Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have just watched this incredibly powerful, well-reasoned and smart film made by someone I regard as the lone voice of dissent in America. What is wrong with that country? Are the people so lacking in sense and reason that they do not criticise or question their leaders? Is there nobody in the American media willing to provide a debate about the state of the nation and the plight of the poor?


I am very distressed by America and this film has really hammered home that feeling. Don't be poor and ill in the USA.


Great film. And it actually restored some pro-British sentiment in me as well.



Charlie

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1799-michael-moores-sicko/
Share on other sites

I really dislike the guy and abhorred columbine and 9/11. Selective, manipulative and downright disingenuous.

My attitude is I'm glad there's someone saying these things, I just wish it wasn't him.

However I've heard a lot of good things about Sicko and will give him the benefit of the doubt and watch it. Perhaps he's decided to be a serious documentary maker in order to give his enemies less ammunition.

I'm ambivalent. He is at least challenging the received wisdom and mores of this current time Especially in the wake of 9/11. With the notable exception of Noam Chomsky, most media bods were singing from the same hymn sheet. Yes he is a bit of a fantasist/self-publicist but so long as it makes people think that imho is a good thing.
he certainly is a very unlikable and manipulative character, pretty much like the bloke that did the film on mcdonalds,super size me, theres guys making a lot of money out of what joe public knows already, that the american healthcare system is unfair,that bush is a mong and that mcdonalds is bad for you but apart from mcds introducing salad and fruit to the menu is what they say going to change anything except the size of their bank balance i think not.

I think you have to focus on the stength of the story telling, the smart research, great examples and a simple argument told convincingly and in a straightforward way. He's a bit of a knob but his work is great.


I always loved his first film where he tried to track down the head of GM that closed the plants in Flint Michigan to ask him about the consequences of his actions.



Charlie

You should read the bit in Robert Fisk's book [Great War for Civilisation] where he smuggles a chunk of shrapnel from a Hellfire that blew up an ambulance leaving a lebanese village killing three kids and a woman.

He takes it, along with a photograph of the dead, to a meeting with some high ups at lockheed martin who thought he wanted to write a piece about how wonderful their missile.

Worth a (often harrowing) read.

Roger and Me was the film in which he tried to track down the CEO of GM. It was his first documentary, and he remortgaged his house to make it. However, even some of that has been called into question now ? apparently he was granted an interview but didn't use it in the film. I guess we'll never actually know the truth; but either way, it doesn't change the message ? it's still a great documentary.


Latterly though I think he's lost it; it all seems to be about him now. The bit towards the end in Columbine where he was comforting that schoolteacher was just vomit inducing. What's changed between his first film and now is that he gets in the way of the message. And because of imitation, his methods seem a bit old hat.

Re Bowling for Columbine: towards the end Moore interviews Charlton Heston. Heston comes off as a rather dignified chap who actually invites Moore into his home, whereas Moore comes off as arrogant and manipulative. I'm sure this isn't what Moore had in mind - looks like he let his ego get the better of him.

I went to see SICKO last week. I thought the film was very thought provoking about how a privatised health system works in practice. However the film did not look at any of the 'modernisation'(i.e. privatisation) of our NHS, including the PFI, cuts in services, contracting out and the rest. Although this is a flaw, the film is entertaining and is well worth seeing.


Michael's statement at the BFI film premi?re I went to, acknowledged we need to protect our NHS and that US experience is a warning of how things could turn out for us. This Sat(3rd November) there is a demonstration in support of the NHS in central London (setting off at Temple Place, Victoria embankment (opp South bank) at 11am. I hope people can attend as I think Brown et al thinks that privatization is a vote winner and we are not able to understand the consequences of what they are doing.


If anyone needs more info please pm me.

