Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Almost everyone who moans about it now either:


A: Has never actually been themselves OR


B: Is one of those "you should have been here in 1985" types


It's hard to explain the once in a lifetime experience of standing in a field with 120,000 roaring on Rolf Harris and his wibble board. The usual rules just don't apply to the Glastonbury experience. It's rarely about the headliners although David Bowie's epic set in 2000 still gives me goosebumps.

MrBen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Almost everyone who moans about it now either:

>

> A: Has never actually been themselves OR

>

> B: Is one of those "you should have been here in

> 1985" types


Arf! So true. I fall into the latter category. My one and only experience of Glastonbury in '83 or was it '84? Can't remember and anyway, who cares. I'd been up a few days on the powder before I arrived in the early hours of Saturday morning, took some acid, drank a vat of bloody awful cider, smoked large amounts of marijuana and woke up on Michael Eavis's pool table back at his farmhouse before venturing off to do pretty much more of the same.

As a sidebar, I once made an hilarious remark concerning Beyonce during an information session on benefits.


We were asked if we knew anything about JSA (Job Seeker's Allowance) and for the purposes of comedy I deliberately confused the initials with the name of Beyonce's husband.


At least half the room were falling off their seats in helpless mirth - the others knew nothing of pop music and were perplexed at the response to my remark.


Glastonbury, though, no I won't be going.

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The 'line-up' (by which people usually mean the

> main acts) at Glastonbury has, notoriously, always

> been 'crap'.. but you'd have to be blind deaf and

> dumb to not stumble across at least a couple of

> dozen acts that surprised you. And stumbling

> across things has always been the way to go.. not

> stubbornly traipsing in line with your NME lanyard

> with various bands tediously circled in red pen so

> you can tick bands off like some sort of mundane

> musical treasure hunt.

>

> I preferred the old festival before The Fence went

> up - and probably won't go again - but anyone

> could see (especially in the last couple of years

> prior) that it couldn't continue in the way it was

> - and clearly plenty of people like the way it is

> now.

>

> The best thing about the new security is the

> burgeoning of dozens of smaller festivals -

> including those to cater for the 150,000 people

> who used to arrive without a tent and pay a nice

> man from the north west ?5 for 'special entry'.


Yes, it's not about the headliners. Rarely have all the headliners been quite so crap though.


I prefer the sub-10k festivals. Without lanyards or the rest of it. Roll on Glade (this weekend), the mutant offspring of Glastonbury.

I've just looked at the line up and there are frankly dozens of acts I'd like to see.

Wild horses however couldn't drag me into a field full of a hundred and fifty bloody thousand people. I can barely cope with lordship lane of a Saturday afternoon.


http://www.glastonburyfestivals.co.uk/line-up-poster/ its not just coldplay you know.

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I've just looked at the line up and there are

> frankly dozens of acts I'd like to see.

> Wild horses however couldn't drag me into a field

> full of a hundred and fifty bloody thousand

> people. I can barely cope with lordship lane of a

> Saturday afternoon.

>

> http://www.glastonburyfestivals.co.uk/line-up-post

> er/ its not just coldplay you know.



You're right - and thanks to the link I've found out I'm playing 'WOW' on thursday (got to get a diary secretary)

I like Bob's views


I thought everyone had dropped that stupid pyscophantic shortening of the name to Glaso - what a load of wank (first time I have sworn on this forum).


Anyway, almost off my soapbox. Some of the new acts will be worth watching, it is a shame that the telly only covers the old farts. I rang the BBC to complain when Paul Macca was on. Also how does an audience that was not born when Blondie were in the charts know all the words?


I'm off to Beautiful Days to be a grumpy old man.

It's an entirely different festival now, post 'superfence'.


One element remains - the stage / bands half. But the other half - the apocalyptic, 24-hour Mad Max-esque area centred around the Green Fields, has gone. This was where the party was always at for me and I rarely ventured out of it. It was comparatively dead after the fence.. transformed into a cross between a vegetarian food court and the Lambeth Country Show.


Not that it was all roses near the end.. No Police, with dubious drug dealing by endless streams of dubious shady characters rife to the point of absurdity. I saw people wearing sandwich boards with prices on. Casualties littered the ground by morning, with the paramedic vehicles constantly sweeping through. Tents pillaged nightly. Some genuinely scary people and an occasional air (or worse) of intimidation and violence.


