Jump to content

Recommended Posts

MrBen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Somewhere in the distance.....a dog barked....

________________________________________________________


Ah Ha...



Made you look , made you stare ( at the waitrose site & staying ON topic )



* big GRIN *



W**F

This isn't any old Farmer...


*soft porn soudtrack plays*


http://www.waitrose.com/assets/img/content/productrange_meat.jpg This is a Waitrose Farmer...


..and this isn't any old "Back Breaking" work..


http://www.waitrose.com/assets/img/content/organicpickers.jpg ..this is Waitrose Back Breaking work



..and this isn't YOUR Waitrose Supermarket


ds_home_image.gif This is Beckenham's Waitrose Supermarket


So get over it....


http://www.waitrose.com/assets/img/christmas08/logos/waitrose.gif

NOT ON A HIGH STREET ANYWHERE NEAR YOU



W**F

I think there're a few home-truths that need to be told to a number of posters on this thread. Allow me to enlighten those currently in the dark...


Mark Price, M.D. of Waitrose was interviewed in the last week or so on Radio4's 'You and Yours' programme. He was asked what the process is in selecting a site for Waitrose. The first - and most critical - is the propensity of the resident demographic to prefer/wish/want/do to shop at Waitrose. Like it or not this will be that old chestnut of demographics. The second - but almost as critical factor - is finding suitable premises. These premises need to be of a certain size in square feet, have a certain amount of parking etc. It's unlikely that a new site will be built that is large enough due to local resistance so they either have to take over a current site (they could take over your Iceland for example or oust another chain, as they did in Lewes) or build a smaller convenience store.


I'm afraid to be the bearer of bad news but it's clear that East Dulwich simply failed on the first point. There clearly aren't enough people in East Dulwich who fall within the highest social grade. Hence, why you aren't getting a Waitrose. I wonder what Mick Mac's point is? You say you get Waitrose to deliver. I assume you mean Ocado? You do know Ocado are nothing to do with Waitrose? They're outsourced, you know? Assuming you actually mean Waitrose's own service the one in Sydders will not be big enough to offer this service. Wishful thinking old chap that they're setting up in Sydders to merely service ED but woefully innacurate!


Sydders is an odd one. Clealry Waitrose sees the amount of affluence that is here; despite the hideous 'shop-window' of a High St we currently have. Sydders has a number of '7figure' roads. It has a number of residential conservation areas. It has the ripple-effect of Sydenham High for Girls here on Westwood Hill - I believe it came the highest of any 'GDST' public school within London in the tables? Look it up if you don't know what the gdst is. The last census showed a fairly sizeable proportion of it's residents in the highest-social grade. Crane your neck around the High St next time you drive through and you might be surprised at the pleasant well-heeled streets you spy. Probably keep your eyes shut though when you get down to Lower Sydenham/Bell Green though! There has been a great deal of gang trouble around the 'Home Park' area.


It's also brilliantly connected with the new ELL (overground) giving us 8 air-conditioned trains to the city/docklands an hour plus our 4 p.h. from Southern to L.Bridge. The next phase of the ELL will link us up to Clapham although we have 2 p.h. to there currently anyway with Southern. We'll pass to First Capital Connect in a year or thereabouts so trains will go to Blackfriars etc instead...it's becoming a real City-boys haunt. I should know...


Yes, we do have a shabby High St. But this week sees a wet-fish bar and organic butchers opening up. The problem with the High St is it currently primarily serves the residents of the estates that we have who cannot afford to nor have means to travel. So there's a few too many lower-rent stores (?shops etc). We've had possibly the best gastropub within a 5mile radius open up to rave reviews and we've got JH Skincare and Alhambra actually defect form ED. Blue Mountain is doing incredibly well as is the independent coffee shop...seems the only shops that are closing down are the purveyors of tat! Mercifully. TfL are about to spend in the order of ?4M doing up the High St for pedestrians and motor-vehicles.


