Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Want to recommend Emmanuel Marshall children's shoes in the ED warehouse. Professional fitting service, good range of school shoes (just bought ours) loads of summer shoes hugely reduced including birkenstocks. Getting wellies in soon. And the kids got a bag of jelly beans. Everyone happy.

She also has a loyalty scheme - buy 5 pairs of shoes and get 20% off 6th pair. She has baseball boots for ?6 and cute flip flops for ?1!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/18817-childrens-shoe-shop/
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
I'd also like to recommend Emmanuel Marshall at ED warehouse. Went there on a saturday with my daughter and got excellent service - she took a lot of care and time fitting and paid attention to the shape of my daughter's feet and toes (high instep, long toes), which John Barnetts never bothered to do. Incidentally, she said that she takes old childrens shoes and passes them on to Variety club charity for reconditioning and sending off to children in Africa.
Dorothy at Emmanuelle Marshall is brilliant. When she fitted my kids recently she paid so much attention to detail like long toes and high instep not just the reading on the gauge. She used to manage a Clarks shop apparently. We will be buying all our shoes from her in future.
  • 3 weeks later...
Yep, we went to Emmanuelle Marshall today - so impressed with the service and the prices, am going back next week when she gets her new boot stock in! Generally a lovely experience shopping in the ED Warehouse - we ordered a coffee (which was brought to us whilst we were doing the shoe thing)and could pay for everything on a card when we were finished. Vowed to myself to make a concerted effort to support these places - people going out of their way to provide great service, you don't realise how much of a difference it makes until you experience it.

I want to add to the list of recommendations for Dorothy at Emmanuel Marshall - I took my daughter there yesterday as she had her heart set on "boots with zips" (got to love 3.5 year old girls and their attention to detail!). It was a lovely relaxed setting, Dorothy was really good with her, and most importantly we came away with a great pair of boots that my daughter is very pleased with.


There was a lovely range of shoes there, nice to have something different to the standard Clarks offerings.


Definitely worth a visit if you haven't already been.

I also would like to add a recommendation for Dorothy at Emmanuel Marshall. She spent a very long time fitting shoes for my girls, and a lovely choice of styles. Prices are similar to clarks/startrite - and we even got a 10% discount for being twins, even though I only bought one pair of shoes. She was also very happy to fit and comment on a pair of shoes I had bought from another shop. Will definitely be back for another visit

Another happy punter! Took my son and Dorothy was so lovely! Got a stylish and a bit different pair of shoes. He loves them so much he said he'd wear them to bed if he could! Also going to post on the thread that mentions Dorothy's shop's name to give it a better 'heads up'.


Hope Dorothy's here to stay!


Helen

Stardust, I eonder if they officially do a twins discount? I usually tSke mine to clarks to get the 10% tamba discount ,.. Which applies to all 3 (soon to be 4 needing shoes ... Aargh!)


Also, are they good for wide fittings? Child no 1 is h fitting which usually involves ordering shoes in especially

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, AFAICS, the "civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300" were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...