well known proven scientific fact Man Ure fans, players, and management are incapable of thinking coherently, just look at the moron Rio Ferdinand, the guy who forgot to turn up for a doping test, very appropriate!!)

Well I couldn't let your bullshit pass. Man Ure have to spend to achieve where as we don't, and never have even when we went 49 games unbeaten. We leave that shit to Man Ure and Chavski.Same old Manu Ure fans full of MANURE.

ratty Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> 49 games unbeaten because of a Pires dive! Don't

> forget the cheating bit!! :D



Of course Pompey players and management are squeaky clean, Oh I forgot 'Arry has only just started to talk to MOTD after throwing his toys out of the pram . I hope you get stuffed at Wembley. F**k off Pompey, Pompey F**k off!!

atila the gooner Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Of course Pompey players and management are

> squeaky clean, Oh I forgot 'Arry has only just

> started to talk to MOTD after throwing his toys

> out of the pram . I hope you get stuffed at

> Wembley. F**k off Pompey, Pompey F**k off!!



Guess you will be supporting the Welsh then? Good luck to ya! ;)

Annasfield Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hmmm, not sure to be honest Keef. Barry is a great player and it would be great to have another Englishman in the squad. That said, if we want to challenge for the Premiership next season, we'll have to buy big and I'm therefore uncertain if Barry is the man for the job.




I personally think it would be a great partnership of Barry & Mascher in the middle, with Stevie G playing behind Torres! As you say Barry is a great player, and he hasn't exactly been in the best team. Man U bought Carrick, and I was a bit sceptical (no offence to Spurs), but he has become a big player for a very good team!

ratty Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> atila the gooner Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > Of course Pompey players and management are

> > squeaky clean, Oh I forgot 'Arry has only just

> > started to talk to MOTD after throwing his toys

> > out of the pram . I hope you get stuffed at

> > Wembley. F**k off Pompey, Pompey F**k off!!

>

>

> Guess you will be supporting the Welsh then? Good

> luck to ya! ;)


I'd rather support them than support a side full of Arsenal rejects, supported by mugs like the arsehole who rings a poxy bell for 90 minutes.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Don't you ever stop Atila? Give it a rest man FFS.



Do me a favour and F**K off, some mug called sandperson kicked this off, direct your comments to him. Why is it you are so f**king blind when it comes to saps like him kicking these things off. Check your f**king facts first, it might be a first on this forum.

Man Ure have to spend to achieve where as we don't, and never have even when we went 49 games unbeaten. We leave that shit to Man Ure and Chavski.Same old Manu Ure fans full of MANURE.


Ha, ha 'achieve'. Maybe you should spend some money, that way you might win more than three premiership titles in 15 years.

Sandperson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Man Ure have to spend to achieve where as we

> don't, and never have even when we went 49 games

> unbeaten. We leave that shit to Man Ure and

> Chavski.Same old Manu Ure fans full of MANURE.

>

> Ha, ha 'achieve'. Maybe you should spend some

> money, that way you might win more than three

> premiership titles in 15 years. HA HA yourself you sad midlander trying to pass for a Manc. Proves what I've always said about wankers like you, only support a club for glory. NO heart No passion No soul, just full of shit. Glory hunting wankpot.

You take the bait everytime don't you. Could have been anyone but you have blame it on someone else. You can't contain your hatred of anyone who isn't Arsenal. It's always you. You could have fight in an empty room. Same old myopic Atila.

Of course I expect your next post to be full of the usual venom and threats and insults and I'm not even gone bother to stoop to your level deign them with a reply unless by some miracle you undergo a personality change and you start to act rationally and behave yourself on this Forum. I live in hope but somehow I really doubt it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Andy is an absolute star. Have used him for years and he’s become a hugely trusted and valued friend as well as handyman. Always willing to go the extra mile and doesn’t cut corners, but great on pricing. Can’t recommend enough.
    • Surely you are still covered under these circumstances even if you don't have the physical licence? I can't believe you would be prevented from driving? That would be a ridiculous system. I don't recall any delays   when mine was renewed. Why would their medical department be involved if you have no medical issues? Could someone have made some admin mistake somewhere along the line?
    • Does anyone have the same problem.  I am 79 and have sent my licence renewal form to the DVLA on the 21st October 20 which they have received. I have just received a letter from them them dated 22 December 2025 today saying my licence is with their Drivers Medal Department and will be processed as soon as possible. This follows my telephone call to them after three weeks  from the October date as I had not received my licence back as per their time frame. I also followed this up mid December after finally getting through but did not get any confirmation as to what the situation was. Is this normal practice? On the 7 January 2026 I will be unable to drive as my licence has not been sent back. I have no medical issues and meet all the requirements with no problem as per previous renewals in fact nothing has changed health wise.Their the letter states if they need any more details from me, they will contact me directly. Why has it taken 2 and a half months get get this far? Is this some sort of ploy to get older drivers to finally give up their driving by making life difficult as possible.  Has anyone else experienced this. Read Medical not Medal.
    • You're being a little disingenuous here. It is simply not true that "the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum" because: -> the area the development is in isn't 2/3 storeys maximum today - as evidenced by the school on the lot adjoining the development to the south, as well as the similarly-sized buildings to the north and east.  -> the SPG doesn't preclude this type of development anyway. This "genie in a bottle" stuff is desperate barrel-scraping. Now you're raising the spectre of a 9 storey building on the Gibbs & Dandy site (the chance would be a fine thing) but also arguing Southwark is too slow to approve things and opposed to development more than 2-3 storeys!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...