But it was a genuine experience. A totally unpredictable, random experience. Tens of thousands of people (many, completely unhinged) on an unfettered four day path to total excess.


It used to feel like a giant party - with some festival/bands thing on the other side providing an atmospheric backdrop. Now I think it just feels like 'a pop festival'.

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Now I think it just feels like 'a pop festival'.


Ah, but they have the leftfield tent, hosting "debates" earlier in the day ("POWER IN A UNION", "ANOTHER WORLD IS POSSIBLE", etc)... and then Billy Bragg sings some songs. You can't go wrong with that, can you?

You're right.. 'just a pop festival' is unduly harsh.

It's still a great festival and I'll still wish I was there when it starts.


But it's definitely less of a party. A lot of party people who used to make it really swing (daddio) have decamped to other smaller festivals - ones that cater more specifically for them, only with less associated hassle and more chance of it not pissing down!

My first year was 84, only about 30,000, sunny, sit on the grass and the hippies came round selling 'red leb' 'acid' 'speed'. Four years later it was organised drug dealers and much more threatening, and the new age traveleers were getting more unfriendly. Which is why the police were called in. But their gig was pretty bad, probably owing to the spat between sting and the others.


Also saw half man half biscuit on the second stage.


Please change the name of this thread to Glasonbury.

People not at Glastonbury begin enjoying plight of those who are


Meanwhile, meteorologist, Jane Thompson, explained: "Scientifically speaking, if you insist on booking Bono and putting him on a pedestal to be worshipped, God will try to drown everyone within a five mile radius."

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • That’s around £60 per cat. It costs much more privately and is entirely reasonable. Since you’re keen on numbers perhaps think about one cat having three litters of five kittens every year, and those 15 kittens each having three litters of five every year from the first year.  It’s exponential and absolutely an emergency. You can pick your own charity to support, I’m not diminishing other appeals or causes. I imagine the need is related to people having less money and not being able to afford the fees privately. Perhaps in more prosperous times, more people could afford to neuter their cats. Let’s not wait for the good times to roll back round, let’s do it now, before it becomes an absolute crisis, and help as much as we are able to.  
    • Sorry have I read this correctly?  Almost£250,000 to neuter3,500 moggies?  Granted, when neutered a lot less off spring… That sort of money could help elderly, schools - both for books and food for deprived children, carers, a coach for community use…. I am an animal lover but just seems excessive to me when we read in the press how hard some families are coping. Is there not a pill that could be given which would have the same result and be cheaper? What do our European neighbours do? This has been going on for years - why not have launched an appeal when people were more  prosperous?  
    • https://www.justgiving.com/campaign/celia-hammond-animal-trust-cat-crisis?utm_medium=CA&utm_source=CL the charity are raising money to enable them to neuter cats. There are so many cats already needing homes and they are at breaking point and in crisis.   “We have launched this emergency appeal to raise £230,000 to enable us to neuter, microchip and provide necessary supportive treatment to approximately 3,600 female cats during October, November, and December 2025. The aim is to tackle the cat overpopulation crisis by preventing the unnecessary birth of potentially tens of thousands of kittens in 2026. Cats are seasonal breeders who give birth to their kittens in Spring and Summer, so it is vitally important that this Autumn and Winter we neuter as many cats as possible before the next breeding season begins in early 2026.  How you can help  It costs us £45 to neuter a female cat using our own employed vets working at our London clinics (compared to local private vets which charge £150 - £250), and we are relying on animal lovers everywhere to support our emergency appeal to help tackle the cat overpopulation crisis.  Whether it is £10, £20, £30 or more, please donate whatever you can afford as we really need your help now, more than ever before. And if you live within a 30-mile radius of our Canning Town, Lewisham, or Brede centre and can provide a forever home for one or more of the cats and kittens in our care, please visit www.celiahammond.org/adopt-a-cat for details of the animals currently seeking homes”. Please support them with anything you can. 
    • I grew up in SW London and London by and large has been somewhere as many say that you just need to keep your wits about you.  I've lived in various areas of SE London and moved to Dulwich quite recently. I do think post pandemic in particular though as though it's a bit edgier, I'm slightly more guarded than I was growing up in the 90s and 00s. I feel recently I'm much more likely to see unprovoked aggression and people to keep a distance from than I was before including in Dulwich around the area I live. I think austerity and cost of living changes have hit people quite hard.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...