Jump to content

2018 trains timetable consultation


Jakido

Recommended Posts

Well that's a dry old read. I could have this very wrong but scanning down to pages 50-51 looks like proposal for trains through East Dulwich is:


6 trains per hour Mon-Fri peak times

(route SN3.9 *2/hr from Beckenham Junction; route SN3.10A *2/hr from Croydon but to Selhurst; route SN3.12 *2/hr from Sutton)


Mon-Sat daytime: 4 trains per hour:

(route SN3.9 *2/hr from Beckenham Junction; route SN3.10 *2/hr from Caterham)


Mon-Sat evenings: 6 trains per hour

(route SN3.9 *2/hr from Crystal Palace; route SN3.10 and SN3.10A *4/hr from West Croydon(2) and Caterham(2)


Sunday: 4 trains per hour

(route SN3.9 *2/hr from Crystal Palace; route SN3.10A *2/hr from East Croydon but to Selhurst)


If that is what happens probably about right (if they are reliable!!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For those who use Forest Hill or Honor Oak Park.


2tph to West Croydon (Formerly Caterham trains, so the loss of the direct service to East Croydon)

2tph to Victoria including Sunday for the first time.

4tph to London Bridge (as now)


Reduction of peak services to London Bridge in the morning peak from 6 to 5 per hour.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like they are cutting off easy access to Gatwick Airport for this part of South London. It was always an easy 15 minutes from Forest Hill to East Croydon and another 15 from there to Gatwick. They have even recently made it Oyster card all the way. It's not clear about the service from East Dulwich to East Croydon. It looks like there might be some outside of peak hours but I honestly can't decipher their notes and sub-notes. It may be the only way left to avoid going into Victoria and catching the Gatwick Express is overground from Denmark Hill to Clapham Junction and a train from there.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Page 50:

"Southern Metro Routes SN3.9, SN3.10/10A combine to provide four trains per hour (daily) between London Bridge and Tulse Hill. During Monday to Friday peaks, six trains per hour will be provided when Route SN3.12 is operating."


Page 51:

Route SN3.12:London Bridge to and from Sutton: 2tph (every 30 mins) during Mon-Fri peaks

London Bridge? Tulse Hill ? Mitcham Eastfields ? Sutton

Serving: London Bridge, South Bermondsey, Queens Road Peckham, Peckham Rye, East Dulwich, North Dulwich, Tulse Hill, Streatham, Tooting, Haydons Road, Wimbledon, Wimbledon Chase, South Merton, Morden South, St Helier, Sutton Common, West Sutton and Sutton. Trains will generally continue to Mitcham Eastfields and London Blackfriars as Route SN3.11


So yes, 6tph in peak hours and 4tph off-peak

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's the same. Despite rising numbers of passengers, we've not seen any increase in the service for more than a decade (they have gone up and down in that time, but never above the levels they were originally at). So this part of London got absolutely nothing from LB works and associated disruption.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think it's the same. Despite rising numbers of

> passengers, we've not seen any increase in the

> service for more than a decade (they have gone up

> and down in that time, but never above the levels

> they were originally at). So this part of London

> got absolutely nothing from LB works and

> associated disruption.


Has anyone expected more then six trains per hour at rush hour? No-one's moved here with the expectation of the trains being more frequent, so if it goes back to our previous maximum and is reliable, I'll be fine with that. The whole point of the LB redevelopment is to change the nature of certain journeys, especially through services, to improve the network as a whole. Being nicer to people in East Dulwich is, in all honesty, not in the same league when it comes to justifying the investment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's hard to see how to increase the capacity beyond 6tph.


Peckham Rye/Queens Road Peckham will handle 10tph on each of the tracks through platforms 1 and 2 in the peaks (6tph to/from London Bridge and 4tph London Overground) from 2018.


That's one train every 6 minutes.


Combine that with the aim of TfL to have 8tph on the Overground through Peckham Rye, that would mean 14tph or one about every 4 minutes.


Just a 3 minute delay would have a serious knock-one effect with limited capacity at London Bridge.


The proposals seem to reinstate what East Dulwich had 10 years ago with some improvements (earlier/later trains).


Offset by the loss of direct Croydon trains.


Note! This is not Southern or Thameslink being generous, this is effectively a government run consultation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They didn't exactly make it easy to make sense of this document... But from what I can see they are doubling the trains per hour from Denmark Hill and Peckham Rye through the Thameslink core. Routes TL8 and TL9 on page 21. They even have a note after TL9 to say that it is four trains per hour. At the moment it is usually 2 tph (one starts in Sevenoaks the other starts in Orpington, and they are annoyingly close together at times).


I believe all of them will run through the core (i.e. go north of Blackfriars) at peak times, during the day only 2 of them will run through the core. Not sure if all 4 will run north of Blackfriars at night (after peak hours).


