Could you?

[Rolo Tomasi]

Personally I'd have to say no. What do you guys think?

[James]

I'm sure there was one of these in London recently - near Tate Modern maybe? And yes, I would use it!

[Jah Lush]

I'm sure there is one of those over here. I certainly remember reading about it somewhere a while back. And, when you've gotta go you've gotta go so of course I'd use it but I guess it would feel a bit weird at the same time.

[Mogs]

Mr. Mogs confirms that there was one in London that was linked to the Tate Britain, in the parade ground of the former Royal Army Medical College Millbank nr. Tate Britain

[ChavWivaLawDegree]

haha, that would be sooo wierd!

[Keef]

I think that would be pretty cool in a very bizare way! Better than the stinking things in Amsterdam that they put there to stop everyone p!ssing against the walls.

[zephyr]

ooooh... what about when it is dark outside. One way glass is great when it is brighter on the outside but when darker on the outside it becomes seethrough. Wonder if the same thing happens with these?

[giggirl]

YES I WOULD AND I HAVE DONE - not in Houston but in New York. There's a restaurant somewhere downtown (Soho I think) that has unisex toilets just like this. You have to remember to turn the light on inside the cubicle though; for some reason nobody can see inside so long as the light is. It was made even more unreal because it was a unisex toilet; very odd to watch passerby whilst having a pee.

On a previous visit to NYC I stayed at the Hudson Hotel (tiny tiny rooms - typical Ian Schrager hotel). Anyway, it was possible to have a shower whilst surveying the Manhattan skyline - that was pretty cool.

Last month I went to Prague for a friend's 40th birthday. I stayed at the Hotel Josef which is a big glass hotel. I stayed in room 801 which has a glass bathroom. It was OK for me because I was on my own - but you really wouldn't want to stay there on a romantic weekend away. Some things are private! Here's a picture

[downsouth]

That bathroom does look good, it just needs black out panes - just in case!

[dulwichmum]

No I certainly would not use it, and I would campaign the Dulwich Estates to stand firm against it. It would only encourage perverts and filthy behaviour! OHMYGOD!!!

Why can't they dig out some of those sweet little toilets like the ones (no longer used) on Robson Road (West Norwood) - lots of tiles and below street level.

[Jah Lush]

Good grief! There was certainly nothing sweet about those scummy old toilets in Robson Road and I'm surprised you remember them Dulwich Mum. But I do agree, let's keep them underground. Out of sight and out of mind eh?

[Brendan]

It is preferable to the open air urinals they have on the side of the road in Shepherds Bush.

Would be cool if they could design an entire building that was transparent from the inside but not from the outside.

[Keef]

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Better than the stinking things in Amsterdam

> that they put there to stop everyone p!ssing

> against the walls.

Which I noticed on Saturday night have now taken up residence in London near Charing X, and around Soho.

[ChavWivaLawDegree]

You lot would have loved the compost toilets I had the pleasure of crapping in this summer!

[Keef]

Sure they can't have been much worse than the ones at Reading. By the third day I was gagging just walking past them!