Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Can't believe after 90 minutes of football Liverpool were looking sorted, and by the final whistles we are behind Man U and only a point in front of Chelsea. Funny old game and all that. Just hope Liverpool keep up the pace and make a good 3 way competition of it. As LadyG pointed out, last February Arsenal looked like they couldn't not win the league...

Phil Thompson's reaction on Soccer Saturday to Lampard's winner was great entertainment, Thommo was rocking back in his chair screaming, "GOOOOALLLLLL, GOOOOAAAAAAALLLLLLLL!!!!"


I watched most of the United game live on the web (via TVU Player), and to be fair teams who drive forward looking for goals deserve to get late winners more than teams who keep a defensive formation against sh!te teams for 90 minutes...


If Liverpool want to take charge of the title race they need to cut loose - that means 1) playing 4-4-2, with 2) Gerrard in central midfield and 3) Daniel Agger at centre half - and most importantly 4) priortise the scoring of goals over clean sheets.

matthew123 Wrote:


>

> I watched most of the United game live on the web

> (via TVU Player), and to be fair teams who drive

> forward looking for goals deserve to get late

> winners more than teams who keep a defensive

> formation against sh!te teams for 90 minutes...



Matthew 123 - could not agree more - think i said something similar before too = MU play to win and they get their just rewards. Liverpool I'm afraid may throw away their best chance to win the EPL unless they become more direct, especially at home.

hope liverpool can make a move on Monday night as now MU have headed them at the top, Liverpool really need to bounce back.

I went to the Vale to watch the Arsenal match -lovely comfy sofas, draught stella and warm fire - what more could a woman ask for! Incidentally they had shown the Bolton v Man U match live - shall have to keep an eye out to see what other sat 3pm games they will be showing.

matthew123 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Darrent Bent missed a point blank header from 5

> yards with a few minutes to go - Harry Redknapp

> went ballistic over it!



I was praying he might keel over but no luck.


Pompey played their socks off and only luck stopped this being another 4-1 against a Judas side bound for relegation. I agree with Jah that Spurs were appauling. Definitely another team to be taken down by Redknapp.


PUP! ;)

West Ham 8th and Spurs 16th and this is the most miserable day ever! hmmm looks pretty good to me


According to experts today is the most depressing day of the year, or as the pessimists at the Daily Mail put it: "The most depressing day in HISTORY".


Toay is apparently so depressing it has been predicated that up to a quarter of workers would call in sick.


Cliff Arnall, a former psychology academic at Cardiff University, claims that there are six factors that combine to make today the ultimate of all bad days:


Lousy weather

Post-Christmas debt

Failed New Year's resolutions

Time elapsed since Christmas festivities

Motivation levels

The need for something to look forward to

My mum could have scored with that header that Bent missed in the final minutes and she's been dead for 15 years.

The only plusses in the game for us was our improvement in the second half and Defoe's fabulous equalising finish. We ain't going down. No way.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • These statements were in the Consultation Findings report published (later than promised) just before the licence was granted:  "The site hire fee goes directly to supporting the delivery of the council’s Events service, which supports the delivery of up to 100 free-to-attend community events per year – please refer to section 1 (Licensing and income)" I've drafted an email to request some more details of these "free-to-attend" events, as "up to" is a fairly meaningless description - could be 100, could be none? - and therefore doesn't help anyone to decide whether it is actually a benefit to the community or not. Even if it is 100, I'm not sure I could name even one of them? "The site hire fee goes directly to supporting the provision of a grants fund – the Cultural Celebrations programme - please refer to section 1 (Licensing and income)" A similarly meaningless statement in terms of gauging whether, or how much, this is a benefit to the local community. What is it, what does it do, how much of the fee goes to it? And how can the fee go "directly" to two different things? Surely, "directly" means without deviation, straight to, without being changed or reduced?? Again, I'll be asking all these questions to the events dept. I find it outrageous & insulting that a public body can try to justify such an intrusive & disruptive event with such flimsy and opaque "benefits", with zero figures or details to quantify them. They may as well not bother with a consultation, just say "Look, we can't be arsed to justify our decision, it's happening so just deal with it".  
    • Thanks so much. Yes I have. Really appreciate your kindness in replying. Thank you.
    • Have you posted on Nextdoor? There's a big cat community on there. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...