Jump to content

Predictions for 2011


Dickensman

Recommended Posts

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DJKillaQueen Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I will be annointed a saint!

>

> You have to be dead to be annointed a Saint. :(



In line with Narnia's prediction it'll probably go like this.....


I'll emerge from the Boho Bar one evening after winning a game of poker and drinking one too many Sambuccas. Climb onto my Harley and start tearing down Lordship Lane, only to see Sue emerging from the East Dulwich Tavern. The throttle will open to full, I'll head straight for her and end up impaled on the optics of the EDT bar to die an almost instant but pleasurable death from alcohol poisoning......


The ghost of Sue will roam ED forever with many sightings and for my sins I shall be made patron saint of Sambucca and a thread discussing what happened, why and who was to blame will run for years with the Boho bar being blamed for everything.


Hmmmmm....so glad that's only a theory lol......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

legalbeagle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Humph.

>

> She gets all the fun.

>

> I have had not one bit of genitalia on my car, of

> any shape or form.


I wouldn't take that personally, LB - my guess is that the willie drawers of ED are a moralistic bunch and as you

drive a 'family' car, they would not wish to cause embarrassment or upset to your little ones. Just wait till you get your mini....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

GCSE results will be worse than the year before for the first time ever


house prices will fall (a positive imo)


unemployment will rise more than expected


but corporate UK (eps) will do better than expected... and bankers will get their bonuses


interest rates will rise


i'll get pregnant

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dickensman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The snotty but 'higher quality' Hill Dweller,

>

> will discover that if you dish it out you have to

> learn to take it,

>

> even from the 'lowest of the lowest classes'.



Just imagine this.

A gutless wolly scuttles like a cockroach away from an ACTUAL 'convo' WITH a fellow poster in to another thread to post ABOUT them.

Are you wearing a hairnet and curlers?

Your mealy-'mouthed' behaviour suggests you should be doing so.


Take it?

What ...... from you?

A stinking cowardly gum slapper?



Oh yes honeybunch :))

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have responded by PM to two.


Another required no reply and yet another was replied to on thread.


Where have I abused people (before they'd abused me)?


What insults? As someone has posted elsewhere, if people wanna give it they need to be able to take it.


Someone doesn't like my opinion of ASSange (so many of them that admire him but behave sooooo very covertly themselves ....LOL) and attacks my input.

Someone else's dirty mind (and possibly their wrong assumption about me and my own body) describes my query to an OP as 'lewd'.


Nope chum, I won't be stowing the 'little hitler' allegations.


Follow your heart < I really mean that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Well worth signing up to become a "supporter" as they send their updates and often shed light on things the council and their supporters would rather didn't get too much attention! https://www.onedulwich.uk/get-involved
    • Spot on...and they rant against "anonymous" groups like One Dulwich and then post missives from "anonymous" lobby groups like Clean Air Dulwich without any sense of hypocrisy or irony...
    • The original council proposals for the area around the Dulwich cross roads were made well before Covid - and were rejected then by locals. The council used the Covid legislation to push through the LTNs when opposition was not allowed. LTNs, as experiments were some good (reduced traffic in areas which did not push traffic elsewhere and which did meet the needs of residents - typically in places very well served by public transport and where the topology (absence e.g. of hills) allowed wide use of cycling and walking - not as it happens a good description of the Dulwich (inc ED, WD and ND) areas.)  Dulwich never met Southwark's own description of ideal LTN areas, but did happen to match Southwark Councillor ambitions dating way back. One Dulwich has been clear, I believe that it is anti this LTN but not, necessarily all LTNs per se. But as it is One Dulwich is has not stated views about LTNs in general. In the main those prepared to make a view known, in Dulwich, have not supported the Council's LTN ambitions locally - whilst some, living in the LTN area, have gained personal benefit. But it would appear not even a majority of those living in the LTN area have supported the LTN. And certainly not those living immediately outside the area where traffic has worsened. As a resident of Underhill, a remaining access route to the South Circular, I can confirm that I am suffering increased traffic and blockages in rush hours whilst living some way away from the LTN. All this - 'I want to name the guilty parties' -' is One Dulwich a secret fascists cabal whose only interest is being anti-Labour?' conspiracy theorising is frankly irrelevant - whoever they are they seem to represent feelings of a majority of actual residents either in the LTNs, or in parts of Dulwich impacted by the LTNs. And I'm beginning to find these 'Answer me this...' tirades frankly irritating.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...