Yes, this is slightly verbose but I thought it worthwhile pointing out that there are good reasons for Waitrose coming to Sydders and not to ED. Like it or not, it's down to cold, hard business reasons. BTW - we've got a Co-op too! And no, I don't work for anything connected to any Civic Society or Lewisham Council. I don't know if Sydders is being gentrified, more a case of being re-gentrified as it was once rather posh and could in time be so again. I'm not sure East Dulwich was ever anything more than where those that served in the large homes in Dulwich Village and Sydenham Hill lived? But I will admit it's done a better job of marketing itself than Sydders. For what it's worth I thought it was M&S Simply Food that was slated to come to 'The Greyhound' development in Sydders but there's another place that Waitrose can move into.


Hurrah for Waitrose!

Sheesh it's just a shop folks. They don't even sell pickled onion Monster Munch and the air conditioning is too cold. I went in the other day to get one of those bottles of Sauvignon Blanc with the bicycle on it that they sell and I like. The sort that goes perfectly with pickled onion Monster Munch but did they have any? Did they buggery.


Had to get my puffed corn snack from the petrol station.

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sheesh it's just a shop folks. They don't even

> sell pickled onion Monster Munch and the air

> conditioning is too cold. I went in the other day

> to get one of those bottles of Sauvignon Blanc

> with the bicycle on it that they sell and I like.

> The sort that goes perfectly with pickled onion

> Monster Munch but did they have any? Did they

> buggery.

>

> Had to get my puffed corn snack from the petrol

> station.




Erm, Waitrose do actually stock Pickled Onion Monster Munch. I know as it's something of an occasional guilty pleasure. They'll even deliver it via WaitroseDeliver! I'll pick you some up when our Waitrose arrives, if you like?

Generally I'm liking the big up for Sydenham.


BUT!


  Quote
We've had possibly the best gastropub within a 5mile radius open up to rave reviews


Please don't tell me you're talking about The Dolphin? It's not even as good as it's sister pub The Dartmouth Arms. Very disappointing food. (and the Sydenham forum would prove that I'm not alone in thinking that).

SalubriousSyddersin Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


* to the tune of "look into my eyes " *



" Erm, Waitrosssssse do actually ssssstock Pickled Onion

Monssssster Munch. I know as it'ss ssssomething of an

occasssssssssional guilty pleas-ssssure. They'll even deliver

it via WaitrosssssseDeliver!"




http://images2.disneysites.com/clipart/images41/Movies/Robin_Hood/Sir_Hiss/sir-hiss01.gif "I'll pick you sssssome up when....

SSssssss..our Waitrosssssse arrivesssss, if you like?


( now looook into my eyessss..ssss )




Kinda creepy eh..?




W**F

I do Keef.


I rate T.D.A. but would suggest it's a decent restaurant with a pub tabbed on (most tables are for dining only) and The Dolphin is mostly a pub that serves decent food. And it does serve very decent food. I've been going regularly since it opened (about twice a week) and have yet to have a poor meal. Perhaps I've just been lucky but looking at the overwhelmingly favourable reviews on STF I don't think I'm alone.


Where most of the negative press appears to be is regarding service at the bar (or lack therof when it's busy) and with the Sunday Lunches. I'd be interested to know if the people who don't like their visits suffer from this lack of bar-presence elsewhere and what their frame of reference is re: the food. For example I think the roasts/food at the Dog in Dulwich Village are truly horrid but I know of many who rave about them. It's all relative.


Anyway, it's rammed when you'd expect it be rammed (to be fair we don't have a great deal of choice) and given that it holds so many but gets so little negative press tells you they're doing more right than wrong? Where I think they need to be careful is with the non-core stuff. When the music festival/arts festival is on you sometimes cannot get in as the place is packed out for some (ticket only) concert or other.


If you want to talk about a truly awful pub with phenomenally poor food in Sydders then take a wander to The Dulwich Wood House in/on Sydenham Hill. At least the rest of the terrible pubs we have (The Dolphin is our only gastropub) aren't pretending to be something they're not.

woofmarkthedog Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> SalubriousSyddersin Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> * to the tune of "look into my eyes " *

>

>

> " Erm, Waitrosssssse do actually ssssstock Pickled

> Onion

> Monssssster Munch. I know as it'ss ssssomething

> of an

> occasssssssssional guilty pleas-ssssure. They'll

> even deliver

> it via WaitrosssssseDeliver!"

>

>

>

> http://images2.disneysites.com/clipart/images41/Mo

> vies/Robin_Hood/Sir_Hiss/sir-hiss01.gif "I'll pick

> you sssssome up when....