It also looks like some Thameslink services will run through London Bridge, so some trains will go London Bridge - Blackfriars - City Thameslink - Farringdon etc. I don't think any of the 6 East Dulwich - London Bridge trains will do this, but hopefully you'll be able to hop straight onto one of these through trains. This would be great as it's an easy walk for me to East Dulwich, no more traipsing out to Peckham Rye. I'm sure I remember this being one of the travel route options in the distant past - it feels like London Bridge redevelopment has been going on my whole life!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All trains going through ED will terminate at London Bridge.


The logistics of having through trains to other destinations would require ?billions!


It is now much easier to change at London Bridge - down onto the concourse and back up again for Charing X; with Cannon St/Blackfriars etc. available again from 2018.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

bargee99 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Looks like they are cutting off easy access to

> Gatwick Airport for this part of South London. It

> was always an easy 15 minutes from Forest Hill to

> East Croydon and another 15 from there to Gatwick.

> They have even recently made it Oyster card all

> the way. It's not clear about the service from

> East Dulwich to East Croydon. It looks like there

> might be some outside of peak hours but I honestly

> can't decipher their notes and sub-notes. It may

> be the only way left to avoid going into Victoria

> and catching the Gatwick Express is overground

> from Denmark Hill to Clapham Junction and a train

> from there.


It is annoying to lose direct link to East Croydon though emergency timetables have meant it hasn't been running the last few times I have wanted it. Presumably though it would still be quicker to get the West Croydon train and switch at Norwood Junction for East Croydon and Gatwick. Outside rush hour, even the 197 to East Croydon might be just as quick as the schlep to Clapham especially with luggage in tow

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jim1234 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There's no indication of timings are there? For me

> the trains per hour doesn't mean much if they're

> not evenly spaced.


The consultation document states that during the peak there will be three services running 2tph at 30 min intervals (6tph total).


Trains have at least 10 minute turnaround time at London Bridge, and there's probably only two platforms available at any one time for Dulwich services.


In addition you need at least 5 minutes between services arriving/departing to run a reliable service.


The only way to get 6tph is to have them every 10 minutes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lowlander Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jim1234 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > There's no indication of timings are there? For

> me

> > the trains per hour doesn't mean much if

> they're

> > not evenly spaced.

>

> The consultation document states that during the

> peak there will be three services running 2tph at

> 30 min intervals (6tph total).

>

> Trains have at least 10 minute turnaround time at

> London Bridge, and there's probably only two

> platforms available at any one time for Dulwich

> services.

>

> In addition you need at least 5 minutes between

> services arriving/departing to run a reliable

> service.

>

> The only way to get 6tph is to have them every 10

> minutes.



or to run late then cancel one of them :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Applespider, I'm not familiar with all the different connections to Gatwick so will look at the Norwood Junction route as an option. There appears to be a slow train from there every 1/2 hour at the moment. Fastest to change at East Croydon but as you say with luggage that's not great. The Clapham Junction route is not such a trial as you may think since it is only 14 minutes from Denmark Hill to Clapham Junction on the overground. If you are close to the station it makes more sense than any other route. Total time to Gatwick from there an hour within a few minutes either way. For early morning flights the 197 to East Croydon is great but after that I can't imagine getting there faster than the trains by whatever route you chose. It is just annoying to lose what was the simplest route of all and seems very shortsighted, unless you think it is deliberate, to cut off easy access to a major airport for large parts of South London.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Norwood Junction isn't exactly access friendly for disabled passengers either if they have to walk up and down the stairs, which a wheelchair user won't be able to use.


While it also has Gatwick trains, those are the slow ones via Redhill, so in effect a three train change from Forest Hill.


I'd speculate Southern are diverting those trains to West Croydon in preparation for a potential TfL takeover in 2021.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As this is a consultation the the loss of trains to Gatwick from SE London is absolutely something that should be fed back as part of the consultation - and the more voices (ideally supported by our councillors and MP) to that effect the better. At a time when the use of public transport is more important, and when Gatwick might still be the preferred supplier of an additional London airport runway, there is no excuse to let this one slip by.


Edited to say - I believe the relevant question to respond to is Q60 here https://www.surveymonkey.co.uk/r/2018timetableconsultation - it is well hidden.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Excellent point Penguin - It is well hidden.


