Jump to content

Recommended Posts

"It's simplistic to think in terms of location in the current market, which is fractured along price boundaries more than geographical ones."


It's also simplistic to ignore location, because there is still such a strong link between location and price. The price differential between ED and Nunhead for comparable houses/flats of whatever size and condition demonstrates that, but at the same time it is clear that ED is not like St John's Wood or South Ken where the premium for a desirable location is nailed on.


Price across the market as a whole (as opposed to differentials) is ultimately determined by both incomes and the cost of credit. For the former, London will continue to have a concentration of comparatively high-earners for the foreseeable future. For the latter, lenders (with the assistance of government) are already openly exploring ways to get first-time buyers back into the market, and those lenders are going to regard London property generally as a better risk than most other parts of the UK. The higher up the chain you go, the more equity there is and the more secure it is.


Conclusion - 4 double bed family homes, with gardens, near stations, in reasonable neighbourhoods with nice shops and decent primary schools are going to be in high demand anywhere, and there genuinely aren't many places in London Zones 2-3 that tick all those boxes and are cheaper than ED. Try Streatham.

DaveR Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's also simplistic to ignore location, because

> there is still such a strong link between location

> and price.


I think we agree. The correlation between location and price causes a lot of confusion about the market. London as a whole appears to have escaped the worst of the crash, but that's only because expensive houses have held up. The bottom of the market continues to fall, even in desirable locations within London. There's no such thing as a crash-proof location.


> Conclusion - 4 double bed family homes, with

> gardens, near stations, in reasonable

> neighbourhoods with nice shops and decent primary

> schools are going to be in high demand anywhere,

> and there genuinely aren't many places in London

> Zones 2-3 that tick all those boxes and are

> cheaper than ED. Try Streatham.


This wasn't the case in 2008, when prices fell across the board. The high demand for big family homes in good locations is supported by the low bank rate. Put up the rate and demand will fall off, though perhaps not as much as at the bottom of the market where buyers have less equity.


> Try Streatham.


No need, I have a house in ED.

Not all true, I am a (ahem, front-office banker) and proud owner of a 4 bed house near station bought in last 16 months for c.600k. If you search hard enough, the properties are there. If you bargain even harder, they are there for the right price.


benmorg Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> chantelle Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > also plenty of bankers and other City types in

> ED

> > and environs ... shhhh.

>

> Sure, but they're invariably back-office staff.

Maccers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Not all true, I am a (ahem, front-office banker)

> and proud owner of a 4 bed house near station

> bought in last 16 months for c.600k. If you

> search hard enough, the properties are there. If

> you bargain even harder, they are there for the

> right price.



edit: oops, wrong thread.


Which bank? Can I have a job there?

As I was saying, not all bankers (even traders and other front-office) are rich, and even those that are might not want to put all their money into property. If you want a sub-million pound house with 4/5 bedrooms, within an easy commute to the City and Canary Wharf, East Dulwich would seem like a reasonable bet.

Couldn't agree more Jeremy. ED is a great place to live, I've been here since 2002. As others have already said, relative to some other areas of south London within the circular is still good value.


Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> As I was saying, not all bankers (even traders and

> other front-office) are rich, and even those that

> are might not want to put all their money into

> property. If you want a sub-million pound house

> with 4/5 bedrooms, within an easy commute to the

> City and Canary Wharf, East Dulwich would seem

> like a reasonable bet.

I personally believe East Dulwich has hit it's ceiling, and would have done so regardless of the credit crunch. The only reason prices are remaining stable is because of demand/supply, just basic economics really. The lack of tube, poor transport links relative to other inner London areas and a high street still lacking many major retailers (primarily down to lack of space) will mean that this area will now remain stable for the foreseeable future.


Louisa.

chantelle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> transport depends where you are.


When Deptford got DLR, it didn't help boost house prices and didn't improve the area. I'm not sure the Overground will make much difference, though it might lift prices slightly before people realise how little difference it makes to transport links.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The only reason prices are remaining stable is because

> of demand/supply, just basic economics really.


Supply of housing is fixed. It's demand that can change overnight if mortgages suddenly get cheaper (unlikely) or more expensive (inevitable).

We can all try and speculate but its really not that straight forward, demand is linked to currency markets, education, transportation, availability of equity & debt, area appeal etc. Any one of these changing is strong enough to influence a market.


Supply is also influenced by the above trends.


