Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Statistics for you Hugo:


75% of men and 29% of women always have orgasms with their partner (Laumann, Gagnon, Michael, Michaels, 1994).


About 85% of men report that their partner had an orgasm at the most recent sexual event; this compares to the 64% of women who report having had an orgasm at their most recent sexual event. (A difference that is too large to be accounted for by some of the men having had male partners at their most recent event.) (NSSHB, 2010.)


Hugo - is your wife one of the ones who fake it??

Sorry, but earlier you said


The fact that the majority of women have never experienced an orgasm, is reason enough to openly discuss women's sexuality often and publicly, in my opinion.


Icould be missing the point, but I don't see how that is backed up in any way, by the stats you've just posted.

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sorry, but earlier you said

>

> The fact that the majority of women have never

> experienced an orgasm, is reason enough to openly

> discuss women's sexuality often and publicly, in

> my opinion.

>

> Icould be missing the point, but I don't see how

> that is backed up in any way, by the stats you've

> just posted.



Yes, sorry, maybe I should have said a large minority of women have not experienced an orgasm. I think it used to be a majority in the dim and distant past, but seems that things have improved somewhat.


Only 64% of women having orgasms is not good though.

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> I pretty much agree with you GG... BUT,

> this is a slightly different level of discussion

> to a thread on cricket. There are seperate forums

> for this sort of thing you know ;-)



Exactly Keef. Once you get into discussing what content is acceptable for the forum and what isn't then it comes down to censorship. I can't see anybody being in a hurry to grasp that nettle. Frankly, there's nothing on this thread that has disturbed me, whereas some of the content on the various joke threads has left me dumbstruck before now.

binary_star Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Captain Scarlet Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I am not pretending to be coy at all..in fact I

> am

> > a dirty barstard myself I freely admit it

>

> Sorry, I'd assumed you were said builder!

>

> I haven't been offended by anything on this

> thread. I will admit to being a bit shocked

> though. Not at the content, but at the context

> more than anything else.


Sorry, I'd assumed you were said builder!>>Fireman!

No offence taken..

I just hope I have not offended anybody...I was hoping everyone on the forum was open minded?.

Well the only stats I've seen are IV's own. They seem to show her rah rah right on rant was a loadee of oldee bolloxee.


I can't see that helping much when you're down the pub complaining about how hard done by you are, but hell, maybe you're complaining because it's a bonding thing, rather than because its true.

Is he still at it?


I don't recall any conversations with female friends on being hard done by...but yes we could have a very long dicussion of how much women had to do over the last 100 years to get to that place of semi-equality. In fact the only conversations I have with women in the pub are ones that involve us all having a good laugh (because laughter is good for the soul)...something dear H you are obviously desperately in need of....


It seems to me H your issue here is that a group of women are having a conversation about an item that mostly women use. Even worse we are having fun with that conversation as too are the men (apart form you) that have posted. Would you be as indignant if we were discussing the best brand of tampon to use for example....? Probably yes. But it doesn't mean because YOU can not handle it that no-one else should discuss it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I would like to understand this promise by the Greens in greater detail and how it applies locally? Presumably road/pavement upkeep and renewal is as important for cyclists and pedestrians as motorists? I am not aware of plans to build new roads locally but there has been plenty of money spent on converting roads into pedestrian only areas. On the face of it this feels a slightly empty statement, when applied at local level. I'd love to know the Greens stance in hiring out parks for private use (given impact on park environment), I'd also like to understand their stance on fireworks- I will look to see if I can find anything.
    • You are most likely correct in thinking that  Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew it.  But they obviously thought that his skills, abilities and usefulness far outweighed the negatives. Here is a summary of the positives lifted from elsewhere:-   1. Strategic Architect: He was a primary architect of "New Labour," rebranding the party and shifting its core ideology to win the 1997 general election. 2 Master of Communication: Often called the original "spin doctor," he revolutionised how political parties manage the media. He famously created the "grid" system to coordinate government messaging. 3 Networking and Charm: Known as "Silvertongue," he possesses a peerless ability to charm and network with high-level global figures, including business leaders and heads of state. 4. Governance and Trade Expertise: Beyond strategy, he was considered a highly efficient minister, serving as European Commissioner for Trade and Secretary of State across multiple departments, including Business and Northern Ireland.  With his skill and abilities, he delivered results for all his bosses. In the short time in Washington, he found a way to get on the right side of Trump - despite him  being critical of Trump in previous years. That said he is complex personality.  He can be simultaneously brilliant and arrogant, thick-skinned yet sensitive, and selfless for his party while appearing narcissistic in his personal dealings.  My OP asked if he would be accepted over the pond. It turned out he was because he got on famously with trump. He worked out the correct strategy to get on the good side of Trump and secured a better trade deal than the EU and other nations.    
    • Malumbu, do you happen to know what the current figure is for "trips into town made by walking, cycling and public transport"? 
    • Before voting, do you not think it's logical to evaluate each party on its policies and make a tally of the reasons "For" and "Against" voting for each party.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...