On the Norwood Junction point (assuming they are not also losing trains), I haven't had to change platforms with my luggage on the way there - it's been cross platform. I know Clapham isn't that far from Denmark Hill but when you live closer to FH, then that's another 15-20 mins just to get there - suddenly one bus to EC with a heavy suitcase even if it takes slightly longer looks less painful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The original council proposals for the area around the Dulwich cross roads were made well before Covid - and were rejected then by locals. The council used the Covid legislation to push through the LTNs when opposition was not allowed. LTNs, as experiments were some good (reduced traffic in areas which did not push traffic elsewhere and which did meet the needs of residents - typically in places very well served by public transport and where the topology (absence e.g. of hills) allowed wide use of cycling and walking - not as it happens a good description of the Dulwich (inc ED, WD and ND) areas.)  Dulwich never met Southwark's own description of ideal LTN areas, but did happen to match Southwark Councillor ambitions dating way back. One Dulwich has been clear, I believe that it is anti this LTN but not, necessarily all LTNs per se. But as it is One Dulwich is has not stated views about LTNs in general. In the main those prepared to make a view known, in Dulwich, have not supported the Council's LTN ambitions locally - whilst some, living in the LTN area, have gained personal benefit. But it would appear not even a majority of those living in the LTN area have supported the LTN. And certainly not those living immediately outside the area where traffic has worsened. As a resident of Underhill, a remaining access route to the South Circular, I can confirm that I am suffering increased traffic and blockages in rush hours whilst living some way away from the LTN. All this - 'I want to name the guilty parties' -' is One Dulwich a secret fascists cabal whose only interest is being anti-Labour?' conspiracy theorising is frankly irrelevant - whoever they are they seem to represent feelings of a majority of actual residents either in the LTNs, or in parts of Dulwich impacted by the LTNs. And I'm beginning to find these 'Answer me this...' tirades frankly irritating.
    • Hi Everyone … I've been a cleaner for 17 years, I work punctually and responsibly, leaving  your home is clean and organized. The experience includes: *Private Houses *High cleaning standards. *Ironing  *Deep Cleaner  *5 star Airbnb    Send me a message and booking a  trial. And get a DISCOUNT 😀 📲07889693871 (WhatsApp Just)   Thanks  Gra
    • Ok here goes.....   Since day 1 of the LTNs the emergency services have been very clear - blocked roads increase response times. Southwark councillors were more than aware of this from the beginning of the LTN debacle during Covid because, when the council were going LTN mad and were trying to carpet bomb them everywhere they had suggested one for Peckham Rye and had initiated a consultation. As usual they took glowing endorsements of their proposal to close parts of Peckham Rye from the cycle lobby but got negative feedback from TFL and the emergency services due to the disruption their physical closure barriers were going to have - the emergency services made their preference clear that they do not like physical barriers. Needless to say Southwark ignored that emergency service input and pushed ahead with their plans only to cancel them when the realised LTNs were turning residents against them.   Now the video below (from March 2021) is interesting from a couple of perspectives: 1) Clearly LAS were making their feelings on permanent closures very clear to Southwark - please scroll to 1 hour 4 minutes to hear from them - 51 of the 170 delays caused by LTNs in London were in Southwark - yet it took over a year for emergency vehicles to be given access and, if I remember correctly FOIs showed that LAS had been writing to Dale Foden and the council alerting them to the delays. So why the delay and why is there a constant narrative from local lobby groups that the junction has to be closed to ALL traffic (including emergency vehicles) and why the new designs return to a partial full closure of the junction - most rational and pragmatic people can surely see that the compromise installed in 2022 to allow emergency vehicle access was the most sensible approach.   The council put the desires of local lobby groups ahead of the emergency services...which is madness...and then that leads us to point 2)....   2) Notice the presence of Jeremy Leach on the call - not a councillor but the Co-Optee of the council's environmental scrutiny committee and he is constantly pushing the councillors to do more to deal with traffic issues and reduce traffic. I suspect he is deemed one of the "expert" voices the council was turning to for guidance at this period. But, much like the activist researchers the council turned to Jeremy is very much an "activist expert" and was chair of the London Living Streets, co-founder of Action Vision Zero and part of Southwark Cyclists - so you can see why if the council was taking guidance and direction from him how they may have not been making decisions in the public interest. Clearly someone has convinced the council that the junction needs to be closed to all vehicles as there cannot be any other explanation for why they held out for so long (that created increased response times) - remember they are wasting another £1.5m to close one arm of the roads permanently again - honestly if someone wants to enlighten me to a part of this story I am missing then feel free but to me it looks like something very odd has been going on at the DV junction and the council is ignoring the majority and listening to the few...   https://lrscconference.org.uk/index.php/agenda-speakers/jeremy-leach-co-founder-action-vision-zero/     No it was 64% of the total who lived in the consultation area - 57% when the council looked at all the respondents to the consultation.   3,162 (64%) wanted it returned to its original state 823 (17%) wanted it retained as was 422 (8%) wanted a different measure installed 564 (11%) wanted the measure, but modify/ enhance it with other features   So back then the 11% got their wish!   In every consultation in relation to the DV junction there has been overwhelming rejection of the council's plans by local residents - yet they carry-on wasting our money on it regardless - just who are they trying to placate?
    • Calton was particularly hideous. An ambulance wouldn’t have got anywhere fast.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...