Ultimately unless your investor, if you can afford it and love it then buy it and enjoy it

At the end of the day prices are what they are, you accept them or you look somewhere else ( except Lewisham as that is worse than Glasgow).


I would love to live in Eaton Square but sadly, short of squatting, it isn't going to happen. Am I chucking my toys out the pram about it? Not yet....

chantelle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> benmorg - you've got to be kidding. Deptford may

> not be some top destination but it has definitely

> had massive development and new build flats are

> going at similar prices to nicer areas.


But not the kind of development that improves an area - take a stroll down Deptford High Street.


New-build flats fall furthest and fastest when the market tanks. They aren't a good investment. Good value at auction when they get repossessed though.

Deptford didn't take off because it never had the right kind of housing stock in the first place. Having good transport links will never change that. Just take a walk around Bermondsey or Elephant.


Improving transport links in an area with a load of family sized Victorian houses is a totally different matter though.

Just take a walk around Bermondsey


Bermondsey hasn't been improved? compared to when? I would argue strongly that Bermondsey now compared to 20 years ago is a massive improvement. And not just Bermondsey St


And Elephant is changing too

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Just take a walk around Bermondsey

>

> Bermondsey hasn't been improved? compared to when?

> I would argue strongly that Bermondsey now

> compared to 20 years ago is a massive improvement.

> And not just Bermondsey St

>

> And Elephant is changing too


At elephant the high-rise blocks of flats are being knocked down and replaced with.. high-rise blocks of flats. I'm not sure this will transform the area. Maybe proximity to central London will eventually do the trick. They need to raze that depressing shopping centre though.

I moved to bermondsey in 2003 (just off tower bridge road- so near elephant) and left to move to ED in October last year.


The area certainly changed whilst I was there. The western end is faring better in terms of gentrification - spill over from bermondsey st area. Bermondsey tube area is surrounded by council estates and has not changed that much, although there are new developments cropping up.


Elephant in a funny place. Financial crisis massively delayed development and it seems that the awful shopping centre will never be knocked down. Many people got caught badly short buying in the new blocks that were completed in 09/10 and were in negative equity. That said, heygate has been demolished, which is (some would say) a step forward. Other big issue they have there is that the tube is not up to handling increased numbers (no escalators) which is proving to be problematic from a development perspective.

  • 2 weeks later...

new mother Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Where are you, pls? Super speedy sounds good (and

> rare)



My lips are sydenham sealed.


From my house to work ( Hoxton ) 30 mins.


Canada Water 20+ minutes.



(tu)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • You could attend the next edf drinks    https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/360548-ed-forum-drinks/page/3/#comments
    • Hi Sue, they were not local solicitors. Andrea’s was based in Wales and the other firms involved were large nationwide conveyancing companies (rather than conventional high street solicitors). I’m happy to advise clients and buyers privately on what I believe to be their shortcomings but I don’t think doing so in public on the forum would be appropriate, particularly as they are not locally based. My general advice would always be to steer clear of the big conveyancing companies as they are, in my experience, notoriously difficult to contact when the need arises and the case handler is often not a fully qualified solicitor and so issues have to be referred upwards to “technical teams” internally, which was part of the problem in Andrea’s chain. Tony
    • A slightly vulnerable but hopeful post… Hi everyone, I’m a guy in my mid-thirties who’s recently moved back to London and East Dulwich (I previously lived here for many years before, so I know the area well). But if I’m honest, I’ve found the return a little tough. Most of my close friends have moved out of London to start families — totally understandable — but it’s left me feeling a bit adrift and not quite sure how to make new connections again. Work has taken up a huge chunk of my life in recent years, and I’ve definitely let hobbies, interests and a proper social life fall by the wayside. I feel like I went from a fun social life in my 20’s to suddenly blinking and realising things had gone a bit er…quiet. So, I’m trying to redress the balance a bit — mainly so myself and my partner don’t murder each other 😂, and just to meet some new local faces. I was wondering: is anyone else in a similar boat? And would there be any interest in starting a relaxed, low-key local social group? Could be a casual pub meet, sports, park hangouts, live comedy nights — open to ideas!  I’m happy to do the organising/admin side of things — just wanted to put it out there and see if there’s any appetite. I’ll gauge interest and take it from there.  If you’d prefer not to reply publicly, feel free to drop me a DM.  Cheers all! 👋
    • It's Inner London. You could move somewhere else?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...