Jump to content

Recommended Posts



Yet more, willfully evasive spin on a subject that you still maintain, via ignorant, deflective supposition, is no longer practiced. And you can't spend your entire life huddled over your keyboard arguing the toss over something you seem to know very little about. Have you thought about getting some fresh air yourself, perhaps?


Although I'd be a fool to not recognize the advantages of knowing how to source food in a post apocalyptic landscape, my hunting of large and small game has no alterior motive, such as preparing myself for what you're suggesting I'm looking forward to, *Bob*. But please, take all the time you need to find, or create, evidence that proves otherwise.



Yes, I understand that animals don't have the luxury of a fallout shelter, and thus wouldn't be around to hunt. But I was just trying to make a point, albeit a laughable one, I admit.


But please, fell free to continue in your reptitive, evasive exercise in distraction.

I think you've got me confused with some vegetarian four pages back.


If you want to jet-off to Bulgaria and creep around in the woods in camouflage paint with a bow and arrow whilst listening to Wagner on your iPod - and come home with a Tupperware container half-full of owl meat and a big smile on your face, you go for it.


I don't object to hunting (aka 'paintballing plus').. never have. Whatever turns you on (and it clearly does).



*Bob*, it seems that we've arrived at some resemblance of civilized discourse, except for a faint wiff of yet more baseless supposition on your behalf that you consistently fail or object to backing-up.


I don't "get off" on hunting in the erotic sense that you've childishly, not to mention evasively (yet again), implied. I won't deny that I enjoy the tracking aspect, but I don't spunk in my underwear once the animal I've shot/skewered draws its last breath. Nor do I hunt to such a dramatic soundtrack as Ride of the Valkyries on full blast on an ipod whilst I "creep around in the woods", I don't own one, and to do so would render the hunt futile, as I'm sure you already know. Or are you so dangerously naive that you didn't?

Quote:

Actually hideously rude is being generous!


Quote:

Would you care to add some evidence that would go towards backing-up that so-far baseless assertion



Immature, Pillock, Stupid oaf,

Imbecile, Dumbass, Childish,

Naive dreadlocked crusty,

Illiterate cretin,

F_cking idiot


All the above words, used by you Scribe, directed towards fellow posters on this one thread.

What exactly is your definition of 'rude'?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Rant ahead: You're not one of them but unfortunately, there's a substrate of posters here that do very little except moan and come up with weird conspiracy theories. They're immediately highly critical of just about any change, and their initial assumption is that everyone else is a total fucking contemptible idiot. For example: don't you think that the people who run the libraries will have considered the impact of timing of reconstruction on library users? (In fact, we know they have - because they've made arrangements at other libraries to attempt to mitigate the disruption). After all, these are the people that spend their whole working week thinking about libraries and dealing with library users (and the kids especially). You don't go into the library game for the chicks and fame - so it's fair to assume that librarians are committed to public service and public access to libraries, including by kids. Likewise the built environment people (engineers, architects, construction managers, project managers, construction contractors, subcontractors or whoever is on this job) are told to minimise disruption on every job they do. The thing that occurs to us as amateurs within 30 seconds of us seeing something is probably not something a full time professional hasn't thought about! Southwark Council, the NHS, TfL, Dulwich Estate, Thames Water, Openreach - they're not SPECTRE factories filled with malevolent chaosmongers trying to persecute anyone. They're mostly filled with people who understand their job and try to do their best with what they've been given - just like all of us. Nobody is perfect or immune from challenge, and that's fair enough, but why not at least start from the assumption that there's a good reason why things have been done the way they have? Any normal person would be pleased that their busy, pretty, lively local library is getting refurbished, and will have more space and facilities for kids and teens, and will be more efficient to run and warmer in winter. But no, EDT_Forumite_752 had kids who did an exam 20 years ago, and this makes them an expert on library refurbishment who can see it's all just stuff and nonsense for the green agenda and why can't it all be put off... 😡😡😡
    • I completely misread the previous post, sorry. For some reason I thought the mini cooper was also a police vehicle, DUH.
    • This has given me ideas for the ginger wine I love, that no one else likes!      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...