Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Well that's a dry old read. I could have this very wrong but scanning down to pages 50-51 looks like proposal for trains through East Dulwich is:


6 trains per hour Mon-Fri peak times

(route SN3.9 *2/hr from Beckenham Junction; route SN3.10A *2/hr from Croydon but to Selhurst; route SN3.12 *2/hr from Sutton)


Mon-Sat daytime: 4 trains per hour:

(route SN3.9 *2/hr from Beckenham Junction; route SN3.10 *2/hr from Caterham)


Mon-Sat evenings: 6 trains per hour

(route SN3.9 *2/hr from Crystal Palace; route SN3.10 and SN3.10A *4/hr from West Croydon(2) and Caterham(2)


Sunday: 4 trains per hour

(route SN3.9 *2/hr from Crystal Palace; route SN3.10A *2/hr from East Croydon but to Selhurst)


If that is what happens probably about right (if they are reliable!!)

For those who use Forest Hill or Honor Oak Park.


2tph to West Croydon (Formerly Caterham trains, so the loss of the direct service to East Croydon)

2tph to Victoria including Sunday for the first time.

4tph to London Bridge (as now)


Reduction of peak services to London Bridge in the morning peak from 6 to 5 per hour.

Looks like they are cutting off easy access to Gatwick Airport for this part of South London. It was always an easy 15 minutes from Forest Hill to East Croydon and another 15 from there to Gatwick. They have even recently made it Oyster card all the way. It's not clear about the service from East Dulwich to East Croydon. It looks like there might be some outside of peak hours but I honestly can't decipher their notes and sub-notes. It may be the only way left to avoid going into Victoria and catching the Gatwick Express is overground from Denmark Hill to Clapham Junction and a train from there.

Page 50:

"Southern Metro Routes SN3.9, SN3.10/10A combine to provide four trains per hour (daily) between London Bridge and Tulse Hill. During Monday to Friday peaks, six trains per hour will be provided when Route SN3.12 is operating."


Page 51:

Route SN3.12:London Bridge to and from Sutton: 2tph (every 30 mins) during Mon-Fri peaks

London Bridge? Tulse Hill ? Mitcham Eastfields ? Sutton

Serving: London Bridge, South Bermondsey, Queens Road Peckham, Peckham Rye, East Dulwich, North Dulwich, Tulse Hill, Streatham, Tooting, Haydons Road, Wimbledon, Wimbledon Chase, South Merton, Morden South, St Helier, Sutton Common, West Sutton and Sutton. Trains will generally continue to Mitcham Eastfields and London Blackfriars as Route SN3.11


So yes, 6tph in peak hours and 4tph off-peak

I think it's the same. Despite rising numbers of passengers, we've not seen any increase in the service for more than a decade (they have gone up and down in that time, but never above the levels they were originally at). So this part of London got absolutely nothing from LB works and associated disruption.
Just found the link to Thameslink consultation page. They have provided a good station by station comparison spreadsheet. Looks like Denmark Hill will get an extra train. All now terminating at Blackfriars (if I've read it correctly). http://www.thameslinkrailway.com/your-journey/timetable-consultation/

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think it's the same. Despite rising numbers of

> passengers, we've not seen any increase in the

> service for more than a decade (they have gone up

> and down in that time, but never above the levels

> they were originally at). So this part of London

> got absolutely nothing from LB works and

> associated disruption.


Has anyone expected more then six trains per hour at rush hour? No-one's moved here with the expectation of the trains being more frequent, so if it goes back to our previous maximum and is reliable, I'll be fine with that. The whole point of the LB redevelopment is to change the nature of certain journeys, especially through services, to improve the network as a whole. Being nicer to people in East Dulwich is, in all honesty, not in the same league when it comes to justifying the investment.

It's hard to see how to increase the capacity beyond 6tph.


Peckham Rye/Queens Road Peckham will handle 10tph on each of the tracks through platforms 1 and 2 in the peaks (6tph to/from London Bridge and 4tph London Overground) from 2018.


That's one train every 6 minutes.


