Jump to content

Addictions


ArtVandelay

Recommended Posts

PeckhamRose Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No, you can't assume we're all gonna say shoes.


Damn right! I don't own any. They are impractical, uncomfortable, ridiculous, and vastly over-priced (in my not so humble opinion).:))



*expects a barrage of heels to come flying*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ladymuck, you are right. They are often uncomfortable, frequently rediculous, and always over priced. But there is just no escaping the fact that they are fabulous, sexy, joy inducing, life affirming boxes of pure happiness. If I ever meet Stuart Weitzman I will undoubtedly have one of those screaming teenage beetlemania moments, before falling into a dead faint.


And I make absolutely no apology for that at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



If you mean Seinfeld then yes, but a not especially good one


HOWEVER, the sitcom based around that premise is an all time great


Also worth checking out is a documentary about his attempt at getting back into stand-up after years out of the game (in a parallel story with a fairly obnoxious new guy) , called... Comedian

Link to comment
Share on other sites

legalbeagle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> But there is just no escaping the

> fact that they are fabulous, sexy, joy inducing,

> life affirming boxes of pure happiness.


Sexy? Joy inducing? Life affirming boxes of pure happiness?


LB, as much as I adore you dear friend...I have to say that, on this occasion, you are OFF YOUR BLOOMIN TROLLEY!:))


*falls about laughing*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A good tip for you ladies who, like me, love your shoes. When shopping for shoes I always write my shoe size on a small piece of paper and tuck it into the top of my sock. This saves me having to remove one of my shoes every time I go into a shop.


Don't all thank me for that one at once.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> legalbeagle Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > But there is just no escaping the

> > fact that they are fabulous, sexy, joy

> inducing,

> > life affirming boxes of pure happiness.

>

> Sexy? Joy inducing? Life affirming boxes of pure

> happiness?

>

> LB, as much as I adore you dear friend...I have to

> say that, on this occasion, you are OFF YOUR

> BLOOMIN TROLLEY!:))

>

> *falls about laughing*


Laugh all you like, it's true! And I fear I am not alone. Mr Carnell, Eddie Izzard (*swoon*) and Dame Edna are with me all the way!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I tell you what, I've answered every question you've posed to me on this thread so far, so before you deflect any further, why don't you address the simple questions I've put to you several times first. Here, give them a go: Who has been pressurising the emergency services and how? Do you genuinely believe that people are partially covering their plates and driving through the square due to inadequate signage?  
    • Which original consultation?    Err be careful with the expert opinion and data part.....if you think the cycle lobby and Aldred et al is the sole source of sound opinion on such issues! 😉 And this is where they fell foul of the law and had to re-run the consultation. It actually casts huge doubt on a lot of previous consultations (including the latest DV one) as they do not pass the legal watermark because they do not provide a yes/no response. The council are terrified of a judicial review because, I suspect under legal advice, they know they cheated the system in many previous consultations. Do you remember when the council claimed they had a mandate for the CPZs because of some seriously dodgy research conducted with a large tranche of students in the north of the borough in 2018.....
    • Perhaps the issue is that Southwark don’t listen. They didn’t take account of responses. The proposed CPZs for west Dulwich  stopped when the Council was threatened with a judicial review. Not before. Whatever consultation process was worse than flawed with McAsh arguing that because they were in power, they had a mandate and didn’t need to listen to anyone’s views, rendering any democratic process void. The criteria for LTNs was high population density, high public transport usage and low car ownership so Dulwich Village was a perfect candidate…not. Just a coincidence but I believe some councillors live within the scheme 
    • We’re looking to buy a house in ED (3 Bed, 1,100 sq ft type). Quite a few we’ve found on Landells Road, Pellatt Road and Jennings Road are half houses. Does anyone have a view or any experiences of living/buying a half house?  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...