Jump to content

Lets look at the popes visit as an opportunity to


dulwichmum

Recommended Posts

Anyone who thinks there aren't people putting the boot into Islam in the "liberal" press isn't reading it properly


But if you are wondering why there isn't as much of it as you might like, from a comedy angle


Stewart Lee explaining possible reasons


I feel I can (and will) berate the Catholic church as much as like, because that's what I was brough up in - I know the codes, the vocabulary and the hypocricy intimately.


All that said I wouldn't stop the pope from coming here - let him come and generate debate

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no issue with people's issues about the pope / catholic church. My only issue is with people calling him a Nazi, because he was in the Nazi youth. I'd have liked to have seen them refuse to go along with it at the time.


I know some people did, and I'd love to be able to say I'd have told them to do one, but realistically, when people are being dragged off here there and everywhere, can you blame people for sending their kids along, and keeping quiet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

word keef.

I'm no lover of catholicism or religion in general, but that is just a cheap shot.


There is something slightly worrying about anti-catholicism, which has an atavistcally deep-rooted nature in this country.


The levels of ire it generates seems to be out of all proportion of the levels of bad it manages. I'd put the church today roughly on a par with, say BP and even its nastiness in the past didnt come close to the evils done by secular power, but from what you read from forums, blogs, press and literature (you should see the lunatic fringe hatchet job 'history' book my dad gave me to read, i fear he may have lost it too) you'd think people really were talking about the Nazi party.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What Keef said, and Mockney. I don't know if there's anything to this, but I wonder how much the level of vitriol aimed at the Catholic church has to do with our history as a protestant country: one in the eye to the pope back then, and one in the eye to the pope now.


And Jah, as for your sister, I can see there's a great appeal to Catholicism, to the idea of confession and redemption - doesn't do it for me, but I can see there's potentially a lot of comfort to be found there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have little time for Catholicism and the idea of believing in things generally but it is worth pointing out that there is an increasing body of people within Catholicism who oppose the autocratic, conservative interpretation of the modern church.


Especially bullshit like papal infallibility (an idea cooked up at the first Vatican Council only about 100 years ago for political expediency)


In fact there has for the last half century been a vocal group of Catholics calling for the church to follow the principles from the second Vatican Council which were solidly squashed by the last pope.


While I fully support criticism for the institution and its leaders a lot of this is bordering on intolerance towards a group of the population based on their religion. And that?s a different kettle of fish entirely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What Keef said, and Mockney. I don't know if

> there's anything to this, but I wonder how much

> the level of vitriol aimed at the Catholic church

> has to do with our history as a protestant

> country: one in the eye to the pope back then, and

> one in the eye to the pope now.

>



No - the vitriol here is very much directed at this Pope - not Catholicism per se. Although it has to be said that it is one of the more unpleasant religions when it comes to oppression, moral hypocrisy and all the other reasons why organised religion has no place in a modern society.


People object very strongly to this Pope as he is more reactionary than any in his place for quite some time, when he could actually be doing some good in his position (as bizarre a concept as that might be!)


I (along with many others) also strongly object to paying vast sums of money for his protection while he is here. I thought I was annoyed about cost of the Olympics but in terms of a value:money ratiothis one leaves that particular travesty in the shade!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone worried about anti-Catholocism in this country should rest assured the picture is MUCH better than it was 20-30 years ago. Back then one of the main characters on Corrie being a Catholic was an an entire story-line. These days Catholics are everywhere and no-one bats an eyelid by comparison


I?m sure the anti is well ingrained culturally as well, and that many protestors are just using the occasion as an excuse to vent but I don?t think catholics are cowering in their beds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Ahh!! Poor snail, isn't nature cruel!
    • But you have to assess whether these persistent drivers are creating more safety issues than diverting emergency vehicles on a longer route and clearly they are not. The fact members of the pro-closure lobby have built their argument on this actually shows how desperate, some would say selfish, they are to have the junction closed and just the way they want it. And unfortunately they seem to have the council over a barrel on something as the council weakly concedes to their position without hesitation. Was this not borne from an FOI that said one of the emergency services confirmed that they had not been consulted on the new DV design that Cllr Leeming then said was actually a mistake by the emergency services - and then it's a case of whether you believe Cllr Leeming or not....and his track record is hardly unblemished when it comes to all things LTNs? Exactly! When the "small vocal minority" was given a mouthpiece that proved it was anything other than small then some have repeatedly tried to discredit the mouthpiece.  The far-left has never been very good at accountability and One Dulwich is forcing our local councillors and council to be accountable to constituents and it wouldn't surprise me if the council are behind a lot of the depositioning activities as One Dulwich is stopping them from getting CPZs rolled out and must be seen as a huge thorn in the side of the idealogical plan they have. Southwark Labour has a long track record of trying to stifle constituents with a view that differs from theirs (see Cllr Leo Pollack for one example) or depositioning anyone trying to represent them (see Cllr Williams during the infamous Cllr Rose "mansplaining" episode. But you know, some think it's One Dulwich that are the greatest threat to local democracy and should not be trusted! 😉
    • A song thrush visited my back garden today. I watched as it smashed open a snail by whacking it against the patio.
    • I have no doubt that local people are genuinely involved (and personally can understand their not wanting to publicise their involvement). That said the proliferation of One groups across London and the degree of co-ordination suggests it is more than just a local grassroots group. I’m not really that interested, except that many of their supporters do bang on about transparency and accountability. I would be interested in the substance of their latest missive. Who has been pressurising the emergency services and how? Who genuinely believes that people are partially covering their plates and driving through due to inadequate signage? Sounds a little ridiculous / desperate. It feels like it may be time for them to start coming to terms with the changes tbh.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...