Combine that with the aim of TfL to have 8tph on the Overground through Peckham Rye, that would mean 14tph or one about every 4 minutes.


Just a 3 minute delay would have a serious knock-one effect with limited capacity at London Bridge.


The proposals seem to reinstate what East Dulwich had 10 years ago with some improvements (earlier/later trains).


Offset by the loss of direct Croydon trains.


Note! This is not Southern or Thameslink being generous, this is effectively a government run consultation.

They didn't exactly make it easy to make sense of this document... But from what I can see they are doubling the trains per hour from Denmark Hill and Peckham Rye through the Thameslink core. Routes TL8 and TL9 on page 21. They even have a note after TL9 to say that it is four trains per hour. At the moment it is usually 2 tph (one starts in Sevenoaks the other starts in Orpington, and they are annoyingly close together at times).


I believe all of them will run through the core (i.e. go north of Blackfriars) at peak times, during the day only 2 of them will run through the core. Not sure if all 4 will run north of Blackfriars at night (after peak hours).


It also looks like some Thameslink services will run through London Bridge, so some trains will go London Bridge - Blackfriars - City Thameslink - Farringdon etc. I don't think any of the 6 East Dulwich - London Bridge trains will do this, but hopefully you'll be able to hop straight onto one of these through trains. This would be great as it's an easy walk for me to East Dulwich, no more traipsing out to Peckham Rye. I'm sure I remember this being one of the travel route options in the distant past - it feels like London Bridge redevelopment has been going on my whole life!

All trains going through ED will terminate at London Bridge.


The logistics of having through trains to other destinations would require ?billions!


It is now much easier to change at London Bridge - down onto the concourse and back up again for Charing X; with Cannon St/Blackfriars etc. available again from 2018.

bargee99 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Looks like they are cutting off easy access to

> Gatwick Airport for this part of South London. It

> was always an easy 15 minutes from Forest Hill to

> East Croydon and another 15 from there to Gatwick.

> They have even recently made it Oyster card all

> the way. It's not clear about the service from

> East Dulwich to East Croydon. It looks like there

> might be some outside of peak hours but I honestly

> can't decipher their notes and sub-notes. It may

> be the only way left to avoid going into Victoria

> and catching the Gatwick Express is overground

> from Denmark Hill to Clapham Junction and a train

> from there.


It is annoying to lose direct link to East Croydon though emergency timetables have meant it hasn't been running the last few times I have wanted it. Presumably though it would still be quicker to get the West Croydon train and switch at Norwood Junction for East Croydon and Gatwick. Outside rush hour, even the 197 to East Croydon might be just as quick as the schlep to Clapham especially with luggage in tow

Jim1234 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There's no indication of timings are there? For me

> the trains per hour doesn't mean much if they're

> not evenly spaced.


The consultation document states that during the peak there will be three services running 2tph at 30 min intervals (6tph total).


Trains have at least 10 minute turnaround time at London Bridge, and there's probably only two platforms available at any one time for Dulwich services.


In addition you need at least 5 minutes between services arriving/departing to run a reliable service.


The only way to get 6tph is to have them every 10 minutes.

Lowlander Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jim1234 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > There's no indication of timings are there? For

> me

> > the trains per hour doesn't mean much if

> they're

> > not evenly spaced.

>

> The consultation document states that during the

> peak there will be three services running 2tph at

> 30 min intervals (6tph total).

>

> Trains have at least 10 minute turnaround time at

> London Bridge, and there's probably only two

> platforms available at any one time for Dulwich

> services.

>

> In addition you need at least 5 minutes between

> services arriving/departing to run a reliable

> service.

>

> The only way to get 6tph is to have them every 10

> minutes.



or to run late then cancel one of them :)

Thanks Applespider, I'm not familiar with all the different connections to Gatwick so will look at the Norwood Junction route as an option. There appears to be a slow train from there every 1/2 hour at the moment. Fastest to change at East Croydon but as you say with luggage that's not great. The Clapham Junction route is not such a trial as you may think since it is only 14 minutes from Denmark Hill to Clapham Junction on the overground. If you are close to the station it makes more sense than any other route. Total time to Gatwick from there an hour within a few minutes either way. For early morning flights the 197 to East Croydon is great but after that I can't imagine getting there faster than the trains by whatever route you chose. It is just annoying to lose what was the simplest route of all and seems very shortsighted, unless you think it is deliberate, to cut off easy access to a major airport for large parts of South London.