> SSssssss..our Waitrosssssse arrivesssss, if you

> like?

>

> ( now looook into my eyessss..ssss )

>

>

>

> Kinda creepy eh..?

>

>

>

> W**F




A lisp can be a terrible social affliction. You have my sympathies BBW.

Think you're probably about right there Brendan. Though seemingly they've got a new chef so there must be some skill into getting the food out; not that you could tell if you ever had the mis-fortune to eat there.


It used to be a real beauty. Darts in the snug (now a private dining area!!??) etc. I'm all for poncification if the food merits the price tag. And it doesn't even begin to at DWH. A real shame.

Youngs have refurbed most of their pubs in similar fashion over the last few years. I don?t have a problem with new chairs and some paint ect. and their beer is very good but the food is always the same overpriced blandness. A couple of tasteless sausages and some dry mash without enough gravy which you could get in a caf for ?3 but sold in the pub with a gratis 30 minute wait for over a tenner.


Just be grateful you don?t live in SW London where you have to go out of your way to not end up in a Youngs pub.

That's what I mean about it all being relative Keef. I went into the Woodman twice for the roasts and thought my Mother could do better. And she's a terrible cook.


As for the place what do you think will happen to it? I hear it's again reopening? It needs to put a marker in the sand. IF it wants the trade from, say, Halifax Street/Longton Avenue and the similar ones off Kirkdale or Dartmouth Hill then it needs to make it clear that that's their target market and 'gastro up' or whatever the term is. If they want those from *ahem* other streets then pitch if for the Monday night Sky-Sports drinkers who like a good session. It's always fallen between both stools, to me.


Anyway, way off-topic so apologies to the OP.

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Youngs have refurbed most of their pubs in similar

> fashion over the last few years. I don?t have a

> problem with new chairs and some paint ect. and

> their beer is very good but the food is always the

> same overpriced blandness. A couple of tasteless

> sausages and some dry mash without enough gravy

> which you could get in a caf for ?3 but sold in

> the pub with a gratis 30 minute wait for over a

> tenner.

>

> Just be grateful you don?t live in SW London where

> you have to go out of your way to not end up in a

> Youngs pub.



I actually laughed out loud when they brought 5 chips in a ramekin to me for the princely sum of roughly 3 golden nuggets. Daylight effing robbery. The disdain they meted out (or tried to) when I told them I'd not be paying convinced me I was a mug for giving it so many chances these past couple of years!

Don't apologise to The OP, she won't mind.


The last incarnation had a good Polish cook, who IMO did a lovely tasty roast, but couldn't do deserts to save her life.


You may be right, it doesn't know quite what it wants to be. I worry though, that it just wouldn't get enough trade whichever route it chose.


Personally, I quite like somewhere in the middle. I want somewhere I can watch the footy,without feeling like I might get beaten up. But I don't really enjoy the whole gastro thing, I just like a Sunday roast when I can't be bothered cooking,or going to my mum's in Dulwich.

It's just a frigging shop! Who cares. So Sydenham has a Waitrose. Good for them. I'm so pleased. I like Sydenham; I have lots of friends there.


So if SS is right and the only way ED can get a Waitrose is to get a more upwardly mobile demographic (or words to that effect) then I'd prefer not to have one because I don't want a more upwardly mobile demographic. But what bothers me most about this whole thread is that people really seem to be bothered about it. I don't understand. Personally I use Ocado and I'm very happy.


Brendan - if you want to send me your address I'll ship you a Monster Munch care package because I don't like to think of you as being unhappy and going without in Surrey. I wouldn't sleep nights.

You're probably right gigirl. Re-reading my initial post I might have denigrated ED. That wasn't my intention so apologies to anyone who will take offence. I was more hoping to explain that Sydders is not as many would believe. Location, Location, Location had a bit on us a few years back and based solely on the High St these 2 guys ran for the hills [literally as they preferred Upper Norwood with it's 'Westow Triangle']...and I wouldn't blame them. Get off the High St and most are really surprised that it's not Hackney/Tottenham etc - as you might be forgiven for thinking on first inspection!


