Jump to content

Recommended Posts

hi just wondering at what age you all start taking your little ones to the cinema? my daughter is 2.5 and I wasnt going to take her until she was about 3 or older but with such a good film out im tempted to take her but maybe she is still too young? She will sit all the way through movies at home but not sure if on a big screen she will find it all too much.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/12350-toy-story-3/#findComment-343815
Share on other sites

ludoscotts, have been having the same dilemma wrt my 3yo... he loves Toy Story but am concerned that he won't be able to sit through a whole film. Also my mum (who hasn't seen it) rang me yesterday specifically to warn me against taking him to see it because it's 'too scary' and 'too emotional'). So now if I take him and he freaks out it's all my own fault.. damnation.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/12350-toy-story-3/#findComment-343826
Share on other sites

I took my little man for the first time just before his 3rd birthday and he was fine... a bit in awe of the huge tv and sat on my knee the entire film holding my hands and putting it over his face if a little scared but generally got on well (it was the princess and the frog).... took him again at 3 yrs 3 months to see Shrek (he loves the other films) and this time he sat in a chair and seemed to love it although it is a little difficult to keep the running commentary from him at an acceptable volume... we are goin to to and see TOy Story this weekend or next as he keeps asking when he can go to the cinema again and he LOVES Toy Story.....
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/12350-toy-story-3/#findComment-343870
Share on other sites

I first took my daughter to a cinema when she was 2.5. Croydon Vue does kids am on Saturday mornings and the films are usually short, and there are lots of kids. Its also very cheap so can leave when she gets tired without feeling too terrible. My daughter shocked me as she was alert for the whole hour and narrated the story after. Thinking about taking her to Toy Story as she loves it, but wondering if the 3D version would be too much for her.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/12350-toy-story-3/#findComment-344080
Share on other sites

reneet - the 3D isn't that dramatic and I wouldn't think too scary, though getting her to wear the glasses might be more of a challenge - when our daughter watched Up in 3D last year she wouldn't wear them so the whole thing must have been a bit of a blur to her! She managed them for Toy Story 3 though (now aged 5) Enjoy!
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/12350-toy-story-3/#findComment-344137
Share on other sites

giggirl Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I so want to see this movie. Loved the first two.

> Is it compulsory to take a kid? Can anyone lend

> me one as I don't want to look out of place.

> Thanks.


Please feel free to borrow one of mine anytime. I have two you can choose from, one of each flavour. Though neither of them really knows how to behave..........

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/12350-toy-story-3/#findComment-344835
Share on other sites

Hi ludoscotts,

I can't wait to take my son to see this when they return from a week with grandma.

I hadn't realised before that U graded cinema films is for kids 4 and over. As no film is ever graded lower than a U the censorship board must think all cinema films should be seen by people older than 4. My 6 year old daughter finds all films at cinemas overwhelm her so perhaps censorship people have some research or something to back up the 4 year old.


Regards james.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/12350-toy-story-3/#findComment-345465
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
    • Yes, all this. Totally Sephiroth. The electorate wants to see transformation overnight. That's not possible. But what is possible is leading with the right comms strategy, which isn't cutting through. As I've said before, messaging matters more now than policy, that's the only way to bring the electorate with you. And I worry that that's how Reform's going to get into power.  And the media LOVES Reform. 
    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...