Norwood Junction isn't exactly access friendly for disabled passengers either if they have to walk up and down the stairs, which a wheelchair user won't be able to use.


While it also has Gatwick trains, those are the slow ones via Redhill, so in effect a three train change from Forest Hill.


I'd speculate Southern are diverting those trains to West Croydon in preparation for a potential TfL takeover in 2021.

As this is a consultation the the loss of trains to Gatwick from SE London is absolutely something that should be fed back as part of the consultation - and the more voices (ideally supported by our councillors and MP) to that effect the better. At a time when the use of public transport is more important, and when Gatwick might still be the preferred supplier of an additional London airport runway, there is no excuse to let this one slip by.


Edited to say - I believe the relevant question to respond to is Q60 here https://www.surveymonkey.co.uk/r/2018timetableconsultation - it is well hidden.

Excellent point Penguin - It is well hidden.


On the Norwood Junction point (assuming they are not also losing trains), I haven't had to change platforms with my luggage on the way there - it's been cross platform. I know Clapham isn't that far from Denmark Hill but when you live closer to FH, then that's another 15-20 mins just to get there - suddenly one bus to EC with a heavy suitcase even if it takes slightly longer looks less painful.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Sorry, not having a dig at Southwark for that.   I'm just shocked that next door they've chosen to abandon such an institutional community / family event so they can keep pumping out commercial stuff instead.   I suppose the same could happen here next although we don't really have any longstanding family events like that one.
    • No doubt the schools in Harrogate are being discussed on the East Harrogate Forum or whatever. Dulwich College is being discussed because it's local. Saying "ooh, there were loads of schools mentioned" is a bit dismissive. It was Dulwich College that referred sex abuse allegations about pupils to the police and Dulwich College that used the spectre of the police to suppress dissent. 🤔
    • Hi, I was just wondering what experiences any of you have had in relation to an Independent Panel review relating to the Permanent Exclusion of a SEN child. 1. General experience Any experiences, positive or negative, in general? 2. Clerks Associates UK Any experience of this entity acting as an "independent clerk" to an Independent Review Panel in a matter involving a Permanent Exclusion of a SEN pupil, also involving discrimination under the Equality Act 2010. There is limited publicly available information with regards to this "independent clerk"; however, I can see from their Annual Report & Accounts at Companies House that they are a small, privately owned organisation.   I am very concerned that there is a clear and material risk that they are highly dependent for their revenues and cash flow from the business that they receive from the school and its parent Trust (which has 9 schools in total under its management) who have appointed them. I also note that the Trust has a material employee relations dispute with their staff over underpayment of maternity pay whilst materially increasing the salaries of the highest paid Trust executives and other highly paid staff (presumably the Head Teachers). https://southwarknews.co.uk/news/community/teachers-at-six-charter-schools-walk-out-in-first-of-four-strike-days-planned-for-this-month/ Given the current situation, we have no choice but to engage in this process of an Independent Panel Review; however, we are concerned as to various elements including this one which is a key role in providing independence. 3. Independent SEN expert We have the right to an independent SEN expert to review the matter and provide their opinion to the Independent Review Panel. The concept is that this person is supposedly acting "independently" and also solely in respect of the SEN elements of the matter. We do not however know who this person is, their experience or level of independence. The last information that I can find in the public domain about the effectiveness of an Independent SEN expert is a UK govt report from 2014 which portrays a very mixed experience for parents. Hence, we are seeking to understand if anyone has any more recent experience of an Independent SEN expert in relation to an Independent Panel Review. Many thanks for any thoughts that you have based on your experience. For reasons of confidentiality, it is perhaps better to send any replies to me directly. Many thanks
    • Hang in there, friends. Most of us appreciate that you're trying you best and these companies are a nightmare!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...