Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Don't be too keen to 'knock' bird poo - it may drop from the heavens, but with it comes wild flower etc. seeds, so it is a positive contribution to our environment, unlike other mammalian contributions (I am not going into flying reptile poo benefits).

Happy Cyclist Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Due to the input from ubcleglen and zebedee tring,

> the list has been amended.

>

> 1-dragon poo

> 2-dog poo

> 3-cat poo

> 4-bird poo

> 5-human poo

> 6-fox poo



This thread is swiftly tuning into poo itself....EDF Poo must be at the top...


I have to agree with Zebedee Tring, who would have though complaining about dogs sh!tting on the street would be so controversial....

I support Woodstock. I love other people's dogs, but I hate and resent having to clear up their dog crap left on the pavement outside the house. Toosmart1973 - put your phone number on this thread so I can call you up to do the crap clearing.
I'm still looking for the "minefields", I walk my dog every day around here and haven't seen much and she can sniff them out for sure. Most people are picking up, obviously there are some that don't. I think this thread will have a good run! ☺

turtle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm still looking for the "minefields", I walk my

> dog every day around here and haven't seen much

> and she can sniff them out for sure. Most people

> are picking up, obviously there are some that

> don't. I think this thread will have a good run!

> ☺


I hope you're not poopooing it

Dog duck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> turtle Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I'm still looking for the "minefields", I walk

> my

> > dog every day around here and haven't seen much

> > and she can sniff them out for sure. Most

> people

> > are picking up, obviously there are some that

> > don't. I think this thread will have a good

> run!

> > ☺

>

> I hope you're not poopooing it



Half and half, I'll let you decide which!

Dog crap on pavements, front gardens or anywhere else is disgusting. Absolutely vial. The OP should not have to clean up the crap from someone else's dog, bucket or water or not. And I am sure people that have not paved over their front garden have not left them, so that it may become a dog toilet. Owners need to clean up after their dogs.

woodstock Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I have no idea. I am doing a public

> service?showing someone clearly committing an

> offence which is punishable with a fine of up to

> ?1,000, and more importantly is deeply

> anti-social. Hopefully if more people posted

> similar pictures then some dog owners might become

> more responsible.

>

> Growlybear Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > On a more serious note, are there not issues

> about

> > publishing photographs of someone on a public

> > forum without their knowledge or consent under

> > circumstances such as this?


Hear hear!


I don't know why people are being so mean (but it isn't surprising because people seem to like insulting others for no real reason). Why anyone who doesn't have a dog should be clearing up dogs mess (which should be cleared up by the dog owner) is bizarre to me; whether it's 7 seconds or not! and it's nasty!


Dog owners should be responsible!!

turtle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't think owners who leave dog mess in the

> street are going to volunteer for this type of

> scheme. Think I'll poo poo that one!


The idea, as it says at the end of the article, is that it eliminates the responsible owners so they can start targeting the irresponsible ones...anyway, why not make it compulsory, now microchipping is compulsory, take a DNA sample at the same time? I know there's a town in Spain which made it compulsory and fined anyone whose dog's mierda was found in the street - virtually 100% eradicated it.

Even the "good" dog owners - the one that scoop the poop - aren't always totally good. Some leave the bags of canine cack on top of the special bins, too lazy to lift the lid. This is exactly what happens on Ryedale, Dunstan's Road end.

No excuse for letting a dog shit on the pavement (or street).

Once you've walked it into your house and up your stairs and tried to clean the stinking mess you may be less inclined to think it's 'no big deal'. That holds only if no-one treads in it.

Zebedee's input (above) is worth looking at too.

This wouldn't qualify as "good" though.


Nigello Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Even the "good" dog owners - the one that scoop

> the poop - aren't always totally good. Some leave

> the bags of canine cack on top of the special

> bins, too lazy to lift the lid. This is exactly

> what happens on Ryedale, Dunstan's Road end.

Mildly interestingly, to me at least, if your CCTV covers people on the street then you could be in breach of the Data Protection Act. Maybe doesn't apply to dogs though.


https://ico.org.uk/for-the-public/cctv


If your camera covers, even partially, any areas beyond the boundaries of your property, such as neighbouring gardens or the street, then it will no longer be exempt from the Data Protection Act (DPA) under the domestic purposes exemption. This does not mean that you are breaching the DPA but it does mean that you might need to take some steps to comply with it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Having  current and relevant experience of both Charter North and Charter East with regards to their conduct towards SEN pupils and their families, I would say that their conduct and behaviour is wholly lacking in understanding as well as making no effort to make reasonable adjustments for the SEN pupil as legally required under Equality Act 2010. Furthermore, I believe that their behaviour is wholly illegal. According to data from Ambitious About Autism, unfortunately that is not uncommon We have separately requested legal advice as to whether or not the specific conduct of the school and certain teachers constitutes a criminal offence under the Children and Young Persons Act 1933 or other legislation. These links have some very good materials to assist parents: https://www.ambitiousaboutautism.org.uk https://www.ambitiousaboutautism.org.uk/understanding-autism/education/exclusions-know-your-rights https://www.ipsea.org.uk https://sossen.org.uk   Also, this link specifically for girls with autism as this tends to be diagnosed at a much later stage than boys and requires different support and reasonable adjustments that the neither of the policies nor behaviours of Charter East or Charter North reflect. https://autisticgirlsnetwork.org   Helen Hayes MP for Dulwich & West Norwood and whose constituency includes Charter North is Chair of the Education Committee at the Houses of Parliament They published this report on the SEND crisis on 18 Sept 2025 https://committees.parliament.uk/work/8684/solving-the-send-crisis/   Ellie Reeves (Rachel Reeves’ sister and formerly Chair of the Labour Party) is the MP for Lewisham West and East Dulwich - the constituency under which Charter East falls I would urge any parents who are concerned about their children, whether SEN or not, who attend Charter North or Charter East to write to your MP canvassing their support and requesting that they write to their respective school on this subject, referencing this report of the Education Committee and the failures of Charter East and Charter North with regards to SEN, their illegal behaviour and soliciting a plan of action from them to immediately stop such behaviour and support SEN pupils with reasonable adjustments as required under the Equality Act 2010. Even if your child is not SEN, the school implementing the correct and legally required procedures materially improves the school environment for all pupils, teachers and non-teaching staff. Often the reasonable adjustments can actually be relatively minor but have a very material benefit. In our experience, there have been one or two teachers who have shown this with very positive results; however, this is the opposite of the institutional approach of both schools which is wholly negative, unsupportive and often illegal. In addition to EHCPs, there is also huge pressure at CAMHS and insufficient resource to support all cases and meet demand.  Even if families and their child are lucky to get access to it, there remains very long wait lists to access treatment.  The same is true in the private sector. A proactive and practical, common sense approach to SEN in this manner by Charter North and Charter East would also help to reduce pressure on CAMHS The latest tragedy last week at Charter North means that this is more pressing than ever.    
    • Thought I'd add a comment as sadly there are now too many primary schools for the number of children in this area... St Anthony's is a wonderful school and my 2 sons were extremely happy throughout the time they were there. They have some open days for reception and  nursery in Nov I believe and welcome children and families of all faiths and backgrounds. It has lovely staff and I cannot recommend it more highly!
    • Anyone has lavender buds they don’t want/that I could harvest/cut and use? Ideally in Peckham/ED goose green area.  Thanks in advance!
    • The tissues would absorb secretions from your nose.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...