Jump to content

Recommended Posts



Yet more, willfully evasive spin on a subject that you still maintain, via ignorant, deflective supposition, is no longer practiced. And you can't spend your entire life huddled over your keyboard arguing the toss over something you seem to know very little about. Have you thought about getting some fresh air yourself, perhaps?


Although I'd be a fool to not recognize the advantages of knowing how to source food in a post apocalyptic landscape, my hunting of large and small game has no alterior motive, such as preparing myself for what you're suggesting I'm looking forward to, *Bob*. But please, take all the time you need to find, or create, evidence that proves otherwise.



Yes, I understand that animals don't have the luxury of a fallout shelter, and thus wouldn't be around to hunt. But I was just trying to make a point, albeit a laughable one, I admit.


But please, fell free to continue in your reptitive, evasive exercise in distraction.

I think you've got me confused with some vegetarian four pages back.


If you want to jet-off to Bulgaria and creep around in the woods in camouflage paint with a bow and arrow whilst listening to Wagner on your iPod - and come home with a Tupperware container half-full of owl meat and a big smile on your face, you go for it.


I don't object to hunting (aka 'paintballing plus').. never have. Whatever turns you on (and it clearly does).



*Bob*, it seems that we've arrived at some resemblance of civilized discourse, except for a faint wiff of yet more baseless supposition on your behalf that you consistently fail or object to backing-up.


I don't "get off" on hunting in the erotic sense that you've childishly, not to mention evasively (yet again), implied. I won't deny that I enjoy the tracking aspect, but I don't spunk in my underwear once the animal I've shot/skewered draws its last breath. Nor do I hunt to such a dramatic soundtrack as Ride of the Valkyries on full blast on an ipod whilst I "creep around in the woods", I don't own one, and to do so would render the hunt futile, as I'm sure you already know. Or are you so dangerously naive that you didn't?

Quote:

Actually hideously rude is being generous!


Quote:

Would you care to add some evidence that would go towards backing-up that so-far baseless assertion



Immature, Pillock, Stupid oaf,

Imbecile, Dumbass, Childish,

Naive dreadlocked crusty,

Illiterate cretin,

F_cking idiot


All the above words, used by you Scribe, directed towards fellow posters on this one thread.

What exactly is your definition of 'rude'?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Unless we don't fly I don't think we can be too critical of the authorities.  
    • In 2016 London City Airport began using concentrated flight paths. When there's a predominantly westerly wind, incoming aircraft approach from East London (north of the River). When there's a predominantly Easterly wind, incoming aircraft approach the airport from the West: circling through Forest Hill, Dulwich, Vauxhall, Tower Hamlets, Docklands. This latter flight path affects many of us in South East London. https://www.london.gov.uk/who-we-are/what-london-assembly-does/questions-mayor/find-an-answer/london-city-airport-concentrated-flight-paths The planes going into City are often below 2,000 ft, so very noisy. Sometimes we have incoming Heathrow at the same time, flying higher. The early flights that I hear e.g. 04:30 are incoming to Heathrow. They are scheduled to land at 05:30 but are 'early'. Apparently the government allows a percentage of flights to arrive early and late (but these are now established as regular occurrences, informally part of the schedule). IMHO Londoners are getting very poor political representation on this issue. Incredible that if you want to complain about aircraft noise, you're supposed to contact the airport concerned! Preposterous and designed solely in favour of aviation expansion.
    • Yet another recommendation for Jafar. Such a nice guy, really reliable and fair. He fixed a problem with our boiler and then incredibly kindly made two more visits to replace a different part at no extra cost. 
    • I didn't have any problems with plane noise until city airport started flying planes to and from about 5-8 minutes apart from 5.30 am or  6 am,  and even with ear plugs and double glazing I am woken at about 6 well before I usually would wake  up. I have lived here since 1986 and it is relatively recently that the planes have been flying far too low over East dulwich. I very much doubt that they are headinbg to Heathrow or from Heathrow. As the crow flies we are much , MUCH closer to City Airport than Heathrow or Gatwick. I even saw one flying so low you could see all the windows, when I was in Peckham Rye Park.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...