Jump to content

Recommended Posts

YES I WOULD AND I HAVE DONE - not in Houston but in New York. There's a restaurant somewhere downtown (Soho I think) that has unisex toilets just like this. You have to remember to turn the light on inside the cubicle though; for some reason nobody can see inside so long as the light is. It was made even more unreal because it was a unisex toilet; very odd to watch passerby whilst having a pee.


On a previous visit to NYC I stayed at the Hudson Hotel (tiny tiny rooms - typical Ian Schrager hotel). Anyway, it was possible to have a shower whilst surveying the Manhattan skyline - that was pretty cool.


Last month I went to Prague for a friend's 40th birthday. I stayed at the Hotel Josef which is a big glass hotel. I stayed in room 801 which has a glass bathroom. It was OK for me because I was on my own - but you really wouldn't want to stay there on a romantic weekend away. Some things are private! Here's a picture

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1428-could-you/#findComment-39470
Share on other sites

No I certainly would not use it, and I would campaign the Dulwich Estates to stand firm against it. It would only encourage perverts and filthy behaviour! OHMYGOD!!!


Why can't they dig out some of those sweet little toilets like the ones (no longer used) on Robson Road (West Norwood) - lots of tiles and below street level.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1428-could-you/#findComment-39868
Share on other sites

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Better than the stinking things in Amsterdam

> that they put there to stop everyone p!ssing

> against the walls.


Which I noticed on Saturday night have now taken up residence in London near Charing X, and around Soho.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1428-could-you/#findComment-40041
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It was my understanding that Jeremy Corbyn was embarrassed by his brother and had distanced himself from his brother's views. I'm sure someone will correct me if I'm wrong. Why on earth should "the overall view of that family inform Jeremy's response to the pandemic"? What exactly are you basing that assumption on?
    • I guess it's best to do what most Brits do these days, keep your head down and say nothing! although that's probably why this country is in the mess it is today!  😞
    • @Dulwichway Absolutely - I'm in no way trying to say that what happened was life-changing. I've encountered way worse situations and think of myself as pretty tough, which is why I took them on and got pelted. I suppose I'm just taken aback because the park always seemed so safe. But the stats I've just posted contradict that.   I suppose the one of the points of this thread is to point out that they weren't just numpty youths - I'd bet money on some of them being involved in more serious criminality. And to tell others to be vigilant. 
    • Still, I guess it could be a lot worse than water being thrown at you by these numpty youths during these warmer times? thankfully it wasn't the more dangerous mugging type youths that crossed your path waving knifes and guns in your face!  just a thought? hopefully these muppets will get sorted by plod soon, but don't hold your breath. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...