I've no idea what the % mix is for ED. I was mainly going on the MD of Waitrose's comments. The problem with census info is it's fairly out of date. It's done once a decade and the next one is, well, next year. IF - and looking at the changes in ED this past decade I see no reason to think you wouldn't - there are enough ABC1s then you've got a good chance. There are other demographic indicators that retailers can apply but Govt. figures tend to be their first port of call.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi all, Im a Southwark council leaseholder and live downstairs in a ground floor flat, there is one flat above me, it's a house with individual front doors leading from the street into the shared pathway. My neighbour told me he has had a ring doorbell installed, no discussion as to how I would feel being on camera everytime I go in and out or in my front garden. I was told it's only for deliveries and doesn't record and only activates when pressed, however I don't know this and I feel really uncomfortable everytime I'm out in garden or on doorstep talking to people. Everytime I walk in/out, it lights up and in the eve it has a  infra red  light. Now I've read up that as he said its only for deliveries, he could set it so it only activates when pressed, however it activates with its motion sensor. Had he said to me about getting it installed, I could have had the opportunity to ask about it recording etc but nothing except it's being installed and when I arrived home it was there. I don't like being horrible to people however I feel I have not been considered in his decision and I feel very uncomfortable as, some times I have to stand on doorstep to get signal for my mobile and I really don't like the idea of being watched and listened to. Has anyone got any advice as I'm beginning to get angry as I've asked about it once and was told it only activates when pressed. I believe this is not true. I know southwark council say you need to ask permission to make sure the neighbours are OK with it, I don't really want to go down that road but I don't know how to approach the subject again. They also put a shed approx 3 foot from my back room window, these places are built so my window faces their rear garden and there upstairs window  faces mine. They said it's there temporarily, that was over a year ago and it does affect the light, plus I'm hoping to sell up soon and the view from window is mainly a dark brown shed. When I've mentioned this, I was told they have no where else to put it, whereas originally they said its only temporary, Also the floorboards above are bare and I get woke early morning and at night, the thudding is so bad my light shakes and window rattles, so I mentioned this and asked if they have rugs, I was told when they get the boards re sanded they will get rugs, I should have asked if they could get rugs and just take them up when boards being done, which I would have done had it been me living above someone, their attitude was I can just put up with it until they are ready. so they had the floor boards done, and the workmen was hammering screws, yes screws, in the floorboards, I spoke to workmen to ask how much longer and they said yes, are using screws to make less noise! I could hear the cordless screwdriver, not an issue but for every screw there were at least 8 whacks, the owners had gone out to avoid the noise  so I  spoke to workmen as the noise was unbearable, the sanding, not an issue at all, people need to get things done to their home and I'm fine that on occasions there will be temporary noise. now I have a nice crack on my bedroom ceiling, I mentioned this to owner but no response, he said there were alot of loose floorboards and it will be much better now, not so noisy, as though I don't know the difference between squeaking floor boards and thudding, and nothing was mentioned re the crack or that they now have rugs, which if it were me, I'd be trying to resolve the issue so we can get on with feeling happy in our homes. so I'm feeling it's a total lack of consideration. these places are old and Edwardian and I've lived here over 40 years, had 4 different neighbours and it's only now the noise of thudding is really bad and the people before had floorboards but nothing like this. As you can probably tell I'm really wound up and I don't want to end up exploding at them, I've always got on with neighbours and always said if there's a problem with my dog, pls let me know, always tell me, however I feel it's got to the point where I say something and I'm fobbed off. I know I should tell them but I'm angry, perhaps I should write them a letter. Any suggestions greatly appreciated and thank you for reading my rant. 
    • Sadly, the price we now all pay for becoming a soft apologetic society.
    • Exactly the same thing happened to me a few years back; they were after my Brompton. Luckily there were only 3 of them so I managed to get away and got a woman to call the police, then they backed off, but not after having hit me in the back of the head first. Police said next time just give them what they want, but I sure as hell wasn't just going to hand over my bike to them!
    • In case anyone is renovating or stripping out an old kitchen, I am looking for a base kitchen unit or carcass to house an oven for a temporary set up kitchen.   Also looking for a run of worktop at least 180 cm long if anyone is disposing of something like this, I would be happy to collect.   thanks   Mila
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...