With regards Moore, I basically agree with Piers' first post. If may be doing a good thing trying to uncover some of the shit that goes on, but he just comes across as a fat nerdy conspiracy theorist much like the guy who owns the comic shop in the Simpsons. If tries too hard to sensationalize (sp?).
You should see it MP. It is quite possibly Film?s greatest moment. Forget the girl in the red dress in Schindler?s Lists, Lawrence of Arabia stumbling out of the desert or the battle of Helm?s Deep. Watching something that countless young boys have done with a GI Joe and a stolen Barbie doll played out on celluloid is an experience you will never forget.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The decision to leave the EU was a poor one, but I'd avoid the term stupid when applied to the masses (the decision was of course stupid) and blame those who willingly misled.  A certain N Farage (pronounced with a hard G rather than the soft G he affected, rather continental eh?) being one of the main culprits. He blames the Tories for not delivering Brexit, and not really clear how Labour are playing this.  But ultimately what sort of Brexit were people voting for?  And ditto what future were people voting for last Thursday?
    • "That’s very insulting! You are basically calling 17 million people that voted to leave the EU ‘thick’. " I'm certainly calling them wrong. And many of those 17 million agree with me now and have expressed regret. Many others were indeed thick, and remain so. You can see them being interviewed all the time. As for insulting, the losing side in that referendum have being called every name under the sun "enemies of the people" etc etc - so spare me the tears about being insulted But for clarity. there is a certain type of individual who even now thinks Brexit was a good idea, tends to side with Trump and holds views about immigrants - and yes I am happy to calll those people thick. - and even worse Jazzer posts a long and sometimes correct post about the failings of modern parties. I myself think labour are woefully underperforming. But equally it has been less than a year after 14 years of mismanagement and despite some significant errors have largely steadied the ship. You only have to speak to other  countries to recognise the improvement there. They have cut NHS waiting times, and the upside of things like NI increases is higher minimum wage - something hard-bitten voters should appreciate. They were accused of being too gloomy when they came in and yet simultaneously people are accusing them of promising the earth and failing to deliver - both of those can't be true at the same time Fact is, this country repeatedly, over 15 years, voted for austerity and self-damaging policies like Brexit despite all warnings - this newish govt now have to pick up the pieces and there are no easy solutions. Voters say "we just want honest politicians" - ok, we have some bad news about the economy and the next few years  - "no no not that kind of honesty!!! - magic some solutions up now!" Anyone who considers voting for Reform because they don't represent existing parties and want "change" is being criminally negligent in ignoring their dog-whistles, their lack of diligence in vetting, their lack of attendance (in Westminster now and in eu parties is guises past) and basically making all of the same mistakes when they pushed for Brexit - basically, not serious people   "cost of things in the shops and utility bills keep on rising, the direct opposite of what they promised." - can we see that promise? I don't recall it? Because whatever voters or govts want, the cost of things is not exactly entirely in their gift. People were warned prices would rise with Brexit and e were told "we don't care - it's a price worth paying!". Turns out that isn' really true now is it - people DO care about the cost of things (and of course there are other factors - covid, trump, tariffs, wars etc.    What the country needs is a serious, mature electorate who take a high level view of priorities and get behind the hard work needed to achieve that. There is zero chance of that happening so we are doomed to repeat failures for years to come, complaining about everything and voting for policies which will make things worse here we have labour 2024 energy manifesto commitments - all of it necessary long term investment - calling for immediate price cuts with no money in the kitty seems unrealistic given all of the economic headwinds   https://www.energy-uk.org.uk/general-election-2024-all-manifesto-energy-pledges/#Labour_Party
    • Regardless of “Blighty” it’s the combination of “we” “R” and “Blighty” we means there is a them  cancerian may or may not recognise a dog whistle.  If he doesn’t, we are trying to point one out.  If he does then they are trying to gaslight us into pretending they are just a lovely fundraising group with no agenda 
    • I’m on Darrell Road and have noticed this recently - your daughters are not alone! It seems to only be at night. Would you agree? High pitched and consistent. I’ve been wondering if it’s a street lamp, or a fox